In:Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region
Edited by Satomi Kawaguchi, Bruno Di Biase and Yumiko Yamaguchi
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 9] 2023
► pp. 280–300
Chapter 11Testing the validity of Processability Theory through a corpus-based analysis
The acquisition of plural marking in English speaking and writing by Japanese native speakers
Published online: 2 February 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.9.11yam
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.9.11yam
Abstract
This chapter presents part of the results of a learner corpus study to test the validity of Processability Theory (PT; Pienemann, 1998, 2005). It also addresses the issues of whether second language (L2) learners are at the same PT stages for speaking and writing. The results of the analysis of spoken and written narratives by 281 Japanese learners, focusing on the acquisition of the English plural marker ‑s on nouns, have demonstrated support for the hypothesised developmental sequence for English morphology in PT. In addition, a positive relationship has been found between the learners’ spoken and written production, suggesting that PT can legitimately be used to examine L2 writing as well as speaking.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Plural marking in English and Japanese
- 3.Developmental stages: Processability Theory (PT)
- 4.Literature review
- 4.1English plural marking
- 4.2Speaking versus writing
- 4.3Learner corpus research
- 5.The study
- 5.1Research design
- 5.1.1Participants
- 5.1.2Materials
- 5.1.3Data collection procedure
- 5.1.4Learner corpus construction
- 5.1.5Data size
- 5.1.6Data analysis
- 5.1Research design
- 6.Results and discussion
- 6.1Output frequency of the plural -s on nouns
- 6.2Acquisition of plural marking
- 6.3Comparison of PT stages between speaking and writing
- 7.Conclusion
Acknowledgements References
References (68)
Abrahamsson, N. (2013). Developmental sequences. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 173–177). Routledge.
Alderson, C. (1996). Do corpora have a role in language assessment? In J. Thomas & M. Short (Eds.), Using corpora for language research (pp. 248–259). Longman.
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24(2), 235–243.
Barker, F. (2010). How can corpora be used in language testing? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 633–645). Routledge.
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B. (2015). Grammatical Development in Second Languages: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory. European Second Language Association. [URL]
Bonilla, C. (2015). From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 31(1), 53–74.
Botting, N. (2002). Narrative as a tool for the assessment of linguistic and pragmatic impairments. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 18(1), 1–21.
Boulton, A. (2009). Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1), 37–54.
Cazden, C., Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1975). Second language acquisition in children, adolescents and adults. Final Report. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22–34.
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2009). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. Pearson Education.
Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L. (2011). Reassessing the applicability of Processability Theory: The case of nominal plural. Second Language Research, 27(4), 509–533.
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 185–198.
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18(3), 274–302.
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2015). The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monograph Series 3) (pp. 85–115). Eurosla.
Downing, P. A. (1996). Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. John Benjamins.
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23(2), 245–258.
Dyson, B. (2009). Processability Theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25(3), 355–376.
Eguchi, A., & Sugiura, M. (2015). Applicability of Processability Theory to Japanese adolescent EFL learners: A case study of early L2 syntactic and morphological development. System, 52, 115–126.
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20.
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323.
Grabowski, J. (2007). The writing superiority effect in the verbal recall of knowledge: Sources and determinants. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 163–179). Elsevier.
Granfeldt, J. (2008). Speaking and writing in L2 French: Exploring effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 87–98). KVAB Universa Press.
(2002). A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 3–33). John Benjamins.
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C. (2007). Processability Theory applied to written and oral Swedish. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 81–94). Cambridge Scholars.
Hughes, R. (2010). What a corpus tells us about grammar teaching materials. In A. O’Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 401–412). Routledge.
Itani-Adams, Y. (2011). Bilingual first language acquisition. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory (pp. 121–130). John Benjamins.
Johns, T. (1991). “Should you be persuaded”: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. In T. Johns, & P. King (Eds.), Classroom concordancing (ELR Journal, 4) (pp. 1–10). University of Birmingham.
Keßler, J.-U. (Ed.) (2008). Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning. Cambridge Scholars.
Kawaguchi, S. (2016). Question constructions, argument mapping, and vocabulary development in English L2 by Japanese speakers: A cross-sectional study. In J.-U. Keßler, A. Lenzing, & M. Liebner (Eds.), Developing and Assessing Second Language Grammars across Languages (pp. 35–63). John Benjamins.
Kawaguchi, S., & Di Biase, B. (2012). Acquiring procedural skills in L2: Processability theory and skill acquisition. Studies in Language Sciences, 11, 70–99.
Kormos, J. (2014). Differences across modalities of performance. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 Writing (pp. 193–216). John Benjamins.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). John Benjamins.
(2012). Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 143–170). John Benjamins.
Lenzing, A. (2013). The development of the grammatical system in early second language acquisition: The Multiple Constraints Hypothesis. John Benjamins.
Lenzing, A., Nicholas, H., & Roos, J. (2019). Widening contexts for Processability Theory. John Benjamins.
Lozano, C., & Mendikoetxea, A. (2013). Learners corpora and second language acquisition: The design and collection of CEDEL2. In A. Diaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp. 65–100). John Benjamins.
Luk, Z. P. S., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural ‑s, articles, and possessive ’s. Language Learning, 59(4), 721–754.
Maynard, S. K. (1990). An introduction to Japanese grammar and communication strategies. The Japan Times.
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Norrby, C., & Håkansson, G. (2007). The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability: The case of Swedish as a foreign language. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(1), 45–68.
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 109–148.
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186–214.
(1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. John Benjamins.
(Ed.) (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. John Benjamins.
Strömqvist, S., Nordqvist, Å., & Wengelin, Å. (2004). Writing the frog-story: Developmental and cross-modal perspectives. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 359–394). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2015). An investigation of Chinese students’ acquisition of oral and written English through the measurement of Processability Theory. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2), 207–212.
Usami, H. (2015). The application of corpus linguistics to language testing – improving multiple choice questions. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Yamaguchi, Y. (2009). The development of plural marking and plural agreement in child English L2 acquisition. In J.-U. Keßler, & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp. 9–39). Cambridge Scholars.
(2013). Child second language learning: A study of English as a second language acquisition. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Yamaguchi, Y. & Kawaguchi, S. (2014). Acquisition of English morphology by a Japanese school-aged child: A longitudinal study. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 16(1), 89–119.
Yamaguchi, Y., & Usami, H. (2017a). Japanese learners’ use of English grammar in speaking and writing: A processability approach. In Proceedings of Pacific Second Language Research Forum 2016 (pp. 237–242).
(2017b). Plural marking in spoken and written narratives: A corpus-based study of Japanese learners of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(5), 224–231.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Sakoda, Kumiko & Satomi Kawaguchi
2023. Japanese L2 corpora and SLA research. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 144 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
