In:Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe
Edited by Marina Dossena and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 218] 2012
► pp. 13–30
The study of correspondence
Theoretical and methodological issues
Published online: 16 April 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.218.02dos
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.218.02dos
Language, be it remember’d, is not an abstract construction of the learn’d, or of dictionary-makers, but is something arising out of the work, needs, ties, joys, affections, tastes, of long generations of humanity, and has its bases broad and low, close to the ground. Its final decisions are made by the masses, people nearest the concrete, having most to do with actual land and sea.
(Walt Whitman, Slang in America, 1885)
Correspondence is an ideal field in which to ask significant research questions,
not only on the internal history of the language, but also on its socio-historical
varieties, and their relationship with prescriptive trends in linguistic commentary.
In addition, it invites reflections on what tools are in fact available to answer these
research questions. Huge numbers of letters, notes, circulars and memos are held
in private collections or stored in libraries and archives, but linguists seem to have
only just begun to scratch the surface of this extraordinary mine of manuscript or
typescript sources, especially as far as Late Modern times are concerned.
In recent years corpora have been compiled on the correspondence of specific authors, sampling collections from edited or unedited texts, or actually transcribing authentic manuscripts from a range of sources. All such enterprises are valid in their quest for reliable data, and it is important to stress their unifying traits. This contribution aims to discuss some significant problems facing linguists who intend to study Late Modern English correspondence, such as the quantity and quality of data available for investigation, issues in transcription and in corpus compilation and publication/distribution. Considerations will be based on the work carried out so far for the compilation of the Corpus of Nineteenth-century Scottish Correspondence (19CSC), in an attempt to assess experience and outline more encompassing methodological principles for future research. Special attention will be given to the application of such principles to the study of pragmatic moves in business and familiar correspondence.
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
Auer, Anita & Raymond Hickey
Oudesluijs, Tino
2024. “No criticism or remarks & pray burn it as fast as you read it”. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 180 ff.
Meluzzi, Chiara
Nakagawa, Ryo
Dossena, Marina
2019. “With kindest regards”. In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299], ► pp. 197 ff.
Dossena, Marina
2019. Singular, plural, or collective?. In Keeping in Touch [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 10], ► pp. 67 ff.
Paternoster, Annick & Susan Fitzmaurice
2019. Politeness in nineteenth-century Europe, a research agenda. In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299], ► pp. 1 ff.
Segal, Zef M.
Segal, Zef M.
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P., Karen P. Corrigan, Kevin McCafferty & Emma Moreton
Padilla-Moyano, Manuel
2015. A new view of Basque through eighteenth-century correspondence. In Language Variation - European Perspectives V [Studies in Language Variation, 17], ► pp. 169 ff.
Padilla-Moyano, Manuel
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2015. Nineteenth-century institutional (im)politeness. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4], ► pp. 153 ff.
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2017. Initiating contact in institutional correspondence. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Martineau, France & Sandrine Tailleur
2014. From local to supra-local. In Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900 [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 3], ► pp. 223 ff.
Rutten, Gijsbert, Rik Vosters & Wim Vandenbussche
2014. The interplay of language norms and usage patterns. Comparing the history of Dutch, English, French and German. In Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900 [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 3], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
