Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht
Edited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. 157–182

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Pourquoi in Spoken French

Corpus-based function-form mapping

Published online: 5 March 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.08mye
WH-Interrogatives in spoken French are exceptional due both to the diversity of syntactic forms available to express the same propositional content (Coveney 1996) as well as the parameters that influence their use. The causal interrogative adverb pourquoi ‘why’ has a notably deficient paradigm (Korzen 1985), as is seen in its incompatibility with stylistic inversion and in situ structures. In this chapter, all instantiations of pourquoi in a corpus of casual conversations, whether interrogative or not, are first categorized according to discourse function(s) and then mapped to structures. This usage-driven, discourse approach successfully narrows the number of observed forms per function and also further distinguishes them by integrating discourse markers and negation.
References (35)
References
Ashby, William J. 1977. “Interrogative Forms in Parisian French.” Semasia 4: 35–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behnstedt, Peter. 1973. Viens-tu? Est-ce que tu viens? Tu viens? Formen und Strukturen des direkten Fragesatzes im Französischen . Tübingen: Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilger, Mireille. 1989. “Les réalisations en et tout ça à l’oral.” Recherches sur le français parlé 9: 97–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blinkenberg, Andreas. 1928. L’ordre des mots en français moderne . Copenhague.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 1999. “Decomposing French Questions.” In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6.1, ed. by J. Alexander, N.R. Han and M. Minnick Fox, 69–80, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 1996. Reprint 2001. Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation . Bristol: Elm Bank.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “The Use of the QU-final Interrogative Structure in Spoken French.” French Language Studies 5: 143–171. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 1999. “Word Order Variation in French Interrogative Structures.” ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics 125/126: 161–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Cynthia A. 1989. “Syntactic Variation and Interrogative Structures in Quebecois.” PhD diss., Indiana University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise. 1989. Le français ordinaire . Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffmann, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gülich, Elisabeth. 1999. “Les activités de structuration dans l’interaction verbale.” In Le français parlé. Variétés et discours , ed. by J.-M. Barbéris, 21–47. Montpellier: Praxiling Université Paul Valéry. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2001. “The Case for an Eclectic Approach to Discourse-in-interaction.” In New Adventures in Language and Interaction, ed. by Jürgen Streeck, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. “L’acte de question et l’acte d’assertion: opposition discrète ou continuum?” In La question, ed. by Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 87–111. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerr, Betsy. 1983. Minnesota Corpus. Available by request from the creator.
Korzen, Hanne. 1985. Pourquoi et l’inversion finale en français : étude sur le statut de l’adverbial de cause et l’anatomie de la construction tripartite . Etudes Romanes de l’Université de Copenhague, Revue Romane numéro supplémentaire 30. Munksgaard: Copenhague.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form . Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. “On the Status of SVO Sentences in French discourse.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 217–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, Julia Bordeaux, and Robert Reichle. 2006. “Cognitive Constraints on Assertion Scope: The Case of Spoken French parce que.” In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Vol. I: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics, ed. by Jean-Pierre Montreuil and Chiyo Nishida, 143–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, and Laura Michaelis. 1998. “Sentence Accent in Information Questions: Default and Projection.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (5):477–544. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 1998. “Rotse lishmoa keta? ‘Wanna hear something weird/funny [lit. ‘a segment’]?’: The Discourse Markers Segmenting Israeli Hebrew Talk-in-interaction.” In Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv, 13–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Lindsy L. 2007. “WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: a Corpus-Based Analysis of their Form and Function.” PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 2005. “And stuff und so: Investigating Pragmatic Expressions in English and German.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1845–1864. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pellet, Stéphanie. 2009. “The Pragmatics of the French Discourse Markers donc and alors.” In Little Words: Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, and Acquisition, ed. by Ronald P. Leow, Héctor Campos, and Donna Lardiere, 159–170. Proceedings of the Georgetown University Round Table of Languages and Linguistics (GURT). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pohl, Jacques. 1965. “Observations sur les formes d’interrogation dans la langue parlée et dans la langue écrite non-littéraire.” Xe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes vol . 2. Paris: Klincksieck. 501–513.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quillard, Virginie. 2000. Interroger en français parlé: études syntaxique, pragmatique et sociolinguistique . Thèse de doctorat. Université de Tours, France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renchon, Hector. 1967. Études de syntaxe descriptive . Bruxelles: Palais des Académies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53: 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terry, Robert M. 1970. Contemporary French Interrogative Structures . Quebec: Editions Cosmos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2009. “Why Questions, Presuppositions and Intervention Effects.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18: 253–271. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valdman, Albert. 1967. “Norme pédagogique: les structures interrogatives du français.” IRAL 5: 3–10. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Thiberge, Gabriel, Lisa Brunetti, Jan Fliessbach, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Montébran, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux, G. Merminod & G. Philippe
2024. Différences fonctionnelles entre quasi-synonymes : les interrogatives de raison en français. SHS Web of Conferences 191 ► pp. 14001 ff. DOI logo
Palasis, Katerina, Richard Faure & Fanny Meunier
2023. Wh-in-situ in child French: Deictic triggers at the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of French Language Studies 33:3 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Palasis, Katerina, Richard Faure & Frédéric Lavigne
2019. Explaining variation inwh-position in child French: A statistical analysis of new seminaturalistic data. Language Acquisition 26:2 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2016. Aspects of interrogative use in near-native French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:4 ► pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. The Ashby legacy. In On Spoken French [Studies in Language Companion Series, 226], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue