Stancetaking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker

Keisanen, Tiina

doi:10.1075/pbns.164.10kei

In:Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction
Edited by Robert Englebretson
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164] 2007
► pp. 253–281

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Stancetaking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker

Tiina Keisanen | University of Oulu

Published online: 25 October 2007

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.10kei

Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Order by:

Liu, Xiuli

2025. Mapping Stance in Data Protection Judgments: Towards an Integrated Framework for Judicial Discourse. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance

Xue, Lu & Shuangyun Yao

2025. From indicating similarity to establishing online alignment: interactional functions of ye “also” in Mandarin Chinese. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1

Kindell, Jacqueline, John Keady & Ray Wilkinson

2024. On the Use of Tag Questions by Co-participants of People with Dementia. In Dementia and Language, ► pp. 151 ff.

Küttner, Uwe-A.

2024. When excuse me means excuse you! . Interactional Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 158 ff.

Küttner, Uwe-A. & Beatrice Szczepek Reed

2024. Request for confirmation sequences in British and American English. Open Linguistics 10:1

Michelson, Kristen & Joshua J. Thoms

2024. Introduction. In Digital Social Reading and Second Language Learning and Teaching [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 21], ► pp. 1 ff.

Zhao, Liang

2024. Identity negotiation of Han women in Han-Hui-Muslim intermarriage in China: A dialogical-self theory approach. Culture & Psychology 30:4 ► pp. 903 ff.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Sandra A. Thompson & Barbara A. Fox

2023. Do English affirmative polar interrogatives with any favor negative responses?. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 350 ff.

Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole

2022. Conversational functions of ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’ in collaborative writing of primary school children. Classroom Discourse 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Riccioni, Ilaria, Andrzej Zuczkowski, Roberto Burro, Ramona Bongelli & Claudia Felser

2022. The Italian epistemic marker mi sa [to me it knows] compared to so [I know], non so [I don’t know], non so se [I don’t know whether], credo [I believe], penso [I think]. PLOS ONE 17:9 ► pp. e0274694 ff.

Zinken, Jörg & Uwe-A. Küttner

2022. Offering an Interpretation of Prior Talk in Everyday Interaction: A Semantic Map Approach. Discourse Processes 59:4 ► pp. 298 ff.

Hebenstreit, Bryanna L. & Alan Zemel

2021. Chapter 1.2. Affect in interaction. In How Emotions Are Made in Talk [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 321], ► pp. 51 ff.

Matalon, Nadav

2021. The Camel Humps prosodic pattern. In Building Categories in Interaction [Studies in Language Companion Series, 220], ► pp. 155 ff.

Pennec, Blandine

2021. Positionnements énonciatifs évolutifs : le cas des réajustements discursifs. Anglophonia 32

Postoutenko, Kirill & Olga Sabelfeld

2021. Temporal comparisons, historical semantics of interaction and ‘post-war consensus’ in British Parliament: Studying time references in a deliberative environment. Time & Society 30:4 ► pp. 598 ff.

Bonnin, Juan Eduardo

2019. Double stance discourse: Managing social and personal identity at work. Discourse & Society 30:4 ► pp. 359 ff.

Soler, Josep & Lídia Gallego-Balsà

2019. Clashing Stances Towards Catalan: An Ethnographic Study in a Small University in Catalonia. In The Sociolinguistics of Higher Education, ► pp. 67 ff.

Kiesling, Scott F., Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Jim Fitzpatrick, Xiaochuang Han & Jacob Eisenstein

2018. Interactional Stancetaking in Online Forums. Computational Linguistics 44:4 ► pp. 683 ff.

Takanashi, Hiroko

2018. Stance. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 173 ff.

Laanesoo, Kirsi & Leelo Keevallik

2017. Noticing Breaches with Nonpolar Interrogatives: Estonian Kes (“Who”) Ascribing Responsibility for Problematic Conduct . Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:3 ► pp. 286 ff.

Szczyrbak, Magdalena

2016. Sayand stancetaking in courtroom talk: a corpus-assisted study. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 143 ff.

Szczyrbak, Magdalena

2017. Modal Adverbs of Certainty in EU Legal Discourse: A Parallel Corpus Approach. In Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 5], ► pp. 91 ff.

Johansson, Marjut

2015. Bravo for this editorial!. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 83 ff.

Klein, Gabriella B., Koffi M. Dossou & Sergio Pasquandrea

2014. Embodying epistemicity. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 223 ff.

Chindamo, Massimo, Jens Allwood & Elisabeth Ahlsen

2012. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, ► pp. 617 ff.

Haddington, Pentti

2012. Pragmatics of Stance. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Heinemann, Trine

2008. Questions of accountability: yes—no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 55 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],

[no author supplied]

2017. Epistemic Stance in Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 29],

[no author supplied]

2024. Dementia and Conversational Strategies. In Dementia and Language, ► pp. 101 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.