In:Relevance Theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 268] 2016
► pp. 173–190
Distinguishing rhetorical from ironical questions
A relevance-theoretic account
Published online: 20 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.268.07rae
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.268.07rae
This chapter seeks to differentiate ironical questions from rhetorical questions, as they are often thought to share apparent similarities. Ironical questions are often taken as types of rhetorical questions because they orient towards an obvious answer and have some persuasive power. A relevance-theoretic account, however, shows that ironical questions result in different interpretive effects from those rhetorical questions yield. While rhetorical questions intentionally assert an implicit proposition bearing relevance, in ironical questions such a proposition is not relevant in itself, though it is still communicated. Ironical questions are contextually inaccurate and do not satisfy expectations of optimal relevance. The contextual absurdity of pragmatic expectations gives rise to specific attitudinal and non-propositonal effects.
References (25)
Bonhomme, Marc. 2005. “Flou et Polyvalence de la Question Rhétorique: L’Exemple des Fables de La Fontaine.” In Les états de la question, ed. by Corinne Rossari, et al., 191–209. Québec: Nota Bene.
Clark, Herbert, and Richard Gerrig. 1984. “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1): 121–126.
Goto, Risa. 2011. “Relevance Theoretic Analysis of the Properties and Understanding Process of Rhetorical Questions.” Annual Report of Graduate Division of Human Culture 26: 1–14.
Gutiérrez Rexach, Javier. 1998. “Rhetorical Questions, Relevance and Scales.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11: 139–156.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1991. “L’Acte de Question et l’Acte d’Assertion: Opposition Discrète ou Continuum?” In La question, ed. by Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 87–111. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
Raeber, Thierry. 2011. L’Ironie; Réactualisation de Pensée et Contenus non Posés: Une Approche Pragmatique. MA diss., University of Neuchâtel.
Recchia, Holly E., Nina Howe, Hildy S. Ross, and Shirley Alexander. 2010. “Children’s Understanding and Production of Verbal Irony in Family Conversations.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28 (2): 255–274.
Rohde, Hannah. 2006. “Rhetorical Questions as Redundant Interrogatives.” San Diego Linguistic Papers 2: 133–168.
Sadock, Jerry M. 1971. “Queclaratives.” Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 223–232.
Saussure, Louis de. 2012. “Cognitive Pragmatic Ways into Discourse Analysis. The Case of Discursive Presuppositions.” Łodz Papers in Pragmatics 8 (1): 37–60.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Simonin, Olivier. 2006. “Ironie: Voie Etrange et Voix Etrangères.” Bulletin de la Société de Stylistique Anglaise 27: 27–44.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1981. “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116 (10): 1722–1743.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Giora, Rachel, Inbal Jaffe, Israela Becker & Ofer Fein
2018. Strongly attenuating highly positive concepts. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
