Cover not available

In:Discourses of Helping Professions:
Edited by Eva-Maria Graf, Marlene Sator and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 252] 2014
► pp. 123–155

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Form, function and particularities of discursive practices in one-on-one supervision in Germany

Published online: 18 December 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.252.06aks
One-on-one supervision in Germany is not always the counselling of a professional in the helping professions by a supervisor from a similar field. It can also be – due to its adaptation to modern work contexts – a counselling format for a professional in a managerial position, not unlike business coaching. In some cases, these two aspects converge. In this article I will – based on two excerpts from a transcript – describe how two of the ubiquitous communicative tasks in one-on-one supervision (‘establishing the need for counseling, establishing the counselor as authority’ and ‘presenting the problem’) are tackled in light of this convergence and show that supervision is a conversation between experts who create a specific supervisor-supervisee relationship.
References (46)
References
Aksu, Yasmin. in prep. Kontext, Selbstverständnis und Gesprächsrealität der Einzelsupervision. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
American Counseling Association (ACA). 2005. Code of Ethics. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Association for Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES). 2011. Best Practices in Clinical Supervision. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belardi, Nando. 2005. Supervision. Grundlagen, Techniken, Perspektiven. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boettcher, Wolfgang, and Albert Bremerich-Vos. 1988. Transkript einer Lehrsupervision. In Diagnose und Intervention in Supervisionsprozessen, ed. by Heinz J. Kersting, Lothar Krapohl, and Gerhard Leuschner, 32–43. Aachen: Kersting.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boettcher, Wolfgang. 1998. Grundlagen Schulischer Beratung. Soest (LSW).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinker, Klaus, Gerd Antos, and Wolfgang Heinemann. 2000. Text- und Gesprächslinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Linguistics of texts and conversation. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. 1. Halbband. Volume 1. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Text- und Gesprächslinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Linguistics of texts and conversation. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. 2. Halbband. Volume 2. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buer, Ferdinand. 2005.“Coaching, Supervision und die vielen anderen Formate – Ein Plädoyer für ein friedliches Zusammenspiel.” Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching 12 (3): 278–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Supervision e.V. (ed.). 2010. Implementierung von Supervision in die erste Phase der Lehrerausbildung an der Universität / Hochschule. Kassel: Kassel University Press GmbH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (ed.). 2008. Der Nutzen von Supervision. Verzeichnis von Evaluationen und wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten. Köln: Kassel University press GmbH. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage (eds). 1992. Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1993. “HIAT – a Transcription System for Discourse Data.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Decoding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane Edwards, and Martin Lampert, 123–148. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaertner, Adrian. 1999. Gruppensupervision. Theoriegeschichtliche und fallanalytische Untersuchungen. Tübingen: Edition diskord.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gebel, Sigrid, and Agnes Speck. 1991. “Untersuchung der Eröffnung von Therapiegesprächen.” In Verbale Interaktion. Studien zur Empirie und Methodologie der Pragmatik, ed. by Dieter Flader, 9–26. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giesecke, Michael, and Kornelia Rappe-Giesecke.1997. Supervision als Medium kommunikativer Sozialforschung. Die Integration von Selbsterfahrung und distanzierter Betrachtung in der Beratung und Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glas-Bastert, Ulrike. 1998. “Alles sehen – Vieles übersehen – Manches aufgreifen.” In Praxisnahe Supervisionsforschung. Felder – Designs – Ergebnisse, ed. by Peter Berker, and Ferdinand Buer, 216–236 Münster: Votum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria. in prep. The Discourse (s) of Executive Coaching. An Applied Linguistic Analysis.
Haubl, Rolf. 2008. “Coaching und Supervision: Wie paradigmatisch sind die Differenzen?” DGSv aktuell 4: 13–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hausinger, Brigitte. 2011. “Supervision.” In Beratungsexpertise für die Arbeitswelt, ed. by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Supervision e.V., 9–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kallmeyer, Werner. 2000. “Beraten und Betreuen. Zur gesprächsanalytischen Untersuchung von helfenden Interaktionen.” ZBBS 2: 227–252.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keupp, Heiner. 1997. Ermutigung zum aufrechten Gang. Tübingen: dgvt-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lalouschek, Johanna. 2008. Ärztliche Gesprächspläne und Anliegen von PatientInnen in der chronischen Schmerzbehandlung. [URL] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maier-Gutheil, Cornelia. 2009. Zwischen Beratung und Begutachtung. Pädagogische Professionalität in der Existenzgründungsberatung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meer, Dorothee. 2003. Sprechstundengespräche an der Hochschule. Ein Ratgeber für Lehrende und Studierende. Hohengehren: Schneider.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Christoph. 2002. Arbeitsbesprechungen. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menz, Florian, Johanna Lalouschek, and Andreas Gstettner. 2008. Effiziente ärztliche Gesprächsführung. Wien: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirivel, Julien, and Karen Trancy. 2005. “Premeeting Talk: An Organizationally Crucial Form of Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (1): 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Möller, Heidi. 2009. “Quo vadis Beratungswissenschaften?” In Quo vadis Beratungswissenschaften?, ed. by Heidi Möller, and Brigitte Hausinger, 7–17. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Möller, Heidi, and Brigitte Hausinger. 2009. Quo vadis Beratungswissenschaften? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Münch, Karsten. 1998. “Interne Supervision in der psychiatrischen Klinik.” Psychosozial 70: 47–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nothdurft, Werner. 1984. “Äh folgendes Problem äh”: Die interaktive Ausarbeitung “des Problems” in Beratungsgesprächen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nothdurft, Werner, Ulrich Reitemeier, and Peter Schröder (eds). 1994. Beratungsgespräche. Analyse asymmetrischer Dialoge. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oevermann, Ulrich. 1993. “Verbatim-Transkript einer Teamsupervision.” In Therapeutische Teams, ed. by Benjamin Bardé, and Dankwart Mattke, 109–140. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawelczyk, Johanna. 2011. Talk as Therapy. Psychotherapy in a Linguistic Perspective. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petzold, Hilarion G., Brigitte Schigl, Martin Fischer, and Claudia Höfner. 2003. Supervision auf dem Prüfstand. Wirksamkeit, Forschung, Anwendungsfelder, Innovation. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pühl, Harald, and Wolfgang Schmidbauer. 1986. Supervision und Psychoanalyse. Plädoyer für eine emanzipatorische Reflexion in den helfenden Berufen. München: Kösel-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pühl, Harald. 1998. Team-Supervision. Von der Subversion zur Institutionsanalyse. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher Candlin. 2011. “Professional and organizational practice: A Discourse/ Communication Perspective.” In Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. by Christopher Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 3–58. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts (eds). 1999. Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, Florian. 2013. The Psycho-Managerial Complex at Work: A Study of the Discursive Practices of Management Coaching. St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 1983. “Zur Relevanz kommunikativer Sozialforschung für die Supervision” In Beiträge zur Supervision, ed. by Norbert Lippenmeier, and Josef Sondermann, 262–389. Kassel: Gesamthochschule Kassel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, et al. 2010. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue