Cover not available

In:Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions
Edited by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256] 2015
► pp. 259–280

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Enhancing citizen engagement

Political weblogs and participatory democracy

Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.11rib
This chapter discusses the function of blogs as tools enhancing citizen participation in political communication. Adopting the perspective of corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis, a set of blogs from the US presidential election campaign are analysed in order to determine the frequency of reference to the candidates, the parties, as well as the bloggers themselves. The analysis of pronoun choice, verbs and modality indicate that blogs enhance participation rhetoric. The data further indicate that citizen bloggers attach more importance to individual political figures than party bloggers do. The tendency to refer to the candidates rather than to their political affiliation may be explained as evidence that people not belonging to parties interpret politics as a struggle between different politicians and not between different ideologies. Since the language representation of the political scene in citizens’ blogs shows distinct traces of the ongoing process of personalization of politics, the political blog can be considered as a “tool of citizen empowerment”.
References (38)
References
Bateman, John A. 2008. Modality and Genre. A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of the Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis. 2000. “Mire usted Sr. González… Personal deixis in Spanish Political-Electoral Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruns, Axel, and Joanne Jacobs (eds). 2006. Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2006. “Who are We and Who are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.” Text and Talk 26 (1): 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2010. “Self-Mediation: New Media and Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (4): 227–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Kim E., and Kenneth J. Gergen (eds). 1985. The Social Construction of the Person. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dieltjens, Sylvain, and Priscilla Heynderickx. 2007. “Strategic Uses of the Pronoun We in Business Communication.” In Discourse, Ideology and Specialized Communication, ed. by ­Giuliana Garzone and Srikant Sarangi, 233–247. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 1991. “Categories are for Talking: On the Cognitive and Discursive Bases of Categorization.” Theory and Psychology 1 (4): 515–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. “Whorf’s Empty Gasoline Drum and the Pope’s Missing Wife.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 215–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Discursive Psychology.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch and R. E. Sanders, 257–273. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli. 2004. “What Can Corpus Linguistics Do for Critical Discourse Analysis?” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley and Louann Haarman, 351–368. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. 1991. The Saturated Self, Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Realities and Relationships, Soundings in Social Construction. ­Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennessy, Cari Lynn, and Paul S. Martin. 2006. “Blogs, the Mainstream Media, and the War in Iraq.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference , Philadelphia, 28–31 August.
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iñigo-Mora, Isabel. 2004. “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maitland, Kand, and John Wilson. 1987. “Ideological Conflict and Pronominal Resolution.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 495–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael. P. 2012. “Turnout in the 2012 Presidential Elections.” The Huffington Post, 11 February 2013. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pole, Antoinette. 2010. Blogging the Political. Politics and Participation in a Networked Society. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pyykkö, Ritta. 2002. “Who is ‘us’ in Russian Political Discourse.” In Us and Others. Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures, ed. by Anna Duszak, 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London, Newbury Park, Beverly Hills and New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riboni, Giorgia. 2011. “The Successful 2008 Presidential Candidate: How Political Weblogs Have Contributed in Shaping the American Electorate’s Preferences.” In Displaying Competence in Organizations: Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Priscilla Heynderickx, Katja ­Pelsmaekers, Craig Rollo, and Tom van Hout, 60–89. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schotter, John. 1975. Images of Man in Psychological Research. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Social Accountability and Selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2008. WordSmith Tools [URL]
Simpson, Paul. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Linguistics. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Words and Phrases. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trippi, Joe. 2008. The Revolution Will Not Be Televised. Democracy, the Internet and the Overthrow of Everything. New York: Harper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2002. “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” In Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul A. Chilton and C. Schäffner, 203–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 1995. “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallsten, Kevin. 2005. “Political Blogs and the Bloggers Who Blog Them: Is the Political Blogosphere and [sic] Echo Chamber?” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference , Washington, DC, 1–4 September.
Woodly, Deva. 2008. “New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation.” Public Choice 134: 109–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue