Cover not available

In:Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region
Edited by Satomi Kawaguchi, Bruno Di Biase and Yumiko Yamaguchi
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 9] 2023
► pp. 258–279

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
The acquisition of polar questions in Chinese learners of English as a foreign language

A processability approach

 | The Australian National University
 | The Australian National University
Published online: 2 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.9.10li
Abstract
This chapter investigates the acquisition of English polar questions in a cross-sectional study of nine Chinese junior high school learners acquiring English as a Foreign Language in Inner Mongolia (China). Conducted within a Processability Theory framework, in particular the recently proposed Prominence Hypothesis, the study focuses on analytical issues, presenting a descriptive account of the structures learners produce when asking polar questions. These include intonation questions with canonical word order, the use of single and multi-word question markers, prefabricated patterns, and questions with non-canonical word order. Results are consistent, overall, with the predictive schedule for ESL/EFL as formulated in the Prominence Hypothesis. However, the data also contains questions consisting of a prefabricated pattern followed by a noun phrase, which do not fit either with the Lemma access stage or the Canonical word order stage. The authors argue that this type of question represents a separate stage between these two early stages.
Article outline
  • 1.Issues in researching the SLA of polar questions
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Learners
    • 2.2Data collection and transcription
  • 3.Analysis and results
    • 3.1Polar questions with canonical word order and rising intonation
    • 3.2Polar questions starting with a non-aux-like question marker
    • 3.3Polar questions starting with a prefabricated pattern
    • 3.4Polar questions potentially with non-canonical word order
      • 3.4.1Potential auxiliary ‘DO’
      • 3.4.2Potential auxiliary ‘BE’
      • 3.4.3Polar questions apparently starting with a modal verb
    • 3.5Summary of structures
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (41)
References
Alexander, L. G., & He, Q. X. (1997). New concept English 1: First things first. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B. (2015). Processability Theory: Theoretical bases and universal schedules. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monograph Series 3) (pp. 19–80). Eurosla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat. A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, M. (1999). A grammar writer’s cookbook. CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1978). The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E. M. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 207–230). Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M., & Mycock, L. (2019). The Oxford reference guide to lexical functional grammar. Oxford University Press, USA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2015). The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monograph Series 3) (pp. 85–116). Eurosla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. (2013). The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyson, B. (2004). Developmental style in second language processing: A study of inter-learner variation in the acquisition of English as a second language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Sydney.
(2008). What we can learn from questions: ESL question development and its implications for language assessment. Prospect, 23, 16–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R., Moravcsik, E. A., & Wirth, J. R. (1989). Implicational universals and interrogative structures in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Language Learning, 39(2), 173–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleta, M. T. (2001). Child L2 acquisition of interrogatives. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (IASCL), 1, 1356–1370.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Is-insertion in L2 grammars of English: A step forward between developmental stages. Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 85–96).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(2), 287–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. (1997). Child second language acquisition of English: A longitudinal case study of a Turkish-speaking child (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham University.
(2003). The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP. Second Language Research, 19(1), 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itani-Adams, Y., & Di Biase, B. (2016). Development of Yes/No questions in English-Japanese bilingual acquisition. Presented at The 16th International Symposium of Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition (PALA), Chuo University, Tokyo.
Jansen, L., & Li, R. (2018). To be or not to be? The acquisition of copular polar questions. Presented at The 17th International Symposium of Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition (PALA), The University of Sydney.
Johnston, M. (1997). Development and variation in learner language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University.
Lee, J. (2006). Korean children’s acquisition of English interrogatives. 영어학, 6(3), 637–653.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56(4), 693–720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 31–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mycock, L. (2007). Constituent question formation and focus: A new typological perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society, 105(2), 192–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Explaining developmental schedules. In M. Pienemann & J. U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory: An introductory textbook (pp. 50–63). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 199–251). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pozzan, L., & Quirk, E. (2014). Second language acquisition of English questions: An elicited production study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(6), 1055–1086. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravem, R. (1970). The development of wh-questions in first and second language learners. ERIC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sakai, H. (2008). An analysis of Japanese university students’ oral performance in English using processability theory. System, 36(4), 534–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 2–22). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 205–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. Applied linguistics, 16(2), 180–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Y. (2010). The acquisition of English as a second language by a Japanese primary school child: A longitudinal study from a processability viewpoint (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Sydney.
Yip, P.-C., & Rimmington, D. (2004). Chinese: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2004). Interrogative structures in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 89–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue