In:Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and withholding in institutional interaction
Edited by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier and John Moore
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 255] 2015
► pp. 151–179
“But whose side are you on?”
Doing being independent in telephone-mediated dispute resolution
Published online: 27 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.255.05wea
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.255.05wea
Affiliation is a relevant response to ordinary troubles talk but in complaint calls to an independent dispute resolution service it is a restricted activity. This research asks about the practices conciliator call-takers use to maintain a neutral stance towards callers’ problems. Observable responsive practices that avoid stance alignment include okay and so prefaced turns that receipt and propose closure on the prior sequence and launch an institutionally relevant activity. It was also found that the required description of the service as independent was occasioned by callers’ pursuit of affiliation. This chapter contributes to an understanding of how, in institutional talk, restricted activities can influence and shape the trajectory of interactions.
References (22)
Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 1992. “Displaying Neutrality: Formal Aspects of Informal Court Proceedings.” In Talk at work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 199–211. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Beach, Wayne. 1993. “Transitional Regularities for ‘Casual’ “Okay” Usages.” Journal of Pragmatics 19: 325–352.
Bolden, Galina B. 2006. “Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers “So” and “Oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56: 661–688.
Clayman, Steve. 1988. “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems 35: 474–491.
. 1992. “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News-Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2009. “Emotional Reciprocity in Storytelling: How Much is Enough”
Paper presented at 11th International Pragmatics Conference
, Melbourne, 12–17 July.
Dewar, James. 2011. Calling to Complain: An Ethnographic and Conversation Analytic Account of Complaints to an Industry Ombudsman. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt. 1998. “Figures of Speech: Figurative Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation.” Language in Society 27: 495–523.
Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker. 2009. “
Going to Far: Complaining, Escalating and Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2400–2414.
Edwards, Derek. 2005. “Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints.” Discourse Studies 7 (1): 5–29.
Gaines, Philip. 2011. “The Multi Functionality of Discourse Operator Okay: Evidence from a Police Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3291–3351.
Garcia, Angela. 1991. “Dispute Resolution Without Disputing: How the Interactional Organisation of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument.” American Sociological Review 56: 818–835.
Gardiner, Rod. 1997. “The Conversational Object Mm: A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 30: 131–156.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by J.P. de Ruiter, 179–193. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Holt, Elizabeth. 2010. “The Last Laugh: Shared Laughter and Topic Termination.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1513–1525.
Jefferson, Gail. 1988. “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 45: 418–441.
Jefferson, Gail, and John Lee. 1981. “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422.
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-alone ‘So’ in Sequences of Talk-In- Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 185–218.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2003. “An Interactional Structure of Medical Activities during Acute Visits and its Implications for Patient Participation.” Health Communication 15 (1): 27–59.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Benwell, Bethan, Maria Erofeeva & Catrin S. Rhys
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.