Cover not available

In:Pragmatic Markers in Irish English
Edited by Carolina P. Amador-Moreno, Kevin McCafferty and Elaine Vaughan
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 258] 2015
► pp. 156–175

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

“’Tis mad, yeah”

Turn openers in Irish and British English

Published online: 15 July 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.258.07mcc
The study of pragmatic markers has stressed their function of relating segments of discourse one to the other, including the functions of response to previous talk and the marking of stance. This chapter investigates the turn-opening slot as an important locus for pragmatic marking. Tao’s (2003) work on turn-openings concluded that turn-openers were primarily lexical and linked with prior talk. McCarthy’s (2002) study of single-word lexical response tokens revealed variation in the use of tokens between British and North American English but that work did not cover turn-openers in general. The present chapter compares turn-openers in informal Irish and British English, focusing on lexically freestanding pragmatic markers. The chapter discusses variety-specific items in their role as turn-initial pragmatic markers.
References (43)
References
Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald A., and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Brian, and Michael McCarthy. 2015. “The Pragmatics of Co-Constructed Turn Taking.” In A Handbook of Corpus Pragmatics, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Ruehlemann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drummond, Kent, and Robert Hopper. 1993. “Backchannels Revisited: Acknowledgement Tokens and Speakership Incipiency.” Research On Language and Social Interaction 26 (2): 157–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, and George Niederehe. 1974. “On Signalling That It’s Your Turn To Speak.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10 (3): 234–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey. 1974. “On The Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction During Speaker Turns.” Language in Society 3 (2): 161–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick. 1986. “Listening and Speaking.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1985, Ed. by Deborah Tannen and James Alatis, 249–319. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, Britt. 1986. “Some Pragmatic Expressions in English Conversation.” In English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium, ed. by Gunnel Tottie and Ingergerd. Backlund, 131–147. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evison, Jane. 2013. “A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Turn-Openings in Spoken Academic Discourse: Understanding Discursive Specialisation.” English Profile Journal 3, January 2013, e4. Available online at [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farr, Fiona, Bróna Murphy, and Anne O’Keeffe. 2002. “The Limerick Corpus of Irish English: Design, Description and Application.” Teanga 21: 5–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, Alan. 1996. “The Discursive Accomplishment of Normality: On ‘Lingua Franca’ English and Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 26 (2): 237–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia. 2004. “Contingency and Units in Interaction.” Discourse Studies 6 (1): 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “An Approach to Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (3): 383–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fries, Charles. 1952. The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod. 1997. “The Listener and Minimal Responses in Conversational Interaction.” Prospect 12 (2): 12–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Between Speaking and Listening: The Vocalisation of Understandings.” Applied Linguistics 19 (2): 204–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko, Michiko Yaguchi, and Yasumasa Baba. 2011. “Principal Component Analysis of Turn-Initial Words in Spoken Interactions.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 26 (2): 139–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1986. “Notes On ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 153–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerekes, Julie. 2007. “The Co-Construction of a Gate-Keeping Encounter: an Inventory of Verbal Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (11): 1942–973. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 1993. “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 19 (5): 435–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1989. Japanese Conversation: Self-Contextualization through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Good Listenership Made Plain: British and American Non-Minimal Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation.” In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, ed. by Randi Reppen, Susan Fitzmaurice and Douglas Biber, 49–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Spoken fluency revisited.” English Profile Journal 1 1. e4. Online at: [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, and Svenja Adolphs. 2008. “Using a Corpus To Look At Variational Pragmatics: Response Tokens in British and Irish Discourse.” In Variational Pragmatics, ed. by Klaus Schneider and Anne Barron, 69–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 2009. Oxford English Dictionary. Second Edition on CD-ROM v. 4.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schlegoff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Semantics for the Organisation of Turn Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel. 1982. “Discourse as Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things That Come Between Sentences.” In Analysing Discourse. Text and Talk, ed. by Deborah. Tannen, 71–93. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Iinteraction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Eleanor Ochs, Emmanuel Schegloff and Sandra Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbe, Maria. 1998. “Are You listening? Cultural Influences On the Use of Supportive Verbal Feedback in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (3): 257–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2003. “Turn Initiators in Spoken English: A Corpus-based Approach to Interaction and Grammar.” Language and Computers 46: 187–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. “The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction.” Discourse Studies 74 (5): 481–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 1991. “Conversational Style in British and American English: The Case of Backchannels.” In English Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg, 254–271. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna. 1997. “Studying Language Use as Collaboration.” In Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Gabrielle Kasper and Eric Kellerman, 238–274. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yngve, Victor. 1970. “On Getting a Word in Edgewise.” Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 567–577. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, Richard. 2000. “Interactional Competence: Challenges for Validity.” Paper presented at a joint symposium on ‘Interdisciplinary interfaces with language testing’, AAAL and the Language Testing Research Colloquium, Vancouver, Canada, March 11. Online at: [URL] (accessed 04.10.2012).
Zimmerman, Don. 1993. “Acknowledgement Tokens and Speakership Incipiency Revisited.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (2): 179–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

O’Keeffe, Anne
2023. Irish English Corpus Linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Irish English, ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
P. Amador-Moreno, Carolina
2023. Discourse-Pragmatic Markers in Irish English. In The Oxford Handbook of Irish English, ► pp. 426 ff. DOI logo
Ní Mhurchú, Aoife
2018. What’s Left to Say About Irish English Progressives? “I’m Not Going Having Any Conversation with You”. Corpus Pragmatics 2:3 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
VAUGHAN, ELAINE, MICHAEL MCCARTHY & BRIAN CLANCY
2017. Vague category markers as turn‐final items in Irish English. World Englishes 36:2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. The Sociophonetics of Dublin English [Studies in Language Variation, 30], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue