Cover not available

In:Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 387–412

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students' communication through social networking sites

Published online: 4 February 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.19san
This chapter explores evaluative discourse on social networking sites (henceforth SNSs), paying special attention to the role played by the expression of attitude and positive politeness in the management of interpersonal rapport. The corpus for the study consists of a random sample of 100 messages exchanged among university students in the United Kingdom and the United States on a particular site, i.e., Facebook, during the two-year period 2010–2012. Analysis is approached from the theories of appraisal (Martin and White 2005; Bednarek 2008) and politeness (Brown and Levinson 1987); and the methodology for processing the data borrows quantitative techniques from Corpus Linguistics. The findings indicate that specific contextual features of SNSs seem to trigger the production of attitudinal meanings of affect, judgement and appreciation, which are exploited for the relational work involved in the construction and maintenance of positive face.
References (34)
References
Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion Talk across Corpora. Houndmills/ New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian and Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald and Nash, Walter. 1990. Seeing through Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 2000. “Corpus analysis of evaluative lexis.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 38–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S.. 1994. “Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, Norman Y. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds), 1–17. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. St. Jerome: Manchester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne and Slade, Diana. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City: New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 2004 [1994/1985]. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. (Third edition revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2000. “Persuasive rhetoric in linguistics: A stylistic study of some features of the language of Noam Chomsky.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 28–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff (eds). 2000. Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin and Ide, Sachiko. 2005. Broadening the Horizons of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam and Watts, Richard J. 2005. “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and White, Peter R.R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Ana M. and Wartmann, Katherine L. 2009. Online Social Networking on Campus: Understanding what Matters in Student Culture. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sarah. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael. 2011. UAM Corpus Tool 2.7. Madrid: UAM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration.” Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA. Almeria, Spain, 3–5 April 2008.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santamaría-García, Carmen. 2005. La Negociación de Acuerdo en la Conversación Coloquial. Estudio Contrastivo: Español-Inglés. (CD ROM). Universidad Complutense de Madrid doctoral dissertation < [URL] >.
Forthcoming. “A compelling need to evaluate: social networking sites as tools for the expression of affect, judgment and appreciation.” In Intercultural Pragmatics, Istvan Kecskes and Jesús Romero-Trillo (eds), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sinclair, John, McH. and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Culturally Speaking. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2011. “Russian dolls, target-value mismatches, and evaluation.” Plenary at Int-Eval, International Workshop on the Evaluative Function of Language: Evaluation across Text-Types and Cultures. Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson Geoff and Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation: an introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy B.M. 1994. English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard, Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad. 2005. Politeness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2001. “Ciberpragmática: Entre la compensación y el desconcierto.” [URL] Congreso Internacional de la Lengua Española. Accessed 15 September 2011.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

del Saz-Rubio, Mᵃ Milagros
2024. From ‘low-class’ and ‘talentless’ to ‘narcissist and pathological liar’: a functional-pragmatic approach to Meghan Markle’s negative evaluation on X. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Andersson, Marta
2022. ‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Graham, Sage L. & Claire Hardaker
2017. (Im)politeness in Digital Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 785 ff. DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura
2016. The variables of the evaluative functional relationship. In Metapragmatics of Humor [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 14], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg
2015. Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2015. Review of Gil-Salom & Soler-Monreal (2014): Dialogicity in written specialised genres. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2016. Connected Parents: Combining Online and Off-Line Parenthood in Vlogs and Blogs. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2017. Emotional and Educational Consequences of (Im)politeness in Teacher–Student Interaction at Higher Education. Corpus Pragmatics 1:3 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Evaluative Discourse Metaphor in Online Communities [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 106], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue