In:Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Manuela Romano and M. Dolores Porto
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 262] 2016
► pp. 79–108
The persuasive (and manipulative) power of metaphor in ‘austerity’ discourse
A corpus-based analysis of embodied and moral metaphors of austerity in the Portuguese press
Published online: 31 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262.04soa
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262.04soa
This chapter analyses the persuasive power of metaphors used in the Portuguese press to justify the implementation of harsh austerity policies. The analysis relies on a corpus of news and opinion articles published in June-July 2011, after the entry of the Troika, and May 2013, when protests against the austerity policies intensified. The study adopts a socio-cognitive view of language following the promising convergence between Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis, and the corpus-based and critical discourse-based approach to conceptual metaphor. Using the target-domain method for corpus-based metaphor identification, 1,151 austerity-related metaphorical expressions associated with eight target lexemes were gathered, which include great chain of being, image schemas, and event/action metaphors. The analysis reveals the persuasive and manipulative force of certain specific metaphors, such as obesity/diet, indebted family, good student, and sacrifice. These socially-embodied metaphors are grounding in moral cultural models and serve ideological, emotional and moral purposes.
References (54)
Bernárdez, Enrique. 2008. “Collective Cognition and Individual Activity: Variation, Language and Culture.” In Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke and Enrique Bernárdez, 137–166. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
. 2013. “What is the Purpose of Metaphor in Political Discourse? An Answer from Critical Metaphor Analysis.” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões Cognitivas e Discursivas, ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães, and Miguel Gonçalves, 69–87. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
Chilton, Paul. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang.
Dirven, René, Frank Polzenhagen and Hans-Georg Wolf. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 1222–1240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Frank, Roslyn M., René Dirven, Tom Ziemke and Enrique Bernárdez (eds). 2008. Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, Dirk and Hubert Cuyckens (eds). 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Hampe, Beate (ed). 2005. From Perception to Meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
. 2015. “Discourse.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Ewa
Dabrowska and Dagmar Divjak, 322–346. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Herrera-Soler, Honesto and Michael White (eds). 2012. Metaphor and Mills. Figurative Language in Business and Economics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
. 2013. “Socio-cognitive Approaches to Corporate Discourse.” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões Cognitivas e Discursivas, ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães and Miguel Gonçalves, 89–103. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
. 2014. “Cognitive Linguistics and Ideology.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeanette Littlemore and John R. Taylor, 234–252. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Krugman, Paul. 2010. “Myths of Austerity.” The New York Times, July 1. [URL]
. 2011. “When Austerity Fails.” The New York Times, May 22. [URL]
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1996. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
. 2004. Don’t Think of Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Moreno Lara, María Angeles. 2008. La metáfora en el lenguaje político de la prensa americana. Modelos cognitivos y formación de significado. Granada: Comares.
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oakley, Todd. 2007. “Image Schemas.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 214–235. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Peña Cervel, Sandra. 2003. Topology and Cognition: What Image Schemas Reveal about the Metaphorical Language of Emotions. München: Lincom.
Pishwa, Hanna (ed). 2009. Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rojo López, Ana María and María Ángeles Orts Llopis. 2010. “Metaphorical Pattern Analysis in Financial Texts: Framing the Crisis in Positive or Negative Metaphorical Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3300–3313.
Sardinha, Tony Berber. 2011. “Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics.” Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11 (2): 329–360.
Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2003. “Image Schemas and Category Coherence: The Case of the Portuguese Verb Deixar.” In Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, ed. by Hubert
Cuyckens, René Dirven and John R. Taylor, 281–322. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2006. O Mundo dos Sentidos em Português: Polissemia, Semântica e Cognição [The World of Senses in Portuguese: Semantic Polysemy and Cognition]. Coimbra: Almedina.
. 2013a. “O que sabemos sobre a crise económica, pela metáfora. Conceptualizações metafóricas da crise na imprensa portuguesa [What we know about the economic crisis through metaphor. Metaphorical conceptualizations of the crisis in the Portuguese press].” Revista Media & Jornalismo 23 (1): 11–34.
. 2013b. “Introdução. Comunicação política e económica: cognição e discurso [Introduction. Political and economic communication: cognition and discourse].” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas [Political and Economic Communication. Cognitive and Discursive Dimensions], ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães, and Miguel Gonçalves, 1–19. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
Steen, Gerard J. 2011. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor – Now New and Improved!” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64.
. 2014. “The Cognitive-Linguistic Revolution in Metaphor Studies.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeanette Littlemore, and John R. Taylor, 117–142. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. “Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stephan Th. Gries, 1–16. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan Th. Gries. 2006. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vereza, Solange Coelho. 2007. “Metáfora e argumentação: Uma abordagem cognitivo-discursiva [Metaphor and argumentation: A cognitive-discursive approach].” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 7 (3): 487–506.
. 2013. “Discourse, Cognition and Figurative Language: Exploring Metaphors in Political Editorials.” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões Cognitivas e Discursivas, ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães, and Miguel Gonçalves, 395–406. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha and Esa Itkonen (eds). 2008. The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
El Shazly, Reham & May Samir El Falaky
Peterssen, Silvia & Augusto Soares da Silva
2024. Polarising metaphors in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis. Journal of Language and Politics 23:4 ► pp. 588 ff.
Ventura Olivet, Yoselis & Paola Alarcón Hernández
Huang, Mimi
2020. Introduction. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87], ► pp. 1 ff.
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2020. From economic crisis to austerity policies through conceptual metaphor. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87], ► pp. 51 ff.
Alarcón Hernández, Paola, Díaz Larenas, Claudio & Vásquez Bustos, Víctor
Muelas Gil, María
Romano, Manuela
Romano, Manuela & M Dolores Porto
Soares da Silva, Augusto, Maria Josep Cuenca & Manuela Romano
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
