Cover not available

In:Constructing Collectivity: 'We' across languages and contexts
Edited by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 239] 2014
► pp. 135–158

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

‘We’ as social categorization in Cha’palaa, 
a language of Ecuador

 | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Published online: 27 February 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.11flo
This chapter connects the grammar of the first person collective pronoun in the Cha’palaa language of Ecuador with its use in interaction for collective reference and social category membership attribution, addressing the problem posed by the fact that non-singular pronouns do not have distributional semantics (“speakers”) but are rather associational (“speaker and relevant associates”). It advocates a cross-disciplinary approach that jointly considers elements of linguistic form, situated usages of those forms in instances of interaction, and the broader ethnographic context of those instances. Focusing on large-scale and relatively stable categories such as racial and ethnic groups, it argues that looking at how speakers categorize themselves and others in the speech situation by using pronouns provides empirical data on the status of macro-social categories for members of a society.
References (34)
References
Allport, Gordon. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice . Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1971. “The nature of pronouns.” In Problems in General Linguistics , 217–222. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn and Wendi Gardner1996. “Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1): 83–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy J.2002. “Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit.” Linguistics 40(3): 611–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeBoer, Warren. 1995. “Returning to Pueblo Viejo: History and archaeology of the Chachi, Ecuador.” In Archaeology in the Lowland American tropics: Current Analytical Methods and Applications , Peter W. Stahl(ed.), 243–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickinson, Connie. 2000. “Mirativity in Tsafiki.” Studies in Language 24(2): 379–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Complex Predicates in Tsafiki . Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon.
Egbert, Maria. 2004. “Other-initiated repair and membership categorization—some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics 36(8): 1467–1498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J.2009. The Αnatomy of Μeaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas. J.2011. “Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge and agency.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation , Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig(eds), 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Robert and Housley, William. 2002. “Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in,” Discourse & Society 13(5): 579–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon. 2010. Discourse Forms and Social Categorization in Cha’palaa . Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hester, Stephen and Eglin, Peter. 1997a. Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis . Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997b. “Membership categorization analysis: An introduction.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis , Stephen Hester and Peter Eglin(eds), 1–23. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housley, William and Fitzgerald, Robert. 2002. “The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis.” Qualitative Research 2(1): 59–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Membership categorization, culture and norms in action.” Discourse & Society 20(3): 345–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housley, William and Smith, Robin J.2011. “Telling the CAQDAS code: Membership categorization and the accomplishment of ‘coding rules’ in research team talk.” Discourse Studies 13(4): 417–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena. 1984. Categorisation and Moral Order . London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jijón y Caamaño, Jacinto1914. Los Aborígenes de la Provincia de Imbabura: Los Cayapas en Imbabura . Madrid: Blass y Cía. Impresores.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.1993. “Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in interaction.” Text . 13(2): 213–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.2005. “Living with Manny’s dangerous idea.” Discourse Studies , 7(4–5): 431–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leudar, Ivan, Marsland, Vitoria, and Nekvapil, Jirí. 2004. “On Membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse.” Discourse & Society 15(2): 243–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. “The MIR Membership Categorization Device.” In Lectures on Conversation , Gail Jefferson(ed.), 40–48. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language 52(2): 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. “Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization.” Discourse Studies . 9(4): 433–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description,” in Meaning and Anthropology , Keith Basso and Henry Selby, (eds), 11–55. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth H.2003. “Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorisation in neighbour disputes.” Feminism and Psychology 13: 317–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1989. “The ‘I’ of discourse,” In Semiotics, Self, and Society . Benjamin Lee and Greg Urban, (eds), 27–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wade, Peter. 2010. Race and Ethnicity in Latin America . 2nd edition. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen2010. “What ‘You’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person marking, self-ascription, and theory of mind.” Language 86(2): 332–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitten, Norman E., Jr. 1974. Black Frontiersmen: A South American Case . New York: Schenkman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Floyd, Simeon
2019. Body-directed gesture and expressions of social difference in Chachi and Afro-Ecuadorian discourse. Gesture 18:2-3 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Floyd, Simeon, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid
2018. Smell Is Coded in Grammar and Frequent in Discourse: Cha'palaa Olfactory Language in Cross‐Linguistic Perspective. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue