On the nature of conceptual metonymy: Introduction

Panther, Klaus-Uwe; Thornburg, Linda L.

doi:10.1075/pbns.113.03pan

In:Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Introduction

On the nature of conceptual metonymy

Klaus-Uwe Panther

Linda L. Thornburg

Published online: 17 July 2003

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.03pan

Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Order by:

Huang, Jie

2025. Loudness Metaphors in Chinese: Lexical and Corpus-Based Approaches. Metaphor and Symbol 40:3 ► pp. 259 ff.

Barcelona, Antonio

2024. Trends in cognitive-linguistic research on metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 51 ff.

Norboboyevna, Gulchexra Tursunova

2024. Cognitive Semantic Features of Phraseological Units Denoting Human Intellectual Abilities in English and Uzbek Language. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris 1:3 ► pp. 16 ff.

Littlemore, Jeannette

2023. ‘You’ll find Jane Austen in the basement’ … or Will You? Metonymy and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 143 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2022. Targetting metonymic targets. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 59 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2025. Metonymy typologies revisited. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 160 ff.

Vilar Lluch, Sara

2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 199 ff.

Chang, Miao-Hsia & Ún-giân Iûnn

2021. A corpus-based study of directives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 300 ff.

Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław

2020. Figures of speech revisited. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 225 ff.

Matusz, Łukasz

2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.

Sólyom, Réka

2020. Neologisms in Hungarian terms of quality assurance. Taikomoji kalbotyra :14 ► pp. 72 ff.

Zibin, Aseel, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Elham T. Hussein

2020. On the comprehension of metonymical expressions by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

Denroche, Charles

2019. Employing cognitive metonymy theory in the analysis of semantic relations between source and target text in translation. Metaphor and the Social World 9:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Ioannou, Georgios

2019. Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse. Topics in Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Komatsubara, Tetsuta

2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.

Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos

2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

Catalano, Theresa, Jill Fox & Saloshna Vandeyar

2016. Being “in a Limbo”: Perceptions of Immigration, Identity and Adaptation of Immigrant Students in South Africa and the United States. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 15:3 ► pp. 137 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe

2016. ‘Quo Vadimus?’ from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12:1 ► pp. 93 ff.

Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther

2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 215 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 168 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2018. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In Conceptual metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 121 ff.

Catalano, Theresa & John W. Creswell

2013. Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement. Qualitative Inquiry 19:9 ► pp. 664 ff.

Bagasheva, Alexandra

2012. The tastes and distastes of verbivores – some observations on X-phemisation in Bulgarian and English. Lexis :7

Haferland, Harald & Armin Schulz

2010. Metonymisches Erzählen. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 84:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol

2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1 ► pp. 64 ff.

Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog

2009. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis,

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden

2005. Metonymy. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. The Spatial Language of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 42],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.