In:Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse
Edited by Eija Suomela-Salmi and Fred Dervin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 193] 2009
► pp. 123–134
Author identity in economics and linguistics abstracts
Published online: 19 November 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.193.08dah
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.193.08dah
In this paper I present as part of the KIAP project (see Fløttum’s paper, this volume) an analysis of 160 English and Norwegian research article abstracts within economics and linguistics with a view to characterising the various identities or roles assumed by the author. Three different roles are established, viz. the author as writer, as researcher and as arguer. My findings indicate an economics author who primarily assumes the role of researcher, while the linguist most often assumes the role of arguer. As regards language, there are similarities in author behaviour in English and Norwegian for economics, but differences for linguistics.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Nguyen, Minh Hieu
Yang, Jingwen
Rørvik, Sylvi
2021. Cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic uses of tensed verb phrases in the
methods sections of master’s theses. In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101], ► pp. 255 ff.
Kozubíková Šandová, Jana
Galatanu, Olga
Vassileva, Irena G.
2014. Bulgarian ‘we’ and audience involvement
in academic writing. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 287 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
