In:Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and withholding in institutional interaction
Edited by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier and John Moore
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 255] 2015
► pp. 239–270
Linguistic and interactional restrictions in an outpatient clinic
The challenge of delivering the diagnosis and explaining the aetiology of functional neurological problems
Published online: 27 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.255.08mon
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.255.08mon
Interactions with patients with functional neurological symptoms are considered particularly difficult by doctors. In keeping with this, neurologists orient to the challenging nature of these consultations by employing self-selected restricted linguistic and interactional practices through which they deliberately avoid the use of more direct and explicit resources. The use of restricted practices is correlated to patients’ resistance. Neurologists try to anticipate and pre-empt their patients’ resistance, or they manage it as it emerges during the consultations, to try and minimize disaffiliation and maximize patients’ alignment with their explanations. Restricted practices and avoidance display extreme caution on the part of the neurologists throughout these consultations and constitute the trademark of these interactions.
References (42)
Bergmann, Jörg R. 1992. “Veiled Morality: Notes on Discretion in Psychiatry.” In Talk at work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 137–162.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Carly, Susan Danby, and Michael Emmison. this volume. “Avoiding Giving Advice in Telephone Counselling for Children and Young People: Empowerment as Practical Action.” In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction (Pragmatics and Beyond Series), ed. by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, and John Moore. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chevalier, Fabienne. this volume. “Withholding Explicit Assessments in Tourist-Office Talk.” In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction (Pragmatics and Beyond Series), ed. by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, and John Moore. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chevalier, Fabienne H.G., and John Moore. this volume. “Interactional Restrictions Withholding and Avoidance in Institutional Talk: An Introduction.” In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities:Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction (Pragmatics and Beyond Series), ed. by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, and John Moore. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Coia, Peter, and Stephen J. Morley. 1998. “Medical Reassurance and Patients’ Responses.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 45: 377–386.
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analysing Talk at Work: an Introduction”. In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Estroff, Sue E. 1981. ““I W’z Wondering – Uhm Could Raid Uhm Effect the Brain Permanently D’y Know?’: Some Observations on the Intersection of Speaking and Writing in Calls to a Poison Control Center.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 195–226.
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Heath, Christian. 1992. “The Delivery and Reception of Diagnosis in the General-Practice Consultation.” In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 235–237. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John. 2010. “Questioning in Medicine”. In “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, John, and Douglas W. Maynard. 2006. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38.
. Forthcoming. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan Peter de Ruiter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23: 1–29.
Jefferson, Gail. 1989. “Notes on a Possible Metric which Provides for a ‘Standard Maximum Silence’ of One Second in Convrsation.” In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Approach, ed. by Derek Roger, and Peter Bull, 166–196. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Kanaan, Richard A., David Armstrong, and Simon C. Wessely. 2009. “Limits to Truth-Telling: Neurologists’ Communication in Conversion Disorder.” Patient Education & Counselling 77: 296–301.
Marchant-Haycox, Susan, and Peter Salmon. 1997. “Patients and Doctors’ Strategies in Consultations with Unexplained Symptoms. Interactions of Gynaecologists with Women Presenting Menstrual Problems.” Psychosomatics 38: 440–450.
Maynard, Douglas W. 1989 “Perspective-Display Sequences in Conversation.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 91–113.
. 1992. “On Clinicians Co-Implicating Recipients’ Perspective in the Delivery of Diagnostic News.” In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 331–358. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Monzoni, Chiara M., Roderick D. Duncan, Richard Grünewald, and Markus Reuber. 2011a. “Why it is So Hard to Tell Patients that They Have a Medically Unexplained Problem: A Conversation Analytic Study in Neurology Outpatients.” Patient Education & Counseling 85: 189–200.
. 2011b. “How Neurologists Talk about Medically Unexplained Symptoms: A Conversation Analytic Study.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 71 (6): 377–383.
Moore, John. this volume. “Assessments, Interrogatives, and Semi-Scripted Talk in Managing a Restriction on Advising.” In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction (Pragmatics and Beyond Series), ed. by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, and John Moore. John Benjamins.
Peräkylä, Annsi. 1998. “Authority and Accountability: The Delivery of Diagnosis in Primary Health-Care”. Social Psychology Quarterly 61: 301–320.
. 2006. “Communicating and Responding to Diagnosis.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John
Heritage, and Douglas W. Maynard, 214–247. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Plug, Leendert, Basil Sharrack, and Markus Reuber. 2010. “Seizure, Fit or Attack? The Use of Diagnostic Labels by Patients with Epileptic or Non-Epileptic seizures.” Applied Linguistics 31: 94–114.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. “Telling My Side: Limited Access as a “Fishing” Device.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3/4): 186–198.
. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred-Dispreferred Discourse.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 54–69. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (1): 161–216.
Silverman, David. 1997. Discourses of Counselling: HIV Counselling as Social Interaction.
London: Sage.
Silverman, David, and Annsi Peräkyla. 1990. “AIDS Counselling: The Interactional Organisation of Talk about ‘Delicate’ Issues.” Sociology of Health & Illness 3: 293–318.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “A Scalar View of Response Relevance.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 43 (1): 49–56.
Stone, Jon, Karen Campbell, Neelom Sharma, Alan Carson, Charles P. Warlow, and Michael Sharpe. 2003. “What Should We Call Pseudoseizures? The Patient’s Perspective.” Seizure 12: 568–572.
Teas-Gill, Virginia, and Douglas W. Maynard. 1995. “On ‘Labelling’ in Actual Interaction: Delivering and Receiving Diagnoses of Developmental Disabilities.” Social Problems 42 (1): 11–37.
Webb, Helena. this volume. “I’ll Suggest That to your Doctor”: Managing Interactional Restrictions to Treatment Provision in Secondary Care Obesity Consultations. In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction (Pragmatics and Beyond Series), ed. by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, and John Moore.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Weijts, Wies, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, and Patricia Mullen. 1993. “Talking Delicacy: Speaking about Sexuality during Gynaecological Consultations.” Sociology of Health & Illness 15: 295–314.
Werner, Anne, and Kirsti Malterud. 2003. “It is Hard Work Behaving as a Credible Patient: Encounters between Women with Chronic Pain and their Doctors.” Social Science & Medicine 57: 1409–1419.
Zanini, Claudia, and Esther González-Martínez. this volume. Talking to/through the Baby to Produce and Manage Disaffiliation during Well-Child Visits. In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction (Pragmatics and Beyond Series), ed. by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, and John Moore. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Virginia Teas Gill
van Lent, Liza G. G., Mirte van der Ham, Maja J. A. de Jonge, Eelke H. Gort, Marjolein van Mil, Jeroen Hasselaar, Carin C. D. van der Rijt, Jelle van Gurp & Julia C. M. van Weert
Orthaber, Sara
Bekhuis, Ella, Janna Gol, Christopher Burton & Judith Rosmalen
Monzoni, Chiara M., Roderick Duncan, Richard Grünewald & Markus Reuber
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.