In:The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status
Edited by Hanna Pishwa and Rainer Schulze
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 248] 2014
► pp. 239–264
Language, normativity and power
The discursive construction of objectophilia
Published online: 12 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.10mot
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.10mot
The present paper aims to shed light on how social actors orient to sexual normativity in their talk. It relates normativity to (Foucauldian) notions of discourse and power, arguing that local linguistic negotiations of sexuality are generally shaped by a competition between dominant and marginalized discourses. The empirical section focusses on how sexual normativity is linguistically constructed in conversations related to objectophilia, a form of sexual desire that is clearly non-normative. The data consists of telephone calls from the German radio phone-in show Domian. It is shown how speakers co-construct sexual normativity in general as well as more specific forms of it such as humano-normativity and heteronormativity. It can be seen that even the construction of non-normative desires is predominantly structured by normative sexuality discourses.
References (29)
Bowerman, Sean. 2006. “Norms and Correctness.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. (
Second Edition
). Volume VIII, ed. by Edward K. Brown, 701–703. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2004. “Theorizing Identity in Language and Sexuality Research.” Language in Society 33(4): 469–515.
Bußmann, Hadumod, and Marlis Hellinger. 2003. “Engendering Female Visibility in German.” In Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume III, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bußmann, 141–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cameron, Deborah, and Don Kulick. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Jeffrey, and Betty LaFrance. 2012. “‘That’s Gay’: Sexual Prejudice, Gender Identity, Norms, and Homophobic Communication.” Communication Quarterly60(1): 35–58.
Jeffries, Lesley. 2007. Textual Construction of the Female Body: A Critical Discourse Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koller, Veronika. 2013. “Constructing (Non-) Normative Identities in Written Lesbian Discourse: A Diachronic Study.” Discourse & Society24(5): 572–589.
Love, Nigel. 1994. “Correctness and Norms.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by R.E. Asher, 773–780. Oxford: Pergamon.
Married to the Eiffel Tower. 2008. [URL] (2 January 2013).
Marsh, Amy. 2010. “Love Among the Objectum Sexuals.” Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality13(1): [URL] (5 November 2013).
Milani, Tommaso. 2013. “Are ‘Queers’ Really ‘Queer’? Language, Identity and Same-Sex Desire in a South African Online Community.” Discourse & Society24(5): 615–633.
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2009. “Speaking the Gendered Body: The Performative Construction of Commercial Femininities and Masculinities via Body-Part Vocabulary.” Language in Society38(1): 1–22.
. 2010. Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. “Taking Queer Linguistics Further: Sociolinguistics and Critical Heteronormativity Research.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language212: 149–179.
. 2014. “Focusing on Normativity in Language and Sexuality Studies: Insights from Conversations on Objectophilia.” Critical Discourse Studies11(1): 49–70.
Motschenbacher, Heiko, and Martin Stegu. 2013. “Queer Linguistic Approaches to Discourse.” Discourse & Society24(5): 519–535.
Objectum Sexuality Internationale. 2011. [URL] (2 January 2013).
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Gatzia, Dimitria Electra & Sarah Arnaud
Coimbra-Gomes, Elvis & Heiko Motschenbacher
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
