Cover not available

In:Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 195–223

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 8
Multifunctionality of evidential expressions in discourse domains and genres

Evidence from cross-linguistic case studies

 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Published online: 21 March 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.09mar
Abstract
This paper examines the phenomenon of multifunctionality of evidential expressions in unscripted oral discourse and in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish. The paper examines the distribution of evidential expressions in relation to discourse-domain, genre-related or language-related distinctions, as well as the similarities or differences in multifunctionality of evidential expressions in the two languages, and the degree to which certain evidential values are associated with particular constructions. Results point to significant similarities across languages in both genre-related preferred types of evidential expressions, and to certain cross-linguistic differences in the degree to which there are correlations between evidential values and evidential constructions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Evidentiality in discourse
    • 2.1Epistemicity and evidentiality
    • 2.2Functions of evidentiality
    • 2.3Semantic extensions in TAM systems
    • 2.4Multifunctionality of evidential expressions
    • 2.5Evidential functional values and constructions with ‘seem/appear’ and ‘parecer’
  • 3.The case studies
    • 3.1The texts
    • 3.2Case studies: Research questions and hypothesis
    • 3.3Research objectives and procedure
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Case Study 1: Results in genres of Journalistic Discourse
    • 4.2Multifunctionality and constructions with ‘seem’ and ‘parecer’
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (49)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Information Source and Evidentiality: What Can we Conclude?” Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 209–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besnard, Anne-Laure. (this volume). “ BE likely to and BE expected to, Epistemic modality or Evidentiality? Markers of (non)commitment in newspaper discourse”.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. New York: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Johanna Nichols (eds.) 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2014a. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Frames of Reference and the Linguistic Conceptualization of Time: Present and Future.” In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, ed. by Kasia M. Jaszczolt, and Louis de Saussure, 236–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, and Björn Wiemer. 2015. “Evidentiality and the Semantics–pragmatics Interface. An Introduction.” Belgium Journal of Linguistics 29: 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio, and Eva-Maria Remberger. 2008. “Hearsay and Reported Speech: Evidentiality in Romance.” Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 95–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2007. “Raising as Grammaticalization: The Case of Germanic SEEM-verbs.” Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 129–150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick, and Liliane Tasmowski. 2001. “Introduction: Evidentiality and Related Notions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 339–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova. 2010. Evidentiality in German. Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas, and Jasper Holmes. 2007. “A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance.” English Language & Linguistics 11 (1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givon, Thomas. 1989. Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, Laura. (this volume) “Evidential and Epistemic Stance Strategies in Scientific Communication: A Corpus Study of Semi-formal and Expert Publications”.
Johnstone, Barbara. 2007. “Linking Identity and Dialect through Stancetaking.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 49–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, Günther. 2011. “ Seem: Evidential, Epistemic, or What Else? A Study in Cognitive Semantics.” International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 2 (1): 1–24Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, Günther, and Martina Lampert. 2010. “Where Does Evidentiality Reside? Notes on (Alleged) Limiting Cases: Seem and Be like .” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63 (4): 308–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this volume). “Evidentiality in Cognitive Grammar.”
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2011. “Effective vs. Epistemic Stance and Subjectivity in Political Discourse: Legitimising Strategies and Mystification of Responsibility.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Chris Hart, 193–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Stancetaking and Inter/Subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry: Blair vs. Brown.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús and Johan van der Auwera, 411–445. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015a. “Epistemic Legitimisation and Inter/subjectivity in the Discourse of Parliamentary and Public Enquiries.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 261–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015b. “Epistemicity and Stance: A Cross-linguistic Study of Epistemic Stance Strategies in Journalistic Discourse in English and Spanish. A Cross-linguistic Perspective.” Discourse Studies 17 (2): 210–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. “Stancetaking and Inter/Subjectivity in Journalistic Discourse: The Engagement system revisited.”In Evaluation in Media Discourse: European perspectives, ed. by Ruth Breeze, and Inés Olza, 21–48. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana and Marta Carretero. 2014. “The Expression of Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in English and other European Languages: A Cross-linguistic Study of must and deber(de) .” In Linguistic Insights: Studies on Languages, ed. by Isabel de la Cruz Cabanillas, and Cristina Tejedor Martínez, 336–346. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis, and Lev Michael. (eds.). 2014. Evidentiality in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2005. “The Modal Confusion: On Terminology and the Concepts behind it.” In Modality: Studies in form and function, ed. by Alex Klinge, and Henrik H. Müller, 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. “The Place of Evidentiality within the Universal Grammatical Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, José and Wilbert Spooren. 1996. “Subjectivity and Certainty in Epistemic Modality: A Study of Dutch Epistemic Modifiers”. Cognitive Linguistics 7 (3): 241–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, Louis de. 2014. “Perspectival Interpretations of Tenses.” In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, ed. by Kasia M. Jaszczolt and Louis de Saussure, 46–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, Louis de, and Patrick Morency. 2012. “A Cognitive-pragmatic View of the French Epistemic Future”. French Language Studies 22: 207–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2004. “Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance.” Lingua 114: 873–895. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Lexical vs. Grammatical Evidentiality in French and Italian.” Linguistics 46 (5): 917–947. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1982. “Root and Epistemic Modals: Causality in Two Worlds.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 484–507.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Len. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12: 40–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s Semantic Map”. Linguistic Typology 2 (1): 79–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vestergaard, Torben. 2000. “From Genre to Sentence: The Leading Article and its Linguistic Realization.” In English Media Texts Past and Present, ed. by Friedrich Ungerer, 151–173. Amstersdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Ake. 1983. “The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study”. Linguistics 21 (1): 123–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Peter R.R. 2012. “Exploring the Axiological Workings of ‘Reporter Voice’ News Stories – Attribution and Attitudinal Positioning”. Discourse, Context & Media 1: 57–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2010. “Hearsay in European Languages: Toward an Integrative Account of Grammatical and Lexical Marking”. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald, and Elena Smirnova, 59–129. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Carretero, Marta, Elena Domínguez Romero & Victoria Martín de la Rosa
2024. Reported Speech in Opinion Newspaper Articles and Political Speeches: An English/Spanish Contrastive Approach. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics, ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Meier, Franz
2023. Marking the sources of knowledge, asserting the epistemic stance. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 37 ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Nießner, Tobias, Daniel H. Gross & Matthias Schumann
2022. Evidential Strategies in Financial Statement Analysis: A Corpus Linguistic Text Mining Approach to Bankruptcy Prediction. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:10 ► pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & María Sol Sansiñena
2022. How sentence type influences the interpretation of Spanish future constructions. Functions of Language 29:1 ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Jinyi & Jinjun Wang
2021. Evidentiality in science from specialization to popularization: A case study of COVID-19 texts. Journal of World Languages 7:1 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Jaakola, Minna
2021. Marking one’s own viewpoint: The Finnish evidential verb+kseni‘as far as I understand’ construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Ruskan, Anna & Marta Carretero
2021. A cross-linguistic look at the right periphery. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 415 ff. DOI logo
Garachana, Mar & María Sol Sansiñena
2020.  Va a ser que no . Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Millar, Sharon, Rasmus Nielsen, Anna Vibeke Lindø & Klaus Geyer
2020. The use of hyperlinking as evidential practice in Danish online hate speech. Pragmatics and Society 11:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2018. Evidentiality and the TAM systems in English and Spanish. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197], ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2021. Variation of evidential values in discourse domains. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158], ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bibliographie. In Les routines discursives dans le discours scientifique oral et écrit, ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue