In:Constraints in Discourse
Edited by Anton Benz and Peter Kühnlein
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 172] 2008
► pp. 69–95
4. Strong generative capacity of RST, SDRT and discourse dependency DAGSs
Published online: 10 April 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.172.04dan
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.172.04dan
The aim of this paper0 is to compare the discourse structures proposed in rst, sdrt and dependency dags which extend the semantic level of mtt for discourses. The key question is the following: do these formalisms allow the representation of all the discourse structures which correspond to felicitous discourses and exclude those which correspond to infelicitous discourses? Hence the term of “strong generative capacity” taken from formal grammars.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Potter, Andrew
Maiorani, Arianna, John A. Bateman, Chun Liu, Dayana Markhabayeva, Russell Lock & Massimiliano Zecca
Taboada, Maite
2019. The space of coherence relations and their signalling in discourse. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Asher, Nicholas, Philippe Muller, Myriam Bras, Lydia Mai Ho-Dac, Farah Benamara, Stergos Afantenos & Laure Vieu
Bateman, John A.
2014. Multimodal coherence research and its applications. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 145 ff.
Keskes, Iskandar, Farah Benamara Zitoune & Lamia Hadrich Belguith
Vergez-Couret, Marianne, Laurent Prévot & Myriam Bras
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.