Cover not available

In:Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and withholding in institutional interaction
Edited by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier and John Moore
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 255] 2015
► pp. 115–149

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Withholding explicit assessments in tourist-office talk

 | University of Nottingham, UK
Published online: 27 March 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.255.04che
This chapter examines the withholding of explicit assessments by tourist officers in response to enquiries that make such assessments relevant in tourist-office talk. Although there is no formal policy in place banning the production of assessments, tourist officers construct making explicit assessments in this sequential environment as a restricted activity. Drawing upon a large corpus of telephone calls in French, analysis shows that explicit personal assessments are withheld in favour of references to institutionalised value systems and recognisable normalised categories and descriptors such as star ranking, price range. These references provide clues for the callers to interpret and enable tourist officers to accomplish implicit evaluative work, whilst avoiding being heard as having made overt recommendations. Through such a practice, tourist officers manage issues of professional accountability and responsibility, constitute their professional identity as intermediaries between the public and the local business community and construct the principle of impartiality that characterises the tourist office.
References (56)
Antaki, Charles, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, and Mark Rapley. 2000. “Brilliant. Next Questions…: High-grade Assessment Sequences in the Completion of Interactional Units.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 33: 235–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Arminen, Ikka. 2005. Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Arris, Steven. 2009. “Asymmetrical Knowledge in Claims in General Practice Consultations with Frequently Attending Patients: Limitations and Opportunities for Patient Participation.” Social Science & Medicine 69: 908–919. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Butler, Carly W., Susan Danby, Michael Emmison, and Karen Thorpe. 2009. “Managing Medical Advice Seeking in Calls to Child Health Line”. Sociology of Health & Illness 31 (6): 817–834 [Special Issue on ‘Communication in Healthcare Settings: Policy, Participation and New Technologies’, ed. by Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, and Virginia Teas Gill]. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Chevalier, Fabienne H.G. 2011a. “On the Emergent and Interactive Character of Grammatical Resources in Interaction: A Single-Case Analysis of a Left Dislocation in Spoken French.” French Language and Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics, Special Issue of Nottingham French Studies 50 (2): 77–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 2011b. “Managing Impartiality in French Tourist Offices: Responses to Recommendation-Seeking Questions.” Discourse Studies 13 (2): 1–22. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Clark, Colin, Paul Drew, and Trevor Pinch. 2003. “Managing Prospect Affiliation and Rapport in Real Life Sales Encounters.” Discourse Studies 5: 5–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Clayman, Steve. 1998. “Gatekeeping in Action: Editorial Conferences and Assessments of Newsworthiness.” American Sociological Review 63: 178–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 41: 129–153. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Drew, Paul. 1984. “Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences”. In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 129–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Drew, Paul, and John Heritage (eds). 1992. Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Edwards, Derek. 2008. “Some Functions of Subject-Side and Object-Side Assessments in Conversation”. Unpublished Paper Presented at the Conference Language, Culture & Mind III , Odense, Denmark.


Fasulo, Allessandra, and Chiara Monzoni. 2009. “Assessing Mutable Objects.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 42 (2): 362–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” Pragmatics 1: 1–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 1992. “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro 
Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 147–189. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Heritage, John. 1997. ‘Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analysing Data.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, ed. by David Silverman, 161–182. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 1998. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27: 291–334. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 2002. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method for Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbra A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 196–224. Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 2005. “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch, and Richard. E. Sanders, 103–147. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by J.P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23: 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Jones, Charlotte. 2001. “Missing Assessments: Lay and Professional Orientations in Medical Interactions.” Text 21 (1/2): 113–150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Lindström, Anna, and Lorenza Mondada (eds). 2009a. Assessments in Social Interaction. Special Issue of Research on Language & Social Interaction.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 2009b. “Assessments in Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 42 (2): 299–308. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Lindström, Anna, and Trine Heinemann. 2009. “Good Enough: Low-Grade Assessments in Caregiving Situations.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 42 (2): 309–328. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


MacBeth, Douglas. 2003. “Hugh Mehan’s Learning Lessons Reconsidered: On the Difference between the Naturalistic and Critical Analysis of Classroom Discourse.” American Educational Research Journal 40: 239–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Maynard, Douglas. 1991. “Interaction and Asymmetry in Clinical Discourse.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (2): 448–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, NY: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “The Embodied and Negotiated Production of Assessments in Instructed Actions.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 42 (2): 329–361. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Mondada, Lorenza, and Veronique Traverso. 2005. “(Dés)Alignements en Clôture : Une Étude Interactionnelle de Corpus de Français Parlé en Interaction.” In Lidil: No Spécial Corpus Oraux et Diversité des Approches, ed. by Marie Savelli, 31: 34–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2001. Dislocation à Gauche et Organisation Interactionnelle. Marges Linguistiques 2: 177–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Elwys De Stefani, and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher. 2011. “The Grammar of Closings: The Use of Dislocated Constructions as Closing Initiators in French Talk-in-Interaction.” In French Language and Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, Special Issue of Nottingham French Studies 50 (2): 51–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2003. “Doing ‘Okay’. On the Multiple Metrics of an Assessment.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 36: 285–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Pilnick, Alison. 1998. “Why Didn’t You Just Say That?: Dealing with Issues of Asymmetry, Knowledge and Competence in the Pharmacists/Caller Encounter.” Sociology of Health & Illness 20 (1): 29–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Pilnick, Alison, John Hindmarsh, and Virginia Teas Gill (eds). 2009. “Communication in Healthcare Settings: Policy, Participation and New Technologies.” Special Issue of Sociology of Health & Illness 31 (6): 787–940.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Pomerantz, Anita. 1984a. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessment: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 1984b. “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Type Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


. 2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone ‘So’ in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 185–218. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35: 677–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Robinson, Jeffrey. 2001. “Asymmetry in Action: Sequential Resources in the Negotiation of a Prescription Request.” Text 21 (1/1): 19–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Sacks, Harvey. 1987 [1973]. “On the Preferences for Agreement an Contiguity.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Sarangi, Srikant, and Angus Clarke. 2002. “Zones of Expertise and the Management of Uncertainty in Genetics Risk Communication.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 35 (2): 139–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1986. “The Routine as Achievement.” Human Studies 9: 111–151. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1990. “On the Organization of Sequences as a Source of ‘Coherence’ in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. by Bruce Dorval, 51–77. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. “Repair After Next Yurn: The Last Structurally Provided for Place for the Defence of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (5): 1295–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gene Lerner. 2009. “Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to Wh-Questions.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 42: 91–115. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica VIII 4: 289–327.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organisation of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Silverman, David. 1987. Communication and Medical Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Stivers, Tanya, and John Heritage. 2001. “Breaking the Sequential Mold: Answering More than the Question during Comprehensive History Taking.” Text 21: 151–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Wiggins, Sally, and Jonathan Potter. 2003. “Attitudes and Evaluatory Practices: Category vs. Item and Subjective vs. Objective Constructions in Everyday Food Assessments.” British Journal of Social Psychology 42: 513–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar


Zimmerman, Don. H. 1992. “The Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency Assistance.” In Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Monzoni, Chiara M. & Markus Reuber
2015. Linguistic and interactional restrictions in an outpatient clinic. In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 255], ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue