Cover not available

In:The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and implications
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez-García and Angela Downing
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 247] 2014
► pp. 149–168

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

How did we think?

 | University of Antwerp, Belgium
 | University of Antwerp, Belgium
Published online: 16 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.08jan
This paper presents a diachronic corpus investigation into the Dutch mental state predicate denken ‘think’. It investigates both the semantic development (specifically, the evolution in the non-attitudinal vs. the attitudinal meanings of the verb) and the grammatical development (the evolution in terms of the types of grammatical patterns with which the verb appears), and the correlations between the two, from Old Dutch onwards. The discussion focuses specifically on the implications for our understanding of the processes of grammaticalisation and subjectification, and their correlations: the verb shows clear signs of a process of semantic subjectification, but not of structural grammaticalisation, hence it offers evidence for the assumption that these two processes are less intimately intertwined than is often assumed in the literature.
References (28)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I think – An English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages , ed. by Toril Swan, and Olan J. Westvik, 1–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder. 2007. “Complement-taking Predicates. ” Studies in Language 31: 569–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byloo, Pieter. 2009. Modality and Negation . PhD thesis, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CD-ROM Middelnederlands . 1998. Den Haag: SDU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Katrien Deygers, Hilde van Aken, Vicky van den Heede, and Dirk ­Speelman. 2000. “Het ConDiv-corpus geschreven Nederlands.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 5: 356–363.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. “On Some Principles of Grammaticisation.” In Approaches to Grammaticalisation , Vol 1 , ed. by Elizabeth Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge ­University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar , vol. 2 . Stanford: Stanford ­University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nederlandse Taalunie. 2004. Corpus Gesproken Nederlands, Version 2.0 . Leiden: TST-Centrale INL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2010. “What Conversational English Tells Us about the Nature of Grammar.” In Language Usage and Language Structure , ed. by Kasper Boye, and Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, 3–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 1997. “How do you think?” In A Fund of Ideas , ed. by Christopher S. Butler, J. ��­Connolly, R. Gatward, and R. Vismans, 3–18. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. “Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 383–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Notions of (Inter)Subjectivity.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan, and Wietske Vonk. 1999. “Epistemic Modality and Focus in Dutch. ” Linguistics 37: 699–737.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1982. “The Symbiotic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech.” In Impromptu Speech , ed. by Nils E. Enkvist, 147–177. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Persson, Gunnar. 1993. “Think in a Panchronic Perspective.” Studia Neophilologica 65: 2–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 1998. “I think and its Dutch Equivalents in Parliamentary Debates.” In Corpora and Crosslinguistic Research , ed. by Stig Johansson, and Signe ­Oksefjell, 297–317. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “The Functions of I think in Political Discourse.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10: 41–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1995. “Some Remarks on Comment Clauses.” In The Verb in Contemporary English , ed. by Bas Aarts, and Charles F. Meyer, 290–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “‘Object complements’ and conversation. ” Studies in Language 26: 125–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac. 1991. “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammati­cisation of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalisation , Vol 2 , ed. by Elizabeth Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. “(Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalisation , ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2009. The Grammar of Complement-Taking Mental Predicate Constructions in Present-Day Spoken British English . PhD thesis, University of Ghent.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Nuyts, Jan & Karolien Janssens
2019. Parentheticals revisited: The case of Dutchdenken. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2 ► pp. 475 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue