A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts

Stefanowitsch, Anatol

doi:10.1075/pbns.113.09ste

In:Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 105–126

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts

Anatol Stefanowitsch

Published online: 17 July 2003

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.09ste

Cited by (34)

Cited by 34 other publications

Order by:

Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Richard Waltereit

2025. Cyclic Change in Grammar and Discourse,

Jiménez-Briones, Rocío

2025. Compiling a Corpus of User-Generated Content Units for the Detection of Social Problems. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 23:1

Uhrig, Peter & Thomas Herbst

2024. How Collostructional Analysis Contributes to the Description of Argument Structure Constructions with Slots for that- and Infinitive Clauses. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 72:3 ► pp. 213 ff.

Ackermann, Tanja

2023. Mitigating strategies and politeness in German requests. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2 ► pp. 355 ff.

Trotzke, Andreas

2023. Non-Canonical Questions,

Nikiforidou, Kiki

2022. Constructional analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 310 ff.

Kuo, Yueh Hsin

2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 95 ff.

Kuo, Yueh Hsin

2022. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Diachronica 39:1 ► pp. 88 ff.

Kuo, Yueh Hsin

2025. Bidirectional changes between modal and conditional in Mandarin. In Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 353], ► pp. 104 ff.

Guryev, Alexander & François Delafontaine

2020. Language activity in the light of cerebral hemisphere differences. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 91 ff.

Trott, Sean & Federico Rossano

2020. The Role of Entitlement in Formatting Preferences Across Requesters and Recipients. Discourse Processes 57:7 ► pp. 551 ff.

Cappelle, Bert, Ilse Depraetere & Mégane Lesuisse

2019. The necessity modalshave to,must,need to, andshould. Constructions and Frames 11:2 ► pp. 220 ff.

Meibauer, Jörg

2019. What is an indirect speech act?. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:1 ► pp. 61 ff.

Mompean, Jose A. & Javier Valenzuela Manzanares

2019. Brexit means Brexit: a constructionist analysis. Complutense Journal of English Studies 27 ► pp. 1 ff.

Trott, Sean & Benjamin Bergen

2019. Individual Differences in Mentalizing Capacity Predict Indirect Request Comprehension. Discourse Processes 56:8 ► pp. 675 ff.

Lang, Jun

2018. “I am not criticizing you”. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2 ► pp. 184 ff.

Cappelle, Bert

2017. What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 115 ff.

Iza Erviti, Aneider

2017. An exploratory study of complementary contrastive discourse constructions in English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 210 ff.

Liedtke, Frank

2017. Constructions, Templates and Pragmatics: Response to Cappelle. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 153 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2017. The role of inferencing in the interpretation of two expressive speech act constructions. In Constructing families of constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 109 ff.

Ruytenbeek, Nicolas

2017. The Comprehension of Indirect Requests: Previous Work and Future Directions. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 293 ff.

Vassilaki, Evgenia

2017. Chapter 4. Cognitive motivation in the linguistic realization of requests in Modern Greek. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 106 ff.

Cappelle, Bert & Ilse Depraetere

2016. Modal meaning in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Baicchi, Annalisa

2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 106 ff.

Depraetere, Ilse

2015. Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment. Anglophonia 19

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea

2014. The development of speech acts. In Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 10], ► pp. 37 ff.

Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar

2009. Indirect directives in recipes: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.

KONNO, HIROAKI

2004. THE IF YOU BE CONSTRUCTION AS A SPEECH ACT CONSTRUCTION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 21:1 ► pp. 34 ff.

[no author supplied]

2018. Threatening in English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 284],

[no author supplied]

2019. Causation and Reasoning Constructions [Constructional Approaches to Language, 25],

[no author supplied]

2020. Dualistic approaches to language and cognition. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 27 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100],

[no author supplied]

2025. Local Grammar Approaches to Speech Act Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 123],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.