In:Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 297–313
Chapter 12Exploring evidential uses of the passive of reporting verbs through corpus analysis
Published online: 21 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.13bre
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.13bre
Abstract
One feature which has interesting evidential implications in English is the passive form of verbs of saying or thinking. Corpus evidence is used to trace the evolution of the most frequent passive structures of this kind over the last two hundred years, and to explore changes in their use. Diachronic developments in frequency, and evidence for semantic and syntactic narrowing of the passive forms of “say”, “expect” and “suppose”, are analysed in the light of claims that these forms are becoming grammaticalised. Trends concerning the deontic and evidential uses of “expect” and “suppose” are discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Corpus and method
- 3.Patterns of frequency today
-
4.Diachronic developments
- 4.1Patterns of frequency over time
- 4.2Changing trends in use
- 4.2.1“BE said to”
- 4.2.2“BE expected to”
- 4.2.3“BE supposed to”
- 5.Conclusions
Acknowledgements References
References (21)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. “Evidentiality in Typological Perspective.” In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, and Robert M. W. Dixon, 1–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006a. “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text-driven Approach.” Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar, Tense, Aspect and Modality in Languages of the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Davies, Mark. 2007. TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s. <[URL]>
. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. <[URL]>
. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009. <[URL]>
. 2011. Google Books Corpus. <[URL]>
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunston, Susan, and Gill Francis. 1998. “Verbs Observed: A Corpus Driven Pedagogic Grammar.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 45–72.
Noël, Dirk. 2001. “The Passive Matrices of English Infinitival Complement Clauses. Evidentials on the Road to Auxiliarihood?” Studies in Language 25 (2): 255–296.
Noël, Dirk, and Johan van der Auwera. 2009. “Revisiting Be Supposed To from a Diachronic Constructionalist Perspective.” English Studies 90: 599–623.
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1995. “Subjectification in Grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Bernd Heine. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.
Yang, Linxiu. 2013. “Evaluative Functions of Reporting Evidentials in English Research Articles of Applied Linguistics.” Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3 (2): 119–126.
Ziegeler, Debra. 2008. “Propositional Aspect and the Development of Modal Inferences in English.” In Modality-Aspect Interfaces: Implications and Typological Solutions, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 43–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
