In:Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past
Edited by Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen and Brita Wårvik
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 134] 2005
► pp. 123–141
Personal pronouns in argumentation
An early tobacco controversy
Published online: 24 March 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.13rat
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.13rat
This article examines the use of personal pronouns in argumentation in two medical texts about the health effects of tobacco. The pamphlets were written in 1601 and 1602; the latter was written as a reply to the first. My method is qualitative, combining elements from different theories and it is unlike to any previous work done in the field. The analysis of personal pronouns draws mostly on Katie Wales's theory of present-day personal pronouns (1996). Central concepts of the theory are endophora and exophora and egocentric and vocative tendencies of generalised references. The present study also considers the affective (emotive) quality of personal pronouns. The analysis shows considerable variation between the texts in the use of personal pronouns and argumentative strategies.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. Interpersonality in legal written discourse. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 171 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.