Cover not available

In:The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 245–273

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

‘When you came into office you said that your government would be different’

Forms and functions of quotations in mediated political discourse

 | University of Augsburg, Germany
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.10fet
The goal of this chapter is to analyse the forms and communicative functions of quotations as follow-ups in mediated political discourse where they are used strategically to achieve the following goals: (1) intensify the force of an argument, (2) demonstrate ideological coherence or non-coherence, (3) construct, reconstruct and deconstruct the credibility of self and others, and (4) express alignment and disalignment. On a more global level, quotation contribute to the construal of interdiscursitivity by beckoning the addressees out of the on-going discourse into a more or less specified prior discourse and back again, thus following-up on what has been mentioned before. In interviews, they are used to challenge the argumentative coherence and credibility of a politician (and her/his party). In British Prime Minister’s Questions and in speeches, they are used to provide relevant background information against which the deconstruction of the opponent’s ideological coherence and the reconstruction of ideological coherence of self are based.
References (35)
References
Austin, John L. 1971. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach. 2011. “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Bredel, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach, 1–33. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2013. Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Ingrid Van Alphen. 2012. “Introductory Remarks on New and Old Quotatives. In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid Van Alphen, xi–xxx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 1995. “Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability.” Journal of Communication 45(3): 118–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2006. “Narrating the Political Self in a Campaign for U.S. Congress.” Language in Society 35: 467–497.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2000. “Negotiating validity claims in political interviews.” TEXT 20(4): 1–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “‘Here is the Difference, Here is the Passion, Here is the Chance to be Part of a Great Change’: Strategic Context Importation in Political Discourse.” In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Contexts in Interaction: Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer and Petra Schumacher, 105–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “The Multilayered and Multifaceted Nature of Political Discourse.” The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. ““Judge us on what we do”: The Strategic Use of Collective we in Political Discourse.” In Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 331–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Bull, Peter. 2012. “Doing Leadership in Political Speech: Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse & Society 23(2): 127–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David 1988. “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17: 401–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 2005. “Narrative reconstructions of past experiences. Adjustments and modifications in the process of recontextualising a past experience”. In Narrative Interaction, ed. by Uta Quasthoff and Tabea Becker, 285–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar. 2012. “Follow-Ups in a Loose Argumentative Context: The Pragmatic Effectiveness of Figurative Analogy.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 165–177. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg, 2012. – [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas. 1995. “Interaction Planning and Intersubjective Adjustment of Perspectives by Communicative Genres.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Ester Goody, 175–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meierkord, Christiane and Anita Fetzer. 2002. “Introduction: Sequence, Sequencing, Sequential Organization and Sequentiality.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen. 2011. “Two dogmas on Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Bredel, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach, 249–276. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1980. Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinberger, David. 2011. Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Marcelo Dascal. 1991. “On Clues and Cues: Strategies of Text-Understanding.” Journal of Literary Semantics 20(1): 18–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Fang, Shuoyu
2024. Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey: The Pragmatics of Adaptability . Intercultural Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Fang, Shuoyu
2024. Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey: The Pragmatics of Adaptability . Intercultural Pragmatics 21:5 ► pp. 701 ff. DOI logo
Jalilifar, Alireza & Nadia Mayahi
2024. Functions of Quotations During President Seyyed Ebrahim Raisi’s Address in the 2023 United Nations General Assembly: Perspectives from the Appraisal Model. In Not My Words [The Language of Politics, ], ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Kesgin, Barış
2024. Tailoring Quotations to Audiences: Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan at Youth and Muhtar Meetings. In Not My Words [The Language of Politics, ], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Kleinke, Sonja
2023.  Top-down meets bottom-up . In Remedies against the Pandemic [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 102], ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda
2023. Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
2020. “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Peter Bull
2019. Quoting ordinary people in Prime Minister’s Questions1. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2019. ‘Punch and Judy’ Politics? Embodying Challenging Courses of Action in Parliament. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2018. “Our Chief Political Editor reads between the lines of the Chancellor’s Budget speech”. Internet Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2020. “The hon. Gentleman says this is rubbish; it is absolutely true”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2021.  Quotation, meta-data and transparency of sources in mediated political discourse. In The Pragmatics of Adaptability [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 319], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2024. Quotation headlines in the printed British quality press. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2025.  Being sensible is now a radical concept I LOVE that quote haha . Internet Pragmatics 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Elda Weizman
2018. ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is ...’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society 29:5 ► pp. 495 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke O.
2018. Direct quotations in Nigerian investigative public hearings . Text & Talk 38:4 ► pp. 503 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue