This book approaches cohesion and coherence from a perspective of interaction and collaboration. After a detailed account of various models of cohesion and coherence, the book suggests that it is fruitful to regard cohesion as contributing to coherence, as a strategy used by communicators to help their fellow communicators create coherence from a text. Throughout the book, the context-sensitive and discourse-specific nature of cohesion is stressed: cohesive relations are created and interpreted in particular texts in particular contexts.
By investigating the use of cohesion in four different types of discourse, the study shows that cohesion is not uniform across discourse types. The analysis reveals that written dialogue (computer-mediated discussions) and spoken monologue (prepared speech) make use of similar cohesive strategies as spoken dialogue (conversations): in these contexts the communicators’ interaction with their fellow communicators leads to a similar outcome. The book suggests that this is an indication of the communicators’ attempt to collaborate towards successful communication.
“This book is useful. The style of writing is remarkably clear, and technical terms are well-defined. The main contribution of the book is the reconstructed model of lexical cohesion relations. It offers an insightful way to analyze lexical cohesion, particularly collocations, which are perceived as a challenge to deal with. In addition, it sheds light on the characteristics of lexical cohesion in different text types from varied contextual features. With regard to its audience, this book may be of interest not only to experienced academics, but also to graduate and postgraduate students wishing to learn more about lexical cohesion analysis and a new model for such analysis.”
Angkana Tongpoon, in Linguist List Vol. 18.646 (2007)
Cited by (63)
Cited by 63 other publications
Li, Xi & Mo Chen
2026. Assessing the effects of explicit coherence instruction on EFL students’ integrated writing performance. Assessing Writing 67 ► pp. 101019 ff.
2026.
Cognitive processing of anaphoric encapsulation and coreference in native Spanish speakers: an experimental approach with
eye tracking
. Discourse Processes 63:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kawabata, Desiree & Ben Fenton-Smith
2025. Incoherent coherence? Using systemic functional linguistics to improve oral language assessment literacy. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 48:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lect: Raghdah Naeem Khudhair
2025. An Analysis of Coherence in Arthur Miller's Play ''Death of a Salesman''. Journal of Education College Wasit University 58:2 ► pp. 453 ff.
Lee, Eunjung & Silo Chin
2025. Resolving Pronoun Ambiguity: Comparing Bible Translations in English
and an Artificial Auxiliary Language. Journal of Universal Language 26:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Zahnitko, Anatolii & Viktoriia Andrushchenko
2025. Fictive conversational cohesive patterns of the category of the addresser in the Ukrainian literary text. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 16:1 ► pp. 287 ff.
2022. Effects of Content Support and Planning Instruction on Discourse Connection in EFL Argumentative Writing. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Faraj, Ghusoon K.
2021. Conjunctions as Cohesive Devices in Some Selected Animated Movies: A Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 11:3
Ahmad, Zulfiqar
2020. Summative Assessment, Test Scores and Text Quality: A Study of Cohesion as an Unspecified Descriptor in the Assessment Scale. European Journal of Educational Research volume-9-2020:volume-9-issue-2-april-2020 ► pp. 523 ff.
Giray, Görkem & Murat Osman Ünalır
2020. Assessment of text coherence using an ontology‐based relatedness measurement method. Expert Systems 37:3
Lewandowski, Marcin
2020. Cohesion in Polish-English Translation and Its Implications for Translator Training. Research in Language 18:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Ahmad, Muhammad, Muhammad Asim Mahmood & Ali Raza Siddique
2019. Organisational Skills in Academic Writing: A Study on Coherence and Cohesion in Pakistani Research Abstracts. Languages 4:4 ► pp. 92 ff.
BELOV, Vadim A.
2019. The usage functions of synonyms in different types of text. Neophilology :19 ► pp. 265 ff.
Rajović, Jelena
2019. Elements of cohesion in the translation of poetry in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland with the focus on a poem "You are old, Father William". Bastina :47 ► pp. 53 ff.
Taboada, Maite
2019. Cohesion and Conjunction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 311 ff.
2018. “Claim – Support – Question” Routine to Foster Coherence Within Interactive Oral Communication Among EFL Students. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development 20:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Hoek, Jet, Sandrine Zufferey, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders
2018. “… and not building on that”: The Relation of Low Coherence and Creativity in Design Conversations. In Design Thinking Research [Understanding Innovation, ], ► pp. 195 ff.
2014. Measuring Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Learner Language: Comparing the Incomparable?. Research in Language 12:4 ► pp. 377 ff.
Abdul Rahman, Zuhair Abdul Amir
2013. The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Writing by Omani Student-Teachers. Sage Open 3:4
Ghiban, Ioan Cristian & Ştefan Trǎuşan-Matu
2013. Network Based Analysis of Intertextual Relations. In Advances in Information Systems and Technologies [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 206], ► pp. 753 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.