Cover not available

In:Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Manuela Romano and M. Dolores Porto
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 262] 2016
► pp. 215–244

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The use of metaphor and evaluation as discourse strategies in pre-electoral debates

Just about winning votes

 | University of Alcalá
Published online: 31 March 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262.09die
The present chapter analyzes metaphor use in a Spanish pre-electoral debate and its interplay with evaluation. The metaphorical expressions found are cross-­culturally contrasted with those from a previous study for English (Neagu 2013) to verify to what extent they are equivalent in English and Spanish and whether similarities are influenced by ideological factors. Furthermore, the evaluative overload of metaphors in the Spanish debate is explored by confronting them with the evaluative devices encountered in the same text after the application of Hunston’s (2000) evaluation model and Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal Theory. Results show that, although cross-cultural expression of metaphors differs at times, all politicians use them to win election, rather than due to ideological reasons. Moreover, metaphor and evaluation are often realized by the same linguistic expressions.
References (38)
References
Barcelona Sánchez, Antonio. 2001. “On the Systematic Contrastive Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors: Case Studies and Proposed Methodology.” In Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy (Vol. 29), ed. by Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven, 117–146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B. 2015. “Manipulation in Spanish and American Pre-electoral Debates: The Rajoy-Rubalcaba vs the Obama-MacCain Debates”. Intercultural Pragmatics 13(4).
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B. and Díez-Prados, Mercedes. 2014. “Positive Self-evaluation versus Negative Other-evaluation in the Political Genre or Pre-election Debates”. Discourse & Society 25 (2): 159–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caño, Antonio. 2011. “Debates: Made in USA”. El País.com, 7 November 2011, [URL](accessed 3 October 2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 17 (5): 563–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan and Timothy Ennis. 2001. “A Comparative Study of Metaphor in Spanish and English Financial Reporting.” English for Specific Purposes 20: 249–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2011. “Still Something Missing in CDA.” Discourse Studies 13 (6): 769–781. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. April 2005. “Researching Conceptual Metaphors that (may) Underlie Political Discourse.” ECPR Workshop on Metaphor in Political Science , Grenada, Spain: 1–18, [URL] (accessed 3 October 2015).
Díez-Prados, Mercedes and Ana B. Cabrejas-Peñuelas. In preparation. “Evaluation in Spanish and American Pre-election Political Debates.” Manuscript.
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Discourse.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 121–138. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain. Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2007. “Critical Discourse Analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (2): 91–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse: Status and Value in Persuasive Texts.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, Clella I. 2013. Public Speaking. Concepts & Skills for a Diverse Society. 7th ed. (International Edition). Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1992. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution ed. by Martin Pütz, 463–481. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know that Liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Minds and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Rodríguez, Irene. 2007. “The Representation of Women in Teenage and Women’s Magazines: Recurring Metaphors in English.” Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 15: 15–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and Peter R.R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 301–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neagu, Maria-Ionela. 2013. Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo López, Ana M. and Mª Ángeles Orts Llopis. 2008. “Conceptual Metaphors and Translation: A Comparative Study of Metaphors in English and Spanish Financial Reports.” In Researching and Teaching Specialized Languages: New Contexts, New Challenges, ed. by Purificación Sánchez Hernández, Pascual Pérez-Paredes, Pilar Aguado Jiménez and Raquel Criado Sánchez, 424–434. Murcia: Editum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphors in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena and Michela Masci. 1996. “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy.” Discourse & Society 7 (2): 243–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Socialist Election Victory near Impossible, Says Latest Poll”. El País in English, 4 November 2011, [URL] (accessed 3 October 2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Díez-Prados, Mercedes & Ana Belén Cabrejas-Peñuelas
2020. Construction and negotiation of voter-friendly identities in electoral debates. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 82 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Díez Prados, Mercedes
2019. Verbal and nonverbal engagement devices in business persuasive discourse. In Engagement in Professional Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 301], ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
García-Gómez, Antonio
2018. Dragons’ Den: Enacting persuasion in reality television. Discourse, Context & Media 21 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Evaluative Discourse Metaphor in Online Communities [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 106], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue