Cover not available

In:Language and Food: Verbal and nonverbal experiences
Edited by Polly E. Szatrowski
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 238] 2014
► pp. 131–156

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Modality and evidentiality in Japanese and American English taster lunches

Identifying and assessing an unfamiliar drink

Published online: 10 January 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.238.06sza
This study investigates how Japanese and American English speakers use modal/ evidential forms and body movments to identify and assess an unfamiliar drink at a taster lunch. Results show that the Japanese used more sensory evidential forms, truth approximation forms, and final particles to request agreement, while Americans used more forms to express their personal belief/ opinion directly. A comparison of the conversational development in which belief/ opinion forms were used showed that while Americans used I think in successive utterances, Japanese speakers used to omou ‘(I) think’ after a differing opinion(s) had been expressed to finalize their opinion and summarize the discussion. Results contribute to research on modality/ evidentiality in conversational interaction, cross-cultural understanding, and language and food.
References (29)
References
Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2004). Evidentiality . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. InW. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 261–272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1990). Quotation as demonstrations. Language , 66, 764–805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. InA. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 147–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. InN. Budwig, I. C. Uzgris, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 33–54). Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2011). Contextures of action. InJ. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 182–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1990). Conflict in Japanese conversation . (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
(2004). Managing topics in conversation in Japanese. InP. Szatrowski (Ed.), Hidden and open conflict in Japanese conversational interaction (pp. 29–64). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamio, A. (1994). The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics , 21(1), 67–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G. (1992). Assisted story telling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology , 15(3), 247–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masuoka, T. (1991). Modariti no bunpoo [A grammar of modality]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Nihongo no modarit(e)i tankyuu [Investigations of Japanese modality]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masuoka, T., & Takubo, Y. (1992). Kiso nihongo bunpoo- Kaiteeban [Basic Japanese grammar- Revised edition]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minami, F. (1974). Gendai nihongo no koozoo [Structure of modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Gendai nihongo bunpoo no rinkaku [Outline of modern Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizziconi, B. (2009). The interactive consequences of epistemic indexicality- Some thoughts on the epistemic marker -kamosirenai . InB. Pizziconi & M. Kizu (Eds.), Japanese modality (pp. 259–286). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szatrowski, P. (1993). Nihongo no danwa no koozoo bunseki- Kanyuu no danwa no sutoratezii no koosatu [Structure of Japanese conversation-Invitation strategies]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Kyoodoo hatuwa ni okeru sankasya no tatiba to gengo/ higengo koodoo no kanren ni tuite [Relation between participant status and verbal/ nonverbal behavior in co-construction]. Nihongo Kagaku [Japanese Linguistics], 7, 44–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Syntactic projectability and co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Berkeley Linguistics Society , 28, 315–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Subjectivity, perspective and footing in Japanese co-construction. InR. Zacharski & N. Hedberg (Eds.), Topics on the grammar-pragmatics interface: Essays in honor of Dr. Jeanette K. Gundel (pp. 313–339). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Sisyokukai no gengo/ higengo koodoo ni tuite- 30-sai miman no zyosee guruupu o tyuusin ni [Verbal and nonverbal behavior in a taster lunch- Focusing on a group of women under 30]. Hikaku Nihongaku Kyooiku Kenkyuu Sentaa Kenkyuu Nenpoo [Center for Comparative Japanese Studies Annual Bulletin], 7, 281–292. (Ochanomizu University)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Tabemono o hyooka-suru sai ni motiirareru “kyakukanteki hyoogen” to “syukanteki hyoogen” ni tuite [On the use of “subjective” and “objective” expressions for food assessment in Japanese]. Kokuritu Kokugo Kenkyuuzyo Ronbunsyuu [NINJAL Research Papers], 5, 95–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology 42 , 513–531.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jucker, Andreas H.
2024. Speech Acts, DOI logo
Szatrowski, Polly
2022. How is laughter used to create and reinforce food attitudes in Japanese Dairy Taster Brunch conversations. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue