In:Emotion in Multilingual Interaction
Edited by Matthew T. Prior and Gabriele Kasper
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 266] 2016
► pp. 57–85
Like Godzilla
Enactments and formulations in telling a disaster story in Japanese
Published online: 3 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.266.03bur
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.266.03bur
The chapter examines how a second language speaker of Japanese tells a disaster story to an L1 Japanese-speaking recipient in ordinary conversation. Drawing on Goodwin’s (2013) notions of lamination and substrates, the study shows how the teller and recipient orient to the story as a stance object by selecting, assembling, and recycling different types of multisemiotic resources, including language forms, cultural references, prosody, ideophonic vocalizations, and embodied action such as gaze, facial expression, and gesture. By displaying emotions of different quality and intensity, and doing so with different configurations of semiotic practices, at different sequential moments, the participants show what they understand the current activity within the telling to be.
References (45)
Akita, Kimi. 2010. “An Embodied Semantic Analysis of Psychological Mimetics in Japanese.” Linguistics 48: 1195–1220.
Baba, Junko. 2003. “Pragmatic Function of Japanese Mimetics in the Spoken Discourse of Varying Emotive Intensity Levels.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1861–1889.
Clancy, Patricia. 1999. “The Socialization of Affect in Japanese Mother-Child Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1397–1421.
Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1992. “Meanings of Non-referential Indexes: A Case Study of the Japanese Sentence-final Particle Ne
.” Text 12: 507–539.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth 2012. “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Fornel, Michel. 1992. “The Return Gesture: Some Remarks on Context, Inference and Iconic Gesture.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo Di Luzio, 159–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. “Advances in the Cross-linguistic Study of Ideophones.” Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672.
. 2013. “Ideophones and Gesture in Everyday Speech.” Gesture 13: 143–165.
Frazier, Stefan. 2007. “Tellings of Remembrances ‘Touched Off’ by Student Reports in Group Work in Undergraduate Writing Classes.” Applied Linguistics 28: 189–210.
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Environmentally Coupled Gestures.” In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, ed. by Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, and Elena T. Levy, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. “The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 8–23.
Goodwin, Marjorie, Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36: 109–141.
Heath, Christian, Dirk von Lehn, Jason Cleverly, and Paul Luff. 2012. “Revealing Surprise: The Local Ecology and the Transposition of Action. In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 212–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holt, Elizabeth. 2000. “Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 425–454.
Ishida, Midori. 2009. “Development of Interactional Competence: Changes in the Use of Ne in L2 Japanese During Study Abroad.” In Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. by Hanh thi Nguyen, and Gabriele Kasper, 351–385. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “‘At First I Thought’: A Normalizing Device for Extraordinary Events.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 131–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kita, Sotaro. 1997. “Two-dimensional Semantic Analysis of Japanese Mimetics.” Linguistics 35: 379–415.
Kupetz, Maxi. 2014. “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements – Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 61: 4–34.
Le Guen, Olivier. 2011. “Materiality vs. Expressivity: The Use of Sensory Vocabulary in Yucatec Maya.” The Senses and Society 6: 117–125.
Mandelbaum, Jenny. 2013. “Storytelling in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 492–507. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O’Reilly, Michelle. 2005. “‘Active Noising’: The Use of Noises in Talk, the Case of Onomatopoeia, Abstract Sounds, and the Functions They Serve in Therapy.” Text 25: 745–762.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2006. “Facial Expression in an Assessment. In Video-analysis: Methodology and Methods, ed. by Hubert J. Knoblauch, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner, and Bernt Schnettler, 127–142. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
. 2012. “Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 64–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prior, Matthew. T. (this volume). “Formulating and Scaling Emotionality in L2 Qualitative Research Interviews.”
Rae, John. 2008. “Lexical Substitution as a Therapeutic Resource.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 62–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. “Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships during Conversational Repair.” Communication Monographs 73: 137–161.
Sacks, Harvey. 1974. “Some Considerations of a Story Told in Ordinary Conversations.” Poetics 15: 127–138.
. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saigo, Hideki. 2011. The Japanese Sentence-final Particles in Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Selting, Margret. 2010. “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories.” Pragmatics 20: 229–277.
. 2012. “Complaint Stories and Subsequent Complaint Stories with Affect Displays.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 387–415.
Sidnell, Jack. 2006. “Coordinating Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 229–244.
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 31–57.
Sugita, Yuko. 2012. “Minimal Affect Uptake in a Pre-climax Position of Conversational ‘Scary’ Stories.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1273–1289.
Svennevig, Jan. 2008. “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-initiated Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 333–348.
Szatrowski, Polly. 2010. “Creating Involvement in a Large Japanese Lecture by Telling the Story of a Haiku.” In Storytelling Across Japanese Conversational Genre, ed. by Polly Szatrowski, 267–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Fukuda, Chie
2024. Interactional and categorial analyses of identity construction in the talk of female-to-male (FtM) transgender individuals in Japan. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 34:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Monfaredi, Elham
Mori, Yoshiko, Atsushi Hasegawa & Junko Mori
Yagi, Junichi
Salaberry, M. Rafael
Akita, Kimi
2019. Mimetics, gaze, and facial expression in a multimodal corpus of Japanese. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 229 ff.
Fukuda, Chie & Matthew Burdelski
KASPER, GABRIELE & JOHANNES WAGNER
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
