In:Advice in Discourse
Edited by Holger Limberg and Miriam A. Locher
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 221] 2012
► pp. 97–118
Chapter 5. The advising sequence and its preference structures in graduate peer tutoring at an American university
Published online: 24 May 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.07war
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.07war
As Heritage (1997: 166) notes, it is important to build an “overall ‘map’ of the interaction in order to look at the task orientation of particular institutional discourse.” This paper depicts the overall structure of graduate peer tutoring, and more specifically, the components of an advising sequence oriented to by the participants in graduate peer tutoring. The data set consists of 15 graduate peer tutoring sessions collected over a period of four years at a US university. A detailed analysis yields a composite picture of the advising sequence, which appears to be driven by two preferences: (1) a preference for grounding one’s advice in a specific problem in the manuscript, and (2) a preference for tutee-initiated solutions.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Lei, Rong
Tang, Chihsia
Vehviläinen, Sanna & Anne-Mari Souto
Leyland, Christopher
Feng, Bo & Eran Magen
Chevalier, Fabienne H.G. & John Moore
2015. Producing and managing restricted activities. In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 255], ► pp. 1 ff.
Lee, Cynthia
Shaw, Chloe, Jonathan Potter & Alexa Hepburn
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
