In:Constructing Collectivity: 'We' across languages and contexts
Edited by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 239] 2014
► pp. 65–82
Referential and functional aspects of the Norwegian first person plural vi
Published online: 27 February 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.07bor
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.07bor
This paper explores questions of reference and communicative functions of the Norwegian first-person plural pronoun vi, based on transcripts of video recorded conversations between patients and nursing students or medical students. While many authentic examples of vi seem to be at odds with the meaning of vi proposed in Borthen (2010), we argue that the discrepancy is only apparent and can be accounted for through a pragmatic, relevance-theoretic analysis (Sperber and Wilson 1995). We compare this analysis to a sense enumeration approach and claim that the former is preferred for cognitive reasons. We show how pragmatic processes and principles can explain the fluidity of vi, and how our analysis is compatible with various communicative functions of the pronoun.
References (16)
. 2001. “Accessibility theory: An overview.” In
Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects
, Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren(eds), 29–87. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Carston, Robyn. 2002.
Understanding Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication
. Oxford: Blackwell.
Donnellan, Keith S.1966. “Reference and definite descriptions.”
The Philosophical Review
75: 281–304.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy and Zacharski, Ron.1993. “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.”
Language
69: 274–307.
Hedley, Paul, 2007.
Anaphora, Relevance, and the Conceptual/Procedural Distinction
. Unpublished PhD thesis, Magdalen College, Oxford.
Leech, Geoffrey N. and Svartvik, Jan.1978.
A Communicative Grammar of English Based on a Grammar of Contemporary English by Randolph Quirk
. London: Longman.
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “Notes on the systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “yeah” and “hm mm”.”
Papers in Linguistics
1: 197–206.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre.1995.
Relevance: Communication and Cognition
, 2nd
edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Bazzanella, Carla
2014. Grammar, interaction, and context. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 83 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
