Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence: Theories and applications
Edited by Helmut Gruber and Gisela Redeker
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 254] 2014
► pp. 53–83

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Contrastive relations, evaluation, and generic structure in science news

Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.254.03hau
Assuming a close relation between generic structure and coherence structure, this paper attempts to classify the meanings linked by contrastive relations in the genre of science news. The analysis reveals five typical configurations recurrent in the genre which are characterized predominantly by linguistic evaluation and the entities or situations evaluated. The units observed are discussed from three different perspectives: first, from a narrowly semantic point of view; second, with regard to their strategic role in fulfilling the texts’ genre-specific purpose; and finally, with regard to their role in the evaluative coherence in the texts, using both a focus-based and a relational approach to coherence.
References (54)
Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara, and Yvette Yannick Mathieu. 2009. “Appraisal of Opinion Expressions in Discourse.” Linguisticae Investigationes 32 (2): 279–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Nicolas, and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Polyphony in Appraisal: Typological and Topological Perspectives.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3 (2): 107–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, Jonah, and Katherine L. Milkman. 2010. Social Transmission, Emotion, and the Virality of Online Content. Accessed January 11, 2012. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Budsaba Kanoksilaptham. 2007. “Introduction to Move Analysis.” In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure, ed. by Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton, 23–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina. 2004. “The Discourse Function of Contrastive Connectors in Academic Abstracts.” In Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Anna-Brita Stenström, 139–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1986. “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.” Written Communication 3 (3): 275–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Preserving the Figure: Consistency in the Presentation of Scientific Arguments.” Written Communication 21 (1): 6–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 2000. “The Treatment of Contrasts in Interaction.” In Cause–Condition–Concession–Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 283–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut, and Peter Muntigl. 2005. “Generic and Rhetorical Structures of Texts: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” Folia Linguistica 39 (1/2): 75–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haupt, Jaromír. 2010. “Palpated, Phonendoscoped, X-rayed and Tomographed: The Structure of Science News in Good Shape.” In Interpretation of Meaning across Discourses, ed. by Renata Jančaříková, 161–174. Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Generic and Evaluative Patterns in Science News.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Masaryk University.
Heuboeck, Alois. 2009. “Some Aspects of Coherence, Genre, and Rhetorical Structure – And Their Integration in a Generic Model of Text.” Language Studies Working Papers (1): 35–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez, and Peter R. R. White. 1994. Media Literacy. Sydney, Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordan, Michael P. 1985. Rhetoric of Everyday English Texts. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. “Some Relations of Surprise and Expectation.” In The 11th LACUS Forum 1984, ed. by Robert A. Hall Jr., 263–273. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2007. “Rhetorical Moves in Biochemistry Research Articles.” In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure, ed. by Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton, 73–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Absolute Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. 1971. “If’s, And’s, But’s about Conjunction.” In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. by Charles J. Fillmore, and D. Terence Langendoen, 114–149. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8 (3): 243–281.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motta-Roth, Désirée, and Cristina dos Santos Lovato. 2009. “Organização retórica do gênero notícia de popularização da ciencia: um estudo comparativo entre português e inglês [The rhetorical organization of the genre of popular-scientific reports: A comparative study of Portuguese and English].” Linguagem em (Dis)Curso 9 (2): 233–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: The Social Construction of Popular Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries.” Discourse Studies 5 (2): 265–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin N. 1991. “The Structure of Science Popularizations: A Genre-analysis Approach to the Schema of Popularized Medical Texts.” English for Specific Purposes 10: 111–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran. 2009. “Implicit Dialogical Premises, Explanation as Argument: A Corpus-based Reconstruction.” Informal Logic 29 (1): 15–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, Anelise S. 2010. “Explicit Intertextuality in Science Popularization News.” Revista Ao pé da Letra 12 (2): 25–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spenader, Jennifer, and Gert Stulp. 2007. “Antonymy and Contrast Relations.” In Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics , Tilburg, 10–11 January.
Suhardja, Imelda. 2008. “Discourse of ‘Distortion’ and Health and Medical News Reports: A Genre Analysis Perspective.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Edinburgh.
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite, and William C. Mann. 2006. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite. 2009. “Implicit and Explicit Coherence Relations.” In Discourse, of Course, ed. by Jan Renkema, 127–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite, Kimberly Voll, and Julian Brooke. 2008. “Extracting Sentiment as a Function of Discourse Structure and Topicality.” School of Computing Science Technical Report 2008-20 .
Thetela, Puleng. 1997. “Evaluated Entities and Parameters of Value in Academic Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 101–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston. 2000. “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 1998. “Resonance in Text.” In Linguistic Choice across Genres: Variation in Spoken and Written English, ed. by Antonia Sanchez-Macarro, and Ronald Carter, 29–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Jianglin Zhou. 2000. “Evaluation and Organization in Text: The Structuring Role of Evaluative Disjuncts.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 122–141. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urbanová, Zuzana. 2013. “The Hard News Report: The Beginning, Middle and End.” In Silesian Studies 2012: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of English and American Studies, ed. by Markéta Johnová, and Michaela Weiss, 137–154. Opava: Silesian University in Opava.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 1997. “Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass-Media Hard News Reporting.” In Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by Francis Christie, and James R. Martin, 101–133. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Media Objectivity and the Rhetoric of News Story Structure.” In Discourse and Community. Doing Functional Linguistics Language in Performance 21, ed. by Eija Ventola, 379–397. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Eugene O. 1974. “Replacement as a Function of Repetition: A Study of Some of Its Principal Features in the Clause Relations of Contemporary English.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Xiao, Hao-Zhang, Chen-Yu Dai & Li-Zheng Dong
2021. The development of interlanguage pragmatic markers in alignment with role relationships. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:4 ► pp. 617 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. The Discourse of Online Sportscasting [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 297], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue