Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence: Theories and applications
Edited by Helmut Gruber and Gisela Redeker
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 254] 2014
► pp. 1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Introduction

The pragmatics of discourse coherence

 | University of Groningen
ORCiD logo with link | University of Vienna
Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.254.01red
References (80)
Afantenos, Stergos, Nicholas Asher, Farah Benamara, Myriam Bras, Cécile Fabre, Mai Ho-Dac, Anne Le Draoulec, Philippe Muller, Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley, Laurent Prévot, Josette Rebeyrolle, Ludovic Tanguy, Marianne Vergez-Couret, and Laure Vieu. 2012. “An Empirical Resource for Discovering Cognitive Principles of Discourse Organization: The ANNODIS Corpus.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12) , 2727–2734.
Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, John A. 2008. Multimodality and Genre. A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, John A., and Klaas Jan Rondhuis. 1997. “Coherence Relations: Towards a General Specification.” Discourse Processes 24: 3–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, John A., and Karl-Heinrich Schmidt. 2011. Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton. 2007. Discourse on the Move. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934/1982. Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Lynn, and Daniel Marcu. 2001. “Discourse Tagging Reference Manual.” Available at: [URL]
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Bernd Kortmann (eds). 2000. Cause–Condition–Concession–Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Topics in English Linguistics 33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crothers, Edward J. 1979. Paragraph Structure Inference. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds). 2011. “Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization and/or (Inter)Subjectification: Methodological Issues for the Study of Discourse Markers.” Thematic Issue . Linguistics 49 (2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egg, Markus, and Gisela Redeker. 2010. “How Complex is Discourse Structure?” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010) , Valletta, Malta, 1619–1623.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1974. “Pragmatics and the Description of Discourse.” In Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 1, ed. by Charles J. Fillmore, George Lakoff, and Robin Lakoff, 1–21. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Studies in Pragmatics 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles. Studies in Pragmatics 1, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis. 1996. “A Model of Sequential Relations in Expository Text.” Text 16 (4): 501–533.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabski, Michael, and Manfred Stede. 2006. “Bei: Intraclausal Coherence Relations Illustrated with a German Preposition.” Discourse Processes 41 (2): 195–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “The Logic of Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimes, Joseph E. 1975. The Thread of Discourse. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. “Attention, Intention and the Structure of Discourse.” Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut, and Birgit Huemer. 2008. “Two Views on Text Structure: Using Rhetorical Structure Theory and Register and Genre Theory in Improving Students’ Academic Writing.” Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 29: 332–365.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut, and Peter Muntigl. 2005. “Generic and Rhetorical Structures of Texts: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” Folia Linguistica 39 (1–2): 75–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. London: Hodder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R. 1979. “Coherence and Coreference.” Cognitive Science 3: 67–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Literature and Cognition. CSLI Lecture Notes Nr. 21. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Abduction in Natural Language Understanding.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Larry Horn, and Gregory Ward, 724–741. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R., Mark E. Stickel, Douglas E. Appelt, and Paul Martin. 1993. “Interpretation as Abduction.” Artificial Intelligence 63: 69–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho-Dac, Lydia-Mai, Cécile Fabre, Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley, Josette Rebeyrolle, and Ludovic Tanguy. 2012. “An Empirical Approach to the Signalling of Enumerative Structures.” Discours 10. [URL]. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho-Dac, Lydia-Mai, and Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley. 2009. “A Data-driven Study of Temporal Adverbials as Discourse Segmentation Markers.” Discours 4. [URL]; Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960/1978. “Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, 7th printing, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knott, Alistair, and Ted Sanders. 1998. “The Classification of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers: An Exploration of Two Languages.” Journal of Pragmatics 30 (2): 135–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R., and Theo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longacre, Ronald E. 1976. An Anatomy of Speech Notions. Ghent, Belgium: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. “Relational Propositions in Discourse.” Discourse Processes 9: 57–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Technical Report No. ISI/RS-87-190. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8: 243–281.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcu, Daniel. 2000. “The Rhetorical Parsing of Unrestricted Texts: A Surface-based Approach.” Computational Linguistics 26 (3): 395–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose. 2007. Working with Discourse. Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Bonnie J. F. 1975. “Identification of the Structure of Prose and Its Implications for the Study of Reading and Memory.” Journal of Reading Behavior VII (1): 7–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Johanna D., and Martha E. Pollack. 1992. “A Problem for RST: The Need for Multi-level Discourse Analysis.” Computational Linguistics 18: 537–544.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polanyi, Livia. 1988. “A Formal Model of the Structure of Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 601–638. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prasad, Rashmi, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Eleni Miltsakaki, Livio Robaldo, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber. 2008. “The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08) , Morocco.
Redder, Angelika. 2008. “Functional Pragmatics.” In Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Gerd Antos, and Eija Ventola, 133–178. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela. 1990. “Ideational and Pragmatic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. “Linguistic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Linguistics 29: 1139–1172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Coherence and Structure in Text and Discourse.” In Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics, ed. by Harry Bunt, and William Black, 233–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Discourse Markers as Attentional Cues at Discourse Transitions.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles. Studies in Pragmatics 1, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 339–358. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela, Ildikó Berzlánovich, Nynke van der Vliet, Gosse Bouma, and Markus Egg. 2012. “Multi-layer Discourse Annotation of a Dutch Text Corpus.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12) , 2820–2825.
. 2009. The Texture of Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren, and Leo Noordman. 1992. “Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations.” Discourse Processes 15 (1): 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “Coherence Relations in a Cognitive Theory of Discourse Representation.” Cognitive Linguistics 4 (2): 93–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, and Ninke Stukker (eds). 2012. “Causal Connectives in Discourse: A Cross- linguistic Perspective.” Special Issue . Journal of Pragmatics 44 (2): 131–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stede, Manfred. 2012. Discourse Processing. Synthesis Lecture on Human Language Technologies #15. Morgan and Claypool.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite. 2006. “Discourse Markers as Signals (or Not) of Rhetorical Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (4): 567–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Implicit and Explicit Coherence Relations.” In Discourse, of Course. An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies, ed. by Jan Renkema, 127–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite, and Christopher Habel. 2013. “Rhetorical Relations in Multimodal Documents.” Discourse Studies 15 (1): 65–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite, and William C. Mann. 2006a. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. “Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory.” Discourse Studies 8 (4): 567–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, Joseph. 2013a. “Prosodic Correlates of Discourse Boundaries and Hierarchy in Discourse Production.” Lingua 133: 101–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Prosody and the Interpretation of Hierarchically Ambiguous Discourse.” Discourse Processes (accepted author version posted online: 30 Dec 2013. ).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1979. “Pragmatic Connectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 3 (5): 447–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Versley, Yannick, and Anna Gastel. 2013. “Linguistic Tests for Discourse Relations in the TüBa-D/Z Corpus of Written German.” Dialogue and Discourse 4 (2): 142–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webber, Bonnie, Markus Egg, and Valia Kordoni. 2012. “Discourse Structure and Language Technology.” Natural Language Engineering 18 (4): 437–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webber, Bonnie, Matthew Stone, Aravind Joshi, and Alistair Knott. 2013. “Anaphora and Discourse Structure.” Computational Linguistics 29 (4): 545–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wildfeuer, Janina. 2013. Film Discourse Interpretation: Towards a New Paradigm for Multimodal Film Analysis. London: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Galia Hirsch
2025. What kind of laughter?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Kawase, Tomoyuki
2022. How do applied linguistics researchers structure coherence relations in the process of establishing a niche for their research?. Text & Talk 42:2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Kawase, Tomoyuki
2025. Move combinations in the conclusion section of applied linguistics research articles. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Hannß, Katja
2021. Salience and shift in salience as means of creating discourse coherence. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:4 ► pp. 533 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue