Cover not available

In:Relevance Theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 268] 2016
► pp. 307–320

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Some directions for future research in relevance-theoretic pragmatics

 | University of Seville
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.268.12cru
References (71)
References
Arundale, Robert B. 2006. “Face as Relational and Interactional: A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework and Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2 (2): 193–216.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “On the descriptive ineffability of expressive meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3537–3550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Miriam Locher (eds). 2008. Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. The Hague: Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Scott W., and Yong J. Park. 2008. “Social Implications of Mobile Telephony: The Rise of Personal Communication Society.” Sociology Compass 2 (2): 371–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2012. “Word Meaning and Concept Expressed.” The Linguistic Review 29 (4): 607–623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn, and Catherine Wearing. 2012. “Metaphor, Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic Approach.” Language and Cognition 3 (2): 283–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Relevance Theory and Language Change.” Lingua 175–176: 139–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1575–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell Vidal, M. Victoria. 1996. “Towards a Cognitive Approach to Politeness.” Language Sciences 18: 629–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Norms and Principles. Putting Social and Cognitive Pragmatics Together.” In Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by Rosina Márquez-Reiter and María Elena Placencia, 347–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2006. “Powerlessness and Social Interpretation.” Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (1–2): 96–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Power & the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2011. “Computer-mediated Communication.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights. Volume 9: Pragmatics in Practice, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 93–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin, and Dennis Whitcomb (eds). 2011. Social Epistemology. Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddock, Adrian, Alan Millar, and Duncan Pritchard (eds). 2010. Social Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2007. “The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 3 (2): 295–317.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. (ed.). 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2009. “Newspaper Headlines and Relevance: Ad hoc Concepts in Ad hoc Contexts.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (4): 699–720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jary, Mark. 1998. “Relevance Theory and the Communication of Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Two Types of Implicature: Material and Behavioural.” Mind & Language 28 (5): 638–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1997. “Impoliteness and Emotional Arguments.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (2): 243–265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2006. “Polite Behaviour within Relational Work: The Discursive Approach to Politeness.” Multilingua, Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 25 (3): 249–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maruenda Bataller, Sergio. 2002. Reformulations and Relevance Theory Pragmatics: The Case of TV Interviews. Valencia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mascaro, Olivier, and Dan Sperber. 2009. “The Moral, Epistemic, and Mindreading Components of Children’s Vigilance towards Deception.” Cognition 112 (3): 367–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzarella, Diana. 2015. “Politeness, Relevance and Scalar Inferences.” Journal of Pragmatics 79: 93–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelian, Kourken. 2013. “The Evolution of Testimony: Receiver Vigilance, Speaker Honesty and the Reliability of Communication.” Episteme 10 (1): 37–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Origgi, Gloria. 2013. “Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust.” Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 26 (2): 221–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2003. “A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Introduction of Scandinavian Pronouns in English.” In Interaction and Cognition in Linguistics, ed. by Carlos 
Inchaurralde and Celia Florén, 123–134. Hamburg: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Relevance Theory and Historical Linguistics: Towards a Pragmatic Approach to the Morphological Changes in the Preterite from Old English to Middle English.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 51: 181–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemic Vigilance, Cautious Optimism and Sophisticated Understanding.” Research in Language 10 (4): 365–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Understanding and Overcoming Pragmatic Failure in Intercultural Communication: From Focus on Speakers to Focus on Hearers.” IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51 (1): 23–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Meta-psychological Awareness of Comprehension and Epistemic Vigilance of L2 Communication in Interlanguage Pragmatic Development.” Journal of Pragmatics 59 (A): 117–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Pragmatic Failure, Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Vigilance.” Language & Communication 39: 34–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “On the Role of Vigilance in the Interpretation of Puns.” Humor 28 (3): 469–490.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Vigilance Mechanisms in Interpretation: Hermeneutical Vigilance.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 133 (1): 21–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solska, Agnieszka. 2012a. “Relevance-theoretic Comprehension Procedure and Processing Multiple Meanings in Paradigmatic Puns.” In Relevance Theory. More than Understanding, ed. by Ewa Wałaszewska and Agnieszka Piskorska, 167–182. New Castle upon Tyne: 
Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “The Relevance-based Model of Context in Processing Puns.” Research in Language 10 (4): 387–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1994. “Understanding Verbal Understanding.” In What is Intelligence? ed. by Jean Khalifa, 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Speakers Are Honest because Hearers are Vigilant. Reply to Kourken Michaelian.” Episteme 10 (1): 61–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25 (4): 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taillard, Mary-Odile. 2000. “Persuasive Communication: The Case of Marketing.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 145–172Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, Laura Lengel, and Alice Tomic. 2004. Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Interaction and The Internet. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wałaszewska, Ewa. 2011. “Broadening and Narrowing in Lexical Development: How Relevance Theory Can Account for Children’s Overextensions and Underextensions.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 314–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “That Bloody So-and-So Has Retired: Expressives Revisited.” Lingua 174–175: 20–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2005. “New Directions for Research on Pragmatics and Modularity.” Lingua 115 (8): 1129–1146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Modality and the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction.” In Relevance Theory. More than Understanding, ed. by Ewa Wałaszewska and Agnieszka Piskorska, 23–43. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Irony Comprehension: A Developmental Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 59 (A): 40–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston. 2006. “Metaphor, Relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue.” Mind & Language 21 (3): 404–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 1993. “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 90 (1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Tim Wharton. 2006. “Relevance and Prosody.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1559–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus Ramos, Francisco. 1998. “A Decade of Relevance Theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 305–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999a. “Towards a Pragmatic Taxonomy of Misunderstandings.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 38: 218–239.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999b. “Misunderstandings and Explicit/Implicit Communication.” Pragmatics 9 (4): 487–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Ciberpragmática. El uso del lenguaje en Internet. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2003. “Humor and the Search for Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9): 1295–1331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “A Relevance-theoretic Classification of Jokes.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1): 131–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus Ramos, Francisco. 2014. “Not All Emoticons Are Created Equal.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14 (3): 511–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue