Cover not available

In:Emotion in Multilingual Interaction
Edited by Matthew T. Prior and Gabriele Kasper
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 266] 2016
► pp. 203–236

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Formulating and scaling emotionality in L2 qualitative research interviews

 | Arizona State University
Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.266.09pri
From a corpus of ‘troubles-tellings’ (Jefferson 1988) generated in qualitative research interviews with L2 (second language) English-speaking adult immigrants in the US and Canada, this case study examines how formulation and intensification, supported by various linguistic and paralinguistic resources, enable story teller (interviewee) and story recipient (interviewer) to intersubjectively categorize and manage the affect-laden descriptions of people and events set within particular institutional, interactional, psychological, and moral worlds. As a result, emotionality is shown to be more than an outcome of L2 users’ sociolinguistic experiences but a series of highly coordinated actions that progress the interview activity and make accountable as well as account for a complex network of social conduct and categorial relations.
References (58)
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe. 1998. Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool. In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe, 1–14. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Carolyn. D. 1997. “Ticketing Rules: Categorization and Moral Ordering in a School Staff Meeting.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester, and Peter Eglin, 77–98. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bercelli, Fabrizio, Federico Rossano, and Maurizio Viaro. 2008. “Clients’ Responses to Therapists’ Re-interpretations.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 43–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besnier, Nico. 1990. “Language and Affect.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack. 2009. “Taxonomies Are for Talking: A Reanalysis of a Sacks Classic.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (8): 1600–1610. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Scaling as an Aspect of Formulation in Verbal Interaction.” In Language Learning and Socialization through Conversations, ed. by Yuriko Kite and Keiko Ikeda, 3–9. Osaka Japan: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Occasioned Semantics: A Systematic Approach to Meaning in Talk.” Human Studies 34: 129–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burch, Alfred R., and Gabriele Kasper. (this volume). “‘Like Godzilla’: Enactments and Formulations in Telling a Disaster Story in Japanese.”
Buttny, Richard. 2004. Talking Problems: Studies of Discursive Construction. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cekaite, Asta. (this volume). “Emotional Stances and Interactional Competence: Learning to Calibrate Disagreements, Objections, and Refusals.”
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2007. Assessing and Accounting. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Rebecca Clift, and Elizabeth Holt, 81–119. Cambridge: ¨Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “A Sequential Approach to Affect: The Case of ‘Disappointment’.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Kathryn. 1986. “The Process of Problem (Re)Formulation in Psychotherapy.” Sociology of Health & Illness 8: 44–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1998. Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3“4): 295–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Emotion Discourse.” Culture and Psychology 5 (3): 271–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities. Discourse and Society 18 (1): 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 1997. “Complaint Stories.” In Constructing Emotional Reciprocity among Women Communicating Gender in Context, ed. by Helga Kotthoff, and Ruth Wodak, 179–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellermann, John. 2009. “Practices for Dispreferred Responses Using No by a Learner of English.” IRAL 47: 95–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and D. Rod Watson. 1979. Formulations as Conversational Objectives. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin (eds). 1997. Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena. 1984. Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1988. “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Language , Interaction, and Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele, and Matthew T. Prior. 2015. “Analyzing Storytelling in TESOL Interview Research.” TESOL Quarterly 49 (2): 226–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1984. “Intensity.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 43–70. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967/1997. “Narrative Analysis.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Bronwen, and Felizitas Ringham. 2006. Key Terms in Semiotics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Eleanor and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 1989. “Language Has a Heart.” Text 9 (1): 7–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar. 2008. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M. 1984. “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. “Extreme-case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2/3): 219–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, Matthew T. 2011. Self-Presentation in L2 Interview Talk: Narrative Versions, Accountability, and Emotionality. Applied Linguistics 32 (1): 60–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Re-Examining Alignment in a ˜Failed™ L2 Autobiographic Research Interview. Qualitative Inquiry 20 (4): 495–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Emotion and Discourse in L2 Narrative Research. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rae, John. 2008. “Lexical Substitution as a Therapeutic Resource.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 62–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapley, Timothy. 2012. “The (Extra)Ordinary Practices of Qualitative Interviewing.” In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (2nd ed.), ed. by Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti, and Karyn D. McKinney, 541–554. London: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roulston, Kathryn. 2010. Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice. London: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Pedagogy of Interviewing.” In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (2nd ed.), ed. by Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti, and Karyn D. McKinney, 61–74. London: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna. 2013. “Emotion, Affect, and Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 330–349. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 1–2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1987. “Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 101–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Whose Text? Whose Context?” Discourse & Society 8 (2): 165–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 205–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 2001. Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning, and Context. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. ¨Hamilton, 54–75. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. “Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis.” Discourse Studies 14 (3): 277–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toerien, Merran, and Celia Kitzinger. 2007. “Emotional Labor in Action: Navigating Multiple Involvements in the Beauty Salon.” Sociology 41: 645–662. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger. 2006. “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69 (2): 150–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Stępkowska, Agnieszka
2025. Emotional impact on language practices of bilingual couples: A study of discursive positioning. International Journal of Bilingualism 29:1 ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2020. The discussion of abortion in US political debates: A study in occasioned semantics. Discourse Studies 22:3 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Hayashi, Reiko
2019. Categorization for occasioned semantics: Reanalysis of a Japanese Yamagata 119 emergency call. Discourse Studies 21:5 ► pp. 495 ff. DOI logo
Kasper, Gabriele & Steven J. Ross
2018. The social life of methods: Introducing the special issue. Applied Linguistics Review 9:4 ► pp. 475 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue