In:Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht
Edited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. 183–198
Processing constraints and information structure as moderating factors on first- and second-language use of the causal conjunction parce que
Published online: 5 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.09rei
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.09rei
Causal conjunctions have been studied by linguists (e.g. Groupe Lambda-l 1975; Debaisieux 1994; Lambrecht, Bordeaux, and Reichle 2006) and by psycholinguists and cognitive psychologists interested in language processing (e.g. Millis and Just 1994; Millis, Golding, and Barker 1995). These approaches result in different descriptions of the French word parce que ‘because.’ It is predicted to be unmarked in its information structure, but marked in its processing due to the increased load it places on processing resources and working memory. This chapter compares these two possible moderating factors on the use of parce que by analyzing corpus data from native speakers and second language learners of French, and argues that the information structure of the conjunction plays a greater role than its processability in determining its use in spoken French.
References (25)
Arnold, Jennifer E., Maria Fagnano, and Michael K Tanenhaus. 2003. “Disfluencies Signal theee, um, New Information.”
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
32 (1):25–36. .
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie. 1994. “Le fonctionnement de parce que en français parlé contemporain. Description linguistique et implications didactiques.” Thesis, Université de Nancy II.
Kerr, Betsy. 1983. Minnesota Corpus. Available by request from the creator.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994.
Information Structure and Sentence form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
Lambrecht, Knud, Julia Bordeaux, and Robert Reichle. 2006. “Cognitive Constraints on Assertion Scope: The Case of Spoken French parce que.” In
New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics
: Vol. I: Morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, ed. by Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil and Chiyo Nishida, 143–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000.
The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk
. Third Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McDonald, Janet L. 2006. “Beyond the Critical Period: Processing-based Explanations for Poor Grammaticality Judgment Performance by Late Second Language Learners.”
Journal of Memory and Language
55: 381–401. .
Millis, Keith K., and Marcel A. Just. 1994. “The Influence of Connectives on Sentence Comprehension.”
Journal of Memory and Language
33 (1):128–147. .
Millis, Keith K., Jonathan M. Golding, and Gregory Barker. 1995. “Causal Connectives Increase Inference Generation.”
Discourse Processes
20: 29–49. .
Moeschler, Jacques. 1986. “Connecteurs pragmatiques, lois de discours et stratégies interprétatives : parce que et la justification interprétative.”
Cahiers de Linguistique
7: 149–167. Université de Genève.
Mouchon, S., Ehrlich, M. -F., & Loridant, C. (1999). “Effets immédiats ou différés du connecteur « parce que » dans la compréhension de phrases ? Réexamen du modèle de Millis et Just (1994).
L’année Psychologique
, 99(2), 239–269. .
Myles, Florence. 2007. “Using Electronic Corpora in SLA Research.” In
French Applied Linguistics
, ed. by Dalila Ayoun, 377–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Myles, Florence and Rosamond Mitchell. 2013. French Learner Language Oral Corpora. Retrieved from [URL]
Reali, Florencia, and Morten H. Christiansen. 2007. “Processing of Relative Clauses is Made Easier by Frequency of Occurrence.”
Journal of Memory and Language
57 (1):1–23. .
Reichle, Robert V. (forthcoming). “Cleft Type and Focus Structure Processing in French.”
Language and Cognitive Processes
. Early-access version available online: .
Reichle, Robert V., Annie Tremblay, and Caitlin Coughlin. (under review). “Working Memory Capacity in L2 processing.”
Reichle, Robert V., Annie Tremblay, and Caitlin Coughlin. (2013). “Working-memory Capacity Effects in the Processing of Non-adjacent Subject-verb Agreement: An Event-related Brain Potentials Study.”
Selected Proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum
.Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Roland, Douglas, Frederic Dick, and Jeffrey L. Elman. 2007. “Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A corpus analysis.”
Journal of Memory and Language
57 (3):348–379. .
Wagner, Robert Léon, and Jacqueline Pinchon. 1962.
Grammaire du français classique et moderne
. 2nd ed. Paris: Hachette.
