In:The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status
Edited by Hanna Pishwa and Rainer Schulze
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 248] 2014
► pp. 193–211
A true authoritarian type
How fonts can facilitate positive opinions for powerful groups
Published online: 12 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.08don
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.08don
To convey authority in a document, people choose specific typefaces (or fonts). Studies find that repeating a message makes it more persuasive, and that different typefaces lead to different associations. Also, statements are more memorable when written in harder-to-read typefaces; yet more believable for easier-to-read ones. In each of the two present experiments, surveys measuring authoritarianism were written in various typefaces. The first experiment sought evaluations of groups such as the army and police. The second experiment included subject matters like illegal wiretapping by the F.B.I. The results suggested participants had more positive views for authoritarian groups and more likely supported morally questionable actions when the surveys were written in an easy-to-read typeface.
References (17)
Altemeyer, Robert. 2006. The Authoritarians, [URL]
de Jong, Cees W., Alston W. Purvis, and Friedrich Friedl. 2005. Creative Type: A Sourcebook of Classic and Contemporary Letterforms. London: Princeton Thames and Hudson.
Diemand-Yauman, Connor, Daniel M. Oppenheimer, and Erikka B. Vaughan. 2011. “Fortune Favors the Bold and the Italicized: Effects of Disfluency on Educational Outcomes.” Cognition 118: 111–115.
Fiske, Susan T. 2004. Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Hathcoat, John D., and Laura L. B. Barnes. 2010. “Explaining the Relationship Among Fundamentalism and Authoritarianism: An Epistemic Connection.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 20: 73–84.
Lenhart, Amanda. 2012. “Teens, Smartphones, and Texting.” Pew Research Center. [URL]
McLuhan, Marshall, and Quentin Fiore. 1962. The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects. Corte Madera, CA: Ginko Press.
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. 2005. “Consequences of Erudite Vernacular Utilized Irrespective of Necessity: Problems with Using Long Words Needlessly.” Applied Cognitive Psychology20: 139–156.
Rigby, Ken. 1982. “A Concise Scale for the Assessment of Attitudes Towards Institutional Authority.” Australian Journal of Psychology34: 194–205.
Song, Hyukin, and Norbert Schwarz. 2008. “Fluency and the Detection of Misleading Questions: Low Processing Fluency Attenuates the Moses Illusion.” Social Cognition 26: 791–799.
Tsai, Claire I., and Ann L. McGill. 2011. “‘No Pain, No Gain.’ How Fluency and Construal Level Affect Consumer Confidence.” Journal of Consumer Research37: 807–821.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
