In:Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht
Edited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. 39–56
On the relationship between sentence focus category, subject-verb order, and genericity
A preliminary analysis of some Italian unaccusatives
Published online: 5 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.03rus
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.03rus
This paper examines the relationship among sentence focus, subject position (i.e., preverbal vs. postverbal) and genericity in Italian constructions involving two sub-classes of unaccusative verbs. It is shown that with unaccusatives denoting change of location (e.g., arrivare ‘arrive’), subject position depends on the number of arguments selected by the verb and the nature of the locative argument (i.e., overt vs. implicit); specifically, one-argument unaccusatives categorically disallow postverbal subjects, whereas two-argument unaccusatives require postverbal subjects only if the sentence refers to a specific situation and the locative is implicit. In contrast, two-argument unaccusatives selecting an experiencer/dative and a theme/subject argument (e.g., mancare ‘lack; be lacking’), always require postverbal subjects, independently of whether the sentence denotes a generic or a specific situation.
References (23)
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. “‘Inversion’ as Focalization.” In
Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar
, ed. by A. Hulk and J.-Y. Pollock, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. “Psych-verbs and θ-theory.”
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
6: 291–352. .
Benincà, Paola. 2001. “L’ordine degli elementi della frase.” In
Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione,
vol. 1, ed. by L. Renzi, G. Salvi and A. Cardinaletti, 129–239. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Carlson, Gregory. 1982. “Generic Terms and Generic Sentences.”
Journal of Philosophical Logic
11: 145–181. .
. 1987. “Exceptions to Generic Generalizations.” In
Mathematics of Language
, ed. by A. Manaster-Ramen, 19–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1989. “On the Semantic Composition of English Generic Sentences.” In
Properties, Types and Meaning
, ed. by G. Chierchia, B. Partee and R. Turner, 167–192. Dordrecht: Kluwer. .
. 2008. “Patterns in the Semantics of Generic Sentences.” In
Time and Modality
, ed. by J. Guéron and J. Lacarme, 17–38. Dordrecht: Kluwer. .
Fillmore, Charles. 1986. “Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora.”
Berkeley Linguistics Society
12: 95–107.
Krifka, Manfred, J. Francis Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meuleun, Godehard Link, and Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. “Genericity: An Introduction.” In
The Generic Book
, ed. by G.N. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier, 1–124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994.
Information Structure and Sentence Form
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2000. “When Subjects Behave like Objects: An Analysis of the Merging of S and O in Sentence-focus Constructions across Languages.”
Studies in Language
24: 611–682. .
Lee, Chungmin. 1996. “Generic Sentences are Topic Constructions.” In
Reference and Referent Accessibility
, ed. by T. Fretheim, and J.K. Gundel, 213–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Perlmutter, David. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” In
Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
, 157–189. Berkley Linguistics Society, University of California.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In
Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax
, ed. by L. Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. .
Russi, Cinzia. 2009. “On Italian volerci: Grammatical, Semantic, and Pragmatic Properties.”
Quaderni della Sezione di Glottologia e Linguistica del Dipartimento di Studi Medievali e Moderni, Università degli Studi “G. D’Annunzio”
19–20 (1): 117–155.
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2001. “La frase semplice.” In
Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione,
vol. 1, ed. by Renzi, G. Salvi and A. Cardinaletti, 37–172. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Tortora, Christina. 1998. “The Post-Verbal Subject Position of Italian Unaccusative Verbs of Inherently Directed Motion.” In
Semantic Issues in Romance Syntax
(Proceedings of the 26th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, LSRL26), ed. by E. Treviño and J. Lema, vol. 2, 283–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
