In:Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243] 2014
► pp. 277–302
Exploring verbal aggression in English historical texts using USAS
The possibilities, the problems and potential solutions
Published online: 11 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243.17arc
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243.17arc
This article investigates the ways in which we might use the UCREL Semantic Annotation System (USAS) to explore pragmatic phenomena relating to verbal aggression within Old Bailey trial texts dating from the late eighteenth century. Specifically, I demonstrate how this automated system can be used to identify potential leads into what I have called an aggression space, by way of the words, phrases and multi-word units captured by six USAS semantic-field tags: speech acts (Q2.2), im/politeness (S1.2.4+/-), (lack of) respect (S7.2+/-) and violence/anger (E3-). As these semtags, as they are known, have been designed with modern data in mind, I also discuss the problems which arise when using the tool to explore historical courtroom proceedings, and outline some potential solutions to these problems.
References (23)
Archer, Dawn. 2008. “Verbal Aggression and Impoliteness: Related or Synonymous?” In
Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice
, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 181–207. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2011. “Cross-examining Lawyers, Facework and the Adversarial Courtroom.”
Journal of Pragmatics
43 (13): 3216–3230.
Archer, Dawn, Jonathan Culpeper, and Matthew Davies. 2008. “Pragmatic Annotation.” In
Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook
, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, 613–642. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bousfield, Derek. 2008.
Impoliteness in Interaction
. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr. 2005.
Just Words: Law, Language, and Power
. 2nd ed. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Crystal, David. 1995.
The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.”
Journal of Pragmatics
25 (3): 349–367.
. 1998. “(Im)politeness in Dramatic Dialogue.” In
Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context
, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Mick Short, and Peter Verdonk, 83–95. London: Routledge.
. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.”
Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture
1 (1): 35–72.
. 2008. “Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power.” In
Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice
, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 17–44. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garside, Roger. 1987. “The CLAWS Word-tagging System.” In
The Computational Analysis of English
, ed. by Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech, and Geoffrey Sampson, 30–41. London: Longman.
Goffman, Erving. 1967.
Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior
. New York: Pantheon Books.
Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In
Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts
, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Hostettler, John. 2006.
Fighting for Justice: The History and Origins of Adversary Trial
. Winchester: Waterside Press.
Janney, Richard W. 2007. “‘So your story now is that...’: Metapragmatic Framing Strategies in Courtroom Interrogation.” In
Metapragmatics in Use
, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 223–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming.”
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
1 (1): 67–95.
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1995. “Language, Law, and Society: Policy Implications of the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial.”
Law & Society Review
29 (4): 669–701.
OED =
Oxford English Dictionary
, 3rd edition in progress. 1989–. Oxford University Press. Online: [URL]
.
Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913
(version 6.0, 21 June 2011). Compiled by Tim Hitchcock, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard, and Jamie McLaughlin et al., Online: [URL]
.
Pearson, Christine M., Lynne M. Andersson, and Judith W. Wegner. 2001. “When Workers Flout Convention: A Study of Workplace Incivility.”
Human Relations
54 (11): 1387–1419.
Rayson, Paul. 2009. “Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment.” Computing Department, Lancaster University. Online: [URL]
.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Landone, Elena
Taylor, Charlotte
2022. The affordances of metaphor for diachronic corpora & discourse analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 451 ff.
Archer, Dawn
Archer, Dawn
2017. Context and historical (socio-)pragmatics twenty years on. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Archer, Dawn & Bethan Malory
2017. Tracing facework over time using semi-automated methods. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Archer, Dawn & Cliff Lansley
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2015. Nineteenth-century institutional (im)politeness. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4], ► pp. 153 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.