Cover not available

In:Constructing Collectivity: 'We' across languages and contexts
Edited by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 239] 2014
► pp. 45–64

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Singular perception, multiple perspectives through ‘we’

Constructing intersubjective meaning in English and German

ORCiD logo with link | The University of Nottingham, UK
Published online: 27 February 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.06whi
This paper presents the results of a corpus-based investigation of the role of the first-person plural pronoun in the construction of intersubjective meaning among evidential perception verbs of sight and sound in English and German (with most attention being given to written rather than spoken data). Whereas the first-person singular pronoun only signifies that the evidence rests solely with the speaker/writer, the first-person plural pronoun allows a much wider range of intersubjective meanings concerning the nature of the evidence. It is also shown how English and German perception verbs express intersubjective evidential meaning in a number of different complementation patterns, how the type of this meaning is often linked to these patterns, and how the use of the first-person plural pronoun can vary among and within these constructions. The possibility of a diachronic development in this domain is also given some attention, hence data are drawn from the Early Modern and Modern periods of these two languages.
References (35)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.2004. Evidentiality . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1971 (1966). Problems in General Linguistics , Mary E. Meek(trans). Coral Gables, FL: The University of Miami Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and effect.” Text 9(1): 93–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bréal, Michel.1900. Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning , Mrs.Henry Cust(trans). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.2012. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology , Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols(eds), 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele and Elena Smirnova. 2010. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization . Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2010. The Event Structure of Perception Verbs . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas and Jasper Holmes. 2007. “A history of English evidential verbs of appearance.” English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grund, Peter J.2012. “The nature of knowledge: Evidence and evidentiality in the witness depositions from the Salem witch trials.” American Speech 87(1): 7–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haan, Ferdinand de.2001. “The relation between modality and evidentiality.” In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen , Reimar Müller and Marga Reis(eds), 201–216. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harm, Volker. 2000. Regularitäten des Semantischen Wandels bei Wahrnehmungsverben des Deutschen . Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 (1957). “Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb.” In Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings. Vol. II: Word and Language . The Hague: Mouton, 130–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.2003. “Evidentials: Summation, questions, prospects.” In Studies in Evidentiality , Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon(eds), 307–327. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark.2003 [1980]. Metaphors We Live By . 2nd edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.1990. “Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. “Losing control: Grammaticalization, subjectification, and transparency.” In Historical Semantics and Cognition , Andreas Blank and Peter Koch(eds), 147–175. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom.1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.2001. Mood and Modality . 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena. 2006. Die Entwicklung der Konstruktion würde + Infinitiv im Deutschen: Eine Funktional-semantische Analyse unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung Sprachhistorischer Aspekte. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. “From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization.” In Perspectives in Historical Linguistics , W. P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel(eds), 245–271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. “On the rise of epistemic meaning in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change.” Language 65: 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: The case of promise and threaten.” In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives , Toril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westvik(eds), 185–210. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Dasher, Richard B.2002. Regularity in Semantic Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke.1983. “The verbs of perception: A typological study.” Linguistics 21: 123–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitt, Richard J.2009. “Auditory evidentiality in English and German: The case of perception verbs.” Lingua 119(7): 1083–1095. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Evidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German . Oxford/Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “(Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(1): 347–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Günthner, Susanne & Jie Zhao
2025. Formen des Agency-Displays in chinesischen und deutschen universitären Sprechstundengesprächen – der „uneigentliche“ Gebrauch der Pronomen der ersten Person Plural 我们 wǒmen und wir . Interkulturelles Forum der deutsch-chinesischen Kommunikation 5:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Barczewska, Shala
2024. ‘We Need to Ask Ourselves’: We, As A Marker of (Inter)Subjectivity in Academic Debate. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 69:1 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Fried, Mirjam
2021. Discourse-referential patterns as a network of grammatical constructions. Constructions and Frames 13:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Whitt, Richard J.
2018. Evidentiality and propositional scope in Early Modern German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
2017. “We are going to our Portuguese homeland!”. Narrative Inquiry 27:2 ► pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
2019. “We are going to our Portuguese homeland!”. In Storytelling in the digital world [Benjamins Current Topics, 104], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Steele, Felicia Jean
2017. Studies in the history of the English language VIII: Generalizing vs. particularizing methodologies in historical linguistic analysis. 2016. Ed. by Don Chapman, Colette Moore & Miranda Wilcox. Diachronica 34:4 ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Sociopragmatics of Stance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 329], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue