In:Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht
Edited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. 109–130
Topics at the left periphery in Russian
Published online: 5 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.06pol
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.06pol
This paper analyses a paradigm in Russian in which a preposed nominal stranding a numeral can show (paucal) number connectivity, with a gap following the numeral, or can appear in a non-agreeing (plural) form:
(1) theater-paucal/plural, there were three. paucal__
Numerous syntactic diagnostics confirm that, when there is number connectivity, the nominal has been fronted via A′-movement, creating a syntactic A′-chain dependency. In the absence of connectivity, the construction involves a hanging topic related via discourse mechanisms to a base-generated null pronoun. These two constructions constitute a minimal pair and can be considered a counterpart to the better-known left edge topics observed in Romance or Germanic languages.
References (57)
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2006. “Left Dislocation (including CLLD).” In
The Blackwell Companion to Syntax,
volume II, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 668–699. Malden: Blackwell. .
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1994. Clitic Dependencies in Modern Greek. Ph.D. Diss., University of Salzburg.
. 1997. “Clitic Left Dislocation and Contrastive Left Dislocation. In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, eds. 1997.
Materials on Left Dislocation
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aoun, Joseph, Abbas Benmamoun, and Lina Choueiri. 2010.
The Syntax of Arabic
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aoun, Joseph, and Lina Choueiri. 2000. “Epithets.”
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
18: 1–39. .
Bailyn, John. 1995. “Underlying Phrase Structure and Short Verb Movement in Russian.”
Journal of Slavic Linguistics
3: 13–58.
. 2003. “Does Russian Scrambling Exist?” In
Word Order and Scrambling
, ed. by Simin Karimi, 156–176. Malden: Blackwell. .
. 2007. “A Derivational Approach to Micro-variation in Slavic Binding.” In
Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15
, ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 25–41. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. “Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP Sublayers.” In
The structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures,
vol. 2, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2003.
Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bošković, Željko, 2006. “Case and Agreement with Genitive of Quantification in Russian.” In
Agreement Systems,
ed. by Cedric Boeckx, 99–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Choo, Suk-hoon, Jun-hee Hong, Ji-young Hwang. 2007. “Genitive-initial Sentences in Russian and the Typology of Case Assignment.”
Language and Linguistics
, 153–174
. 1997[1983]. “‘Topic’ Constructions in some European Languages and ‘Connectedness’.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 93–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Culicover, Peter. 2001. “Parasitic Gaps: A History.” In
Parasitic Gaps
, ed. by Peter Culicover and Paul Postal, 3–68. Cambridge: MIT Press.
De Cat, Cecile. 2007.
French Dislocation: Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Escobar, Linda. 1997. “Clitic Left Dislocation and other Relatives.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation,
ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 233–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grewendorf, Gunther. 2008. “The Left Clausal Periphery: Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and Left Dislocation in German.” In
Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives
, ed. by Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, 49–94. New York: Routledge.
Hirschbühler, Paul. 1997. “On the Source of Lefthand NPs in French.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hornstein, Norbert, and Jairo Nunes. 2002. “On Asymmetries Between Parasitic Gap and Across-the-board Constructions.”
Syntax
5: 26–54. .
House, Richard. 1982. The Use of Genitive Initial Sentences for the Specification of Quantity in Russian. Ph.D. Diss., Cornell University.
Ivlieva, Natalia. 2007. “Parasitic Gaps in Russian.” In
Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15
, ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 132–140. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. “On the Formal and Functional Relationship between Topics and Vocatives: Evidence from French.” In
Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language
, ed. by Adele E. Golberg, 267–288.Stanford, CA: CSLI.
. 2001. “Dislocation.” In
Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook
. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 20). vol. 2, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible, 1050–1078. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lopez, Luis. 2009.
A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure
. Oxford: Oxford University Press. .
Partee, Barbara, and Vladimir Borschev. 2006. “Information Structure, Perspectival Structure, Diathesis Alternation, and the Russian Genitive of Negation.” In
Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Logic and Language (LoLa 9)
, 120–129. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In
Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax
, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. .
Sekerina, Irina. 1997. The Syntax and Processing of Scrambling Constructions in Russian. Ph.D. Diss., CUNY Graduate Center.
Sturgeon, Anne. 2008.
The Left Periphery: The Interaction of Syntax, Pragmatics and Prosody in Czech
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2006. “Strong vs. Weak Islands.” In
Blackwell Companion to Syntax
vol. 4
,
ed. by Martin Everaert and Riemsdijk Henk van, 479–531.Malden, MA: Blackwell. .
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1997. “Left Dislocation.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Riemsdjik, Henk, and Frans Zwarts. 1997. “Left Dislocation in Dutch and Status of Copying Rules.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vat, Jan. 1997. “Left Dislocation, Connectedness, and Reconstruction.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 67–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wiltschko, Martina. 1997. “Parasitic Operators in German Left-dislocation.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 307–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Xiang, Ming, Boris Harizanov, Maria Polinsky, and Ekaterina Kravtchenko. 2011. “Processing Morphological Ambiguity: An Experimental Investigation of Russian Numerical Phrases.”
Lingua
121: 548–560. .
Zaenen, Annie. 1997. “Contrastive Dislocation in Dutch and Icelandic.” In
Materials on Left Dislocation
, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 119–150. Amste.
