Metonymy and conceptual blending

Coulson, Seana; Oakley, Todd

doi:10.1075/pbns.113.06cou

In:Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 51–79

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Metonymy and conceptual blending

Seana Coulson

Todd Oakley

Published online: 17 July 2003

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.06cou

Cited by (22)

Cited by 22 other publications

Order by:

Barnden, John

2025. Oxymoron and its interplay with metaphor and irony. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 126 ff.

Kravchenko, Nataliia

2025. COGNITIVE INTERPRETATION OF VISUAL METAPHOR: THE INTERFACE OF RELEVANCE THEORY, CONCEPTUAL BLENDING, AND CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR THEORIES. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 37 ff.

Adıgüzel, M. Fatih

2024. Conceptual Blending Theory: The Case of ‘Flying Bus’ from Turkish. Dil Araştırmaları 18:35 ► pp. 37 ff.

Elliot, Esi A., Carmina Cavazos & Ai Ming Chow

2024. From racialized brands to authentic brands: Dynamic conceptual blending. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 34:1 ► pp. 19 ff.

Borkent, Mike

2023. Comics and Cognition,

Golubeva, Tatiana

2023. The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 115 ff.

Barnden, John A.

2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff.

Kövecses, Zoltán

2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,

Moore, Kevin Ezra

2020. Moving Time vs. Frame-relative motion. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 272 ff.

Smith, Thomas H.

2020. Three metaphors in social science. In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 211 ff.

Novichkova, Lidiya Nikolaevna

2019. BLENDING THEORY AS A TECHNIQUE TO DECODE AUTHORIAL MEANING (BY THE MATERIAL OF F. M. DOSTOEVSKY’S PERSONAL LETTER). Philology. Theory & Practice 12:9 ► pp. 324 ff.

Riad, Sally

2019. The role of visual metonymy in leadership symbolism: Mapping its dynamics through the Sphinx. Leadership 15:4 ► pp. 480 ff.

Radden, Günter

2018. Molly married money. In Conceptual metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 161 ff.

Rocci, Andrea, Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli

2018. The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 123 ff.

Booth, Michael

2017. Shakespeare’s Poetry. In Shakespeare and Conceptual Blending, ► pp. 115 ff.

Borgogni, Daniele

2017. Clipped Wings and the Great Abyss: Cognitive Stylistics and Implicatures in Abiezer Coppe’s ‘Prophetic’ Recantation. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1 ► pp. 53 ff.

Molina Plaza, Silvia

2015. Black and White Metaphors and Metonymies in English and Spanish: A Cross-Cultural and Corpus Comparison. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3], ► pp. 39 ff.

Brandt, Line

2014. Metaphor and the Communicative Mind. SSRN Electronic Journal

Crisp, Peter

2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff.

Messerschmidt, Johanna & Luna Bergh

2011. Met kerse opmet-konstruksies: 'n Verwysingspuntperspektief. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 29:1 ► pp. 97 ff.

Brône, Geert & Seana Coulson

2010. Processing Deliberate Ambiguity in Newspaper Headlines: Double Grounding. Discourse Processes 47:3 ► pp. 212 ff.

Fougner Rydning, Atin

2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.