Cover not available

In:The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and implications
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez-García and Angela Downing
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 247] 2014
► pp. 19–36

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Developing comprehensive criteria of adequacy

The challenge of hybridity

Published online: 16 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.02wra
Butler (2009a, b) argues that an adequate model of the language system should accommodate cognitive, sociocultural, discoursal, acquisitional, typological and diachronic dimensions, and observational evidence from corpora, experiments and intuition. This paper asks if such reconciliation is possible. It argues that language is composed of accreted subsystems that render the linguistic system inherently complex in each dimension. This hybridity explains the difficulty in constructing Butler’s macro-model, but also indicates how it might be done. Subsystems that add complexity in one dimension are often explained by another, e.g. sub-patterns for English plural formation arose for sociocultural reasons (Classical borrowing); typological exception groups (e.g. Director General) have a diachronic explanation. Thus, future modelling will benefit from the flexibility to cross-refer between dimensions.
References (32)
References
Antia, Bassey E. 2007a. “Introduction. LSP Studies: Factoring in Indeterminacy.” In Indeterminacy in terminology and LSP , ed. by Bassey E. Antia, xiii–xxii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (ed). 2007b. Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP . Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1976. “Meaning and memory. ” Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 2009a. “The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, Strengths and Challenges.” In Deconstructing constructions , ed. by Christopher S. Butler, and Javier Martín Arista, 117–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Criteria of Adequacy in Functional Linguistics. ” Folia Linguistica 43 (1): 1–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrier, David. 2000. The Aesthetics of Comics . University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. “Inflection Classes, Gender, and the Principle of Contrast. ” Language 70: 737–788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John McH Sinclair, and Martin Warren. 2009. “Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams. ” Applied Linguistics 30 (2): 236–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam A. 1957. Syntactic Structures . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corson, David. 1995. Using English Words . Dortrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of “Let Alone”. ” Language 64 (3): 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2003. “Social Interaction and Grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language (vol 2: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure) , ed. by Michael Tomasello, 119–144. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1980. “Pragmatics and Logical Form. ” Journal of Pragmatics 4 (1): 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grace, George W. 2002. “Collateral Damage from Linguistics? 3: The Role of Culture-centrism.” Ethnolinguistic Notes 4: 23. Available at: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1987/2003. “Language and the Order of Nature.” In The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature , ed. by Colin MacCabe, Nigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, and Alan Durant, 135–154. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Reprinted in Halliday, Michael A. K. (2003) (ed. J. Webster). On Language and Linguistics, 116–138. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick. 2013. Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 2007. The Origins of Meaning . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalmár, Ivan. 1985. “Are there really no primitive languages?” In Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing , ed. by David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance, and Angela Hildyard, 148–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in Language Evolution. ” Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 1982. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics . Linköping: University of Linköping.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, David R. 1977. “From Utterance to Text: The Bias of Language in Speech and Writing. ” Harvard Educational Review 47 (3): 257–281.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1998. Review of “From Grammar to Science: New Foundations for General Linguistics” by Victor H. Yngve. Computational Linguistics 24 (1): 173–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez-Martínez, Felipe, Forcada, Mikel L., and Andy Way. 2009. “Hybrid Rule-based – ­Example-based MT: Feeding Apertium with Sub-sentential Translation Units.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Example-Based Machine Translation, Dublin, 11–18. Available at: [URL].
Thurston, William R. 1989. “How Exoteric Languages Build a Lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain.” In VICAL 1: Oceanic Languages. Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Auckland, New Zealand, January 1988, ed. by Ray Harlow, and Robin Hooper, 555–579. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiramulesh, K. V. 1991. “Why You Can’t Repunch Bill: An Inquiry into the Pragmatics of “Re-words” in English. ” Journal of Pragmatics 16: 249–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. “The Puzzle of Language Learning: From Child’s Play to ‘Linguaphobia’. ” Language Teaching 41 (2): 255–273.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, Alison, Stephen Cox, Michael Lincoln, and Judy Tryggvason. 2004. “A Formulaic Approach to Translation at the Post Office: Reading the Signs. ” Language and Communication 24 (1): 59–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, Alison, and George W. Grace. 2007. “The Consequences of Talking to Strangers: Evolutionary Corollaries of Socio-cultural Influences on Linguistic Form.” Lingua 117 (3): 543–578 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Butler, Christopher S.
2019. Does functional linguistics have a ‘fundamental unity’?. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue