Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (25)
References
Arnold, Jennifer E., Maria Fagnano, and Michael K Tanenhaus. 2003. “Disfluencies Signal theee, um, New Information.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 (1):25–36. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E. 1998. “Reference Form and Discourse Patterns.” PhD diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie. 1994. “Le fonctionnement de parce que en français parlé contemporain. Description linguistique et implications didactiques.” Thesis, Université de Nancy II.
Declerck, Renaat. 1997. When-clauses and Temporal Structure . London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groupe Lambda-l. 1975. “Car, parce que, puisque.” Revue Romane 10 (2):248–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerr, Betsy. 1983. Minnesota Corpus. Available by request from the creator.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, Julia Bordeaux, and Robert Reichle. 2006. “Cognitive Constraints on Assertion Scope: The Case of Spoken French parce que.” In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics : Vol. I: Morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, ed. by Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil and Chiyo Nishida, 143–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Goffic, Pierre. 1993. Grammaire de la phrase française . Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk . Third Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, Janet L. 2006. “Beyond the Critical Period: Processing-based Explanations for Poor Grammaticality Judgment Performance by Late Second Language Learners.” Journal of Memory and Language 55: 381–401. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millis, Keith K., and Marcel A. Just. 1994. “The Influence of Connectives on Sentence Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1):128–147. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millis, Keith K., Jonathan M. Golding, and Gregory Barker. 1995. “Causal Connectives Increase Inference Generation.” Discourse Processes 20: 29–49. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques. 1986. “Connecteurs pragmatiques, lois de discours et stratégies interprétatives : parce que et la justification interprétative.” Cahiers de Linguistique 7: 149–167. Université de Genève.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mouchon, S., Ehrlich, M. -F., & Loridant, C. (1999). “Effets immédiats ou différés du connecteur « parce que » dans la compréhension de phrases ? Réexamen du modèle de Millis et Just (1994). L’année Psychologique , 99(2), 239–269. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myles, Florence. 2007. “Using Electronic Corpora in SLA Research.” In French Applied Linguistics , ed. by Dalila Ayoun, 377–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myles, Florence and Rosamond Mitchell. 2013. French Learner Language Oral Corpora. Retrieved from [URL]
Reali, Florencia, and Morten H. Christiansen. 2007. “Processing of Relative Clauses is Made Easier by Frequency of Occurrence.” Journal of Memory and Language 57 (1):1–23. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichle, Robert V. (forthcoming). “Cleft Type and Focus Structure Processing in French.” Language and Cognitive Processes . Early-access version available online: .
Reichle, Robert V., Annie Tremblay, and Caitlin Coughlin. (under review). “Working Memory Capacity in L2 processing.”
Reichle, Robert V., Annie Tremblay, and Caitlin Coughlin. (2013). “Working-memory Capacity Effects in the Processing of Non-adjacent Subject-verb Agreement: An Event-related Brain Potentials Study.” Selected Proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum .Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roland, Douglas, Frederic Dick, and Jeffrey L. Elman. 2007. “Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A corpus analysis.” Journal of Memory and Language 57 (3):348–379. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Robert Léon, and Jacqueline Pinchon. 1962. Grammaire du français classique et moderne . 2nd ed. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, Justine B., Morten H. Christiansen, David S. Race, Daniel J. Acheson, and Maryellen C. MacDonald. 2009. “Experience and Sentence Processing: Statistical Learning and Relative Clause Comprehension.” Cognitive Psychology 58 (2):250–71. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilmet, Marc. 1998. Grammaire critique du français . 2nd edition. Paris/Bruxelles: Duculot, Hachette Supérieur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue