In:Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric
Edited by Ulla Connor, Ed Nagelhout and William Rozycki
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 169] 2008
► pp. 45–62
Metadiscourse across three varieties of English: American, British, and advanced learner English
Published online: 9 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.169.06ade
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.169.06ade
This chapter focuses on the pervasive phenomenon of metadiscourse, or reflexivity in language, looking at argumentative essay writing by university students. It presents a study of three varieties of English, using two corpora of native-speaker writing (British and American) and one corpus of advanced learner writing (L1 Swedish). Considerable differences are shown to exist in the use of metadiscourse, not just between the learners and the native speakers, but also between the British and American writers. The differences are evident both in general frequencies across corpora and in the functions the metadiscourse serves. Four factors are identified as potentially accounting for the variation found: genre comparability, cultural conventions, register awareness and general learner strategies.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Chen, Qian & Yaping Li
Akbaş, Erdem, Gülin Dağdeviren-Kirmizi & Özkan Kirmizi
Alshbeekat, Aseel & Anas Awwad
Chen, Chunmei & Qingshun He
Abuelgasim S. E. Mohammed & Abdulaziz B. Sanosi
Alghazo, Sharif, Khulood Al-Anbar , Abdel Rahman Altakhaineh & Marwan Jarrah
Congcong, Wang
McKeown, Jamie
Jürine, Anni, Djuddah Leijen, Helen Hint, Jolanta Sinkuniene, Diāna Laiveniece, Christer Johansson & Nicholas Groom
Deza Blanco, Pablo
Zaini, Amin & Sue Ollerhead
Huang, Ying & Kate Rose
Chen, Meilin
Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
