In:Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 13–55
Chapter 1Evidentiality in Cognitive Grammar
Published online: 21 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.02lan
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.02lan
Abstract
A clause serves the intersubjective function of presenting and negotiating a proposition. It both describes an occurrence and gives some indication of its epistemic status. The latter consists primarily in an assessment of whether the occurrence is realized, but may also include the basis for this assessment, and since there is no sharp distinction between the two, evidentiality constitutes a dimension of clausal grounding. Both dimensions of grounding are organized egocentrically in terms of immediacy to the ground and increments of distance from it. In a broad sense, grounding is also effected by lexical and grammatical means. These represent a higher level of functional organization concerned not with the occurrence of events but with the validity of propositions.
Keywords: distance, egocentricity, epistemic assessment, function, grounding, proposition
Article outline
- 1.Issues
- 2.Evidentiality and grounding
- 2.1Semantic functions and their implementation
- 2.2Clausal grounding
- 2.3Evidentials as grounding elements
- 2.4Unification
-
3.Grounding systems
- 3.1Systems, substrate, and strata
- 3.2A tense-modal system
- 3.3Evidential systems
- 3.4Combined systems
- 4.Means of implementation
- 4.1Lexical means
- 4.2Periphrastic means
- 4.3Diachrony
- 5.Conclusion
References
References (41)
Achard, Michel. 1998. Representation of Cognitive Structures: Syntax and Semantics of French Sentential Complements. Cognitive Linguistics Research 11. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. “Evidentiality in Tariana.” In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, and Robert M. W. Dixon, 131–164. Typological Studies in Language 54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds). 2003. Studies in Evidentiality. Typological Studies in Language 54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer (eds). 2000. Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder. 2007. “Complement-Taking Predicates: Usage and Linguistic Structure.” Studies in Language 31: 569–606.
. 2009. “Evidentiality: Linguistic Categories and Grammaticalization.” Functions of Language 16: 9–43.
Brisard, Frank (ed.) 2002. Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Cognitive Linguistics Research 21. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cornillie, Bert. 2009. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: On the Close Relationship Between Two Different Categories.” Functions of Language 16: 44–62.
Diessel, Holger, and Michael Tomasello. 2001. “The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-Based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 12: 97–141.
Floyd, Rick. 1996a. “The Radial Structure of the Wanka Reportative.” In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by Eugene H. Casad, 895–941. Cognitive Linguistics Research 6. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 1996b. “Experience, Certainty and Control, and the Direct Evidential in Wanka Quechua Questions.” Functions of Language 3: 69–93.
Haiman, John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in Mind and Society: A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics Research 41. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2009. Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality and Modality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. “Fact.” In Progress in Linguistics, ed. by Manfred Bierwisch, and Karl Erich Heidolph, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2002a. “A Study in Unified Diversity: English and Mixtec Locatives.” In Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Grammar and Culture, ed. by N. J. Enfield, 138–161. Oxford and London: Oxford University Press.
2002b. “The Control Cycle: Why Grammar is a Matter of Life and Death.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association 2: 193–220.
2002c. “Deixis and Subjectivity.” In Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, ed. by Frank Brisard, 1–28. Cognitive Linguistics Research 21. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
2005a. “Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning.” In Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, ed. by Diane Pecher, and Rolf A. Zwaan, 164–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2005b. “Integration, Grammaticization, and Constructional Meaning.” In Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots, ed. by Mirjam Fried, and Hans C. Boas, 157–189. Constructional Approaches to Language 4. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics Research 42. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
2013b. “Modals: Striving for Control.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, 3–55. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
2015a. “How to Build an English Clause”. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 2 (2).
2015b. ”
Descriptive and Discursive Organization in Cognitive Grammar.” In Change of Paradigms—New Paradoxes: Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics
, ed. by Joceleyne Daems, Eline Zenner, Kris Heylen, Dirk Speelman, and Hubert Cuyckens, 205-218. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 31. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
McLendon, Sally. 2003. “Evidentials in Eastern Pomo with a Comparative Survey of the Category in Other Pomoan Languages.” In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, and Robert M. W. Dixon, 101–129. Typological Studies in Language 54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pecher, Diane, and Rolf A. Zwaan (eds). 2005. Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch, and Barbara B. Lloyd, 27–47. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1996. “Fictive Motion in Language and ‘Ception’.” In Language and Space, ed. by Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel, and Merrill F. Garrett, 211–276. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “‘Object Complements’ and Conversation: Towards a Realistic Account.” Studies in Language 26: 125–164.
Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. “Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a Comparative Overview of the Category in Panoan.” In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, and Robert M. W. Dixon, 33–61. Typological Studies in Language 54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Alberti, Gábor, Anna Szeteli, Judit Kleiber & Eszter Kárpáti
Kratochvílová, Dana
WANG, YI’NA & WEIQIAN LIU
Fernández Jaén, Jorge
2023. The present tense as a mark of evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Spanish. In Verb and Context [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 34], ► pp. 131 ff.
Nikolaienko, Valeriia
Nikolaienko, Valeriia
Jaakola, Minna
Siyavoshi, Sara & Sherman Wilcox
Wilcox, Sherman & Rocío Martínez
周, 梦茹
Alberti, Gábor, Mónika Dóla, Eszter Kárpáti, Judit Kleiber, Anna Szeteli & Anita Viszket
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2018. Evidentiality and the TAM systems in English and Spanish. In
Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197], ► pp. 83 ff.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2021. Variation of evidential values in discourse domains. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158], ► pp. 233 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
