In:Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 171–192
Chapter 7Potential vs Use
Revisiting an evidential participial construction in Lithuanian
Published online: 21 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.08uso
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.08uso
Abstract
The paper deals with the existing potential of the grammatical realizations of evidentiality (so-called “passive evidentials”) in Lithuanian, which has been described theoretically in literature; however there are no studies that would attest to the frequency and patterns of actual use of this construction in authentic contemporary Lithuanian. The analysis has been carried out in the light of the theoretical approach (Boye and Harder 2009; Boye 2012) and the template of the database of evidential markers in European languages (Wiemer and Stathi 2010). The study employs corpus based quantitative and qualitative methodology in order to investigate the distributional patterns of the -ma/-ta construction in different types of discourse. Though -ma/-ta participles are very frequent in contemporary Lithuanian, their use in the evidential construction is very rare.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Data and method
- 1.1.1Data selection criteria
- 1.2Indirect evidentiality – an epistemic qualification
- 1.1Data and method
- 2.Results and discussion
- 3.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements List of abbreviations Notes References
References (33)
. 2007. “Information Source and Evidentiality: What Can We Conclude?” Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 207–227.
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskih jazykov. (Comparative syntax of participles in Baltic languages). Vilnius: Mokslas.
. (ed.). 1996. Lietuvių kalbos gramatika. (Lithuanian Grammar). Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text Driven Approach.” Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder. 2009. “Evidentiality: Linguistic Categories and Grammaticalization.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 9–43.
Collins, Peter. 2001. “Some Discourse Functions of Existentials in English.” In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–6. <[URL]> (06 March 2015)
Geniušienė, Emma. 2006. “Passives in Lithuanian (in Comparison with Russian).” In Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, ed. by Abraham Werner, and Lariso Leisiö, 29–61. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gronemeyer, Claire. 1997. “Evidentiality in Lithuanian.” Working Papers, Lund University, 46: 93–112.
Holvoet, Axel. 2004. “Evidencialumo kategorija.” (“The Category of Evidentiality”). In Gramatinių kategorijų tyrimai, ed. by Axel Holvoet, and Loreta Semėnienė, 105–120. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, and Bernard Wälchli. 2001. “The Circum-Baltic Languages: Areal- Typological Approach.” In The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact, vol. 2, ed. by Östen Dahl, and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, 615–750. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2010. “Mood and a Transitivity Restriction in Lithuanian: The Case of the Inferential Evidential.” Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.
Luraghi, Silvia, and Seppo Kittilä. 2014. “The Typology and Diachrony of Partitives.” In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, ed. by Silvia Luraghi, and Tuomas Huumo, 17–62. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Noël, Dirk. 2001. “The Passive Matrices of English Infinitival Complement Clauses. Evidentials on the Road to Auxiliarihood?” Studies in Language 25 (2): 255–296.
Ørsnes, Bjarne. 2011. “Passives and Evidentiality: Danish Reportive Passives and their Equivalents in German.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 43 (1): 21–59.
Ruskan, Anna. 2012. “Evidential Adjectives in Lithuanian Academic Discourse.” Kalbotyra 64 (3): 103–123.
. (this volume). “Markers of Evidentiality in Lithuanian Newspaper Discourse.”
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, and Verner Egerland. 2009. “Impersonal Null-subjects in Icelandic and Elsewhere.” Studia Linguistica 63 (1): 158–185.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Usonienė, Aurelija. 2013. “On the Morphosyntactic Status of Complement-Taking Predicate Clauses in Lithuanian.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 45 (1): 73–99.
. 2015. “Non-morphological Realizations of Evidentiality: the Case of Parenthetical Elements in Lithuanian.” In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, ed. by Peter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet and Björn Wiemer, 437–464. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Usonienė, Aurelia, and Audrone Soliene 2012. “Choice of Strategies in Realizations of Epistemic Possibility in English and Lithuanian.” In Corpus Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, ed. by Stefania Marzo, Kris Heylen, and Gert De Sutter, 141–166. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wiemer, Björn. 2006. “Grammatical Evidentiality in Lithuanian (A typological assessment).” Baltistica 36: 33–49.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica
Usonienė, Aurelija & Nigel Vincent
2018. Non-finiteness, complementation and evidentiality. In
Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197], ► pp. 239 ff.
Usonienė, Aurelija & Audronė Šolienė
2017. Reportive evidentials in English and Lithuanian. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 177 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
