In:Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region
Edited by Satomi Kawaguchi, Bruno Di Biase and Yumiko Yamaguchi
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 9] 2023
► pp. 231–257
Chapter 9Developmentally moderated focus on form in an Indonesian kindergarten EFL programme
Isriani Hardini | K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid State Islamic University of Pekalongan | Western Sydney University
Published online: 2 February 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.9.09har
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.9.09har
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of Developmentally Moderated Focus on Form (DMFonF) focusing on plural marking in English L2 in Indonesian kindergarten children. Before the study, these children learned English through a communicative programme. The study, designed within the Processability Theory framework, included a pre-test, DMFonF intervention, and post-test. Two kindergarten classes, K1 (first-year, n = 10) and K2 (second-year, n = 10), participated in the study. At pre-test, all children were at the single-word stage. That was after K1 children learned English for one semester and K2 for three semesters. After the one semester-DMFonF intervention, all children acquired lexical plural marking, and most of them also acquired phrasal plural agreement. This finding suggests that DMFonF is effective in promoting early L2 grammatical development.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Expressions of plurality in Indonesian and English
- 3.Studies on the acquisition of plural marking in English as a second language (ESL)
- 4.Theoretical frameworks
- 4.1Processability Theory and Teachability Hypothesis
- 4.2Focus on Form
- 4.3Developmentally moderated focus on form (DMFonF)
- 5.Research design
- 6.Results
- 6.1Lexical development at pre-test and post-test
- 6.2Grammatical development at pre-test and post-test
- 6.2.1The baseline from the meaning-based programme
- 6.2.2The Post-test results after DMFonF intervention
- 7.Discussion
- 8.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (53)
Ahmad Sabri, A. A., Mohammed Salleh, R. T. A., & Di Biase, B. (2021). Instructing Malaysian Children with HFASD in English as a Second Language. Asiatic, 15(1), 92–114.
Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., & Moeliono, A. (2003). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.
Barner, D., Lui, T., & Zapf, J. (2012). Is two a plural marker in early child language? Developmental Psychology 48(1), 10–17.
Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L. (2011). Reassessing the applicability of Processability Theory: The case of nominal plural. Second Language Research, 27(4), 509–533.
Dalrymple, M., & Mofu, S. (2012). Plural semantics, reduplication, and numeral modification in Indonesian. Journal of Semantics, 29, 229–260.
Dao, L. H. T. (2007). Foreign language acquisition: Processes and constraints (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University.
Dardjowidjojo, S., & MacDonald, R. R. (1967). A student’s reference grammar of modern formal Indonesia. Georgetown University Press.
Di Biase, B. (1999). The acquisition of inflectional morphology in learners of Italian L2 with some reference to the role of phonological word structure. Paper presented at the EuroSLA, 9, June 10–12, Lund, Sweden.
(2002). Focusing strategies in second language development: A classroom-based study of Italian L2 in primary school. In B. D. Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language, acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (pp. 95–120). Language Australia.
(2007). A processability approach to the acquisition of Italian as a second language: Theory and applications. (Ph.D. thesis). Australian National University, Canberra. Retrieved from [URL].
(2008). Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 197–219). Cambridge Scholars.
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18(3), 274–302.
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2015). The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. D. Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monographs Series 3) (pp. 85–115). Eurosla.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell.
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Definite articles. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Retrieved on 10 July 2022 from [URL]
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23(2), 245–258.
Ettlinger, M., & Zapf, J. (2011). The role of phonology in children’s acquisition of the plural. Language Acquisition, 18(4), 294–313.
Hakuta, K. (1974). A preliminary report on the development of grammatical morphemes in a Japanese girl learning English as a second language. Bilingual Education Project. OISE.
Haspelmath, M. (2013). Occurrence of nominal plurality. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Retrieved on 10 July 2022 from [URL]
Hawkins, J. A. (2009). Germanic Languages. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages (pp. 51–58). Routledge.
Itani-Adams, Y. (2007). Lexical and grammatical development in Japanese-English bilingual first language acquisition. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 165–190). Cambridge Scholars.
Jia, G. (2003). The acquisition of the English plural morpheme by native Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(6), 1297–1311.
Krashen, S. D. (1976). Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 10(2), 157–168.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. Routledge.
Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara Seri Sosial Humaniora, 12(1), 9–20.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, C. Kramsch, & R. Ginsberg (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.
Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. L. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179–192). John Benjamins.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587.
Mohamed Salleh, R. T. A. (2017). Bilingual first language acquisition in Malay and English: A morphological and suprasegmental study in the development of plural expressions in a bilingual child (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western Sydney University.
Mohamed Salleh, R. T. A., Kawaguchi, S., Jones, C., & Di Biase, B. (2016). The development of plural expressions in a Malay-English bilingual child. An International Journal of Asian Literatures, Cultures and Englishes, 10(2), 111–131.
Nababan, P. W. J. (1991). Language in education: The case of Indonesia. International Review of Education, 37(1), 115–131.
Pallotti, G. (2007). An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics 28, 361–382.
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186–214.
(1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52–79.
(1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–251). John Benjamins.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.
(2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). John Benjamins.
Roos, J. (2016). Acquisition as a gradual process: Second language development in the EFL classroom. In J-U. Kessler, A. Lenzing, & M. Liebner (Eds), Developing, modelling and assessing second languages: Processability approaches to language acquisition research and teaching (pp. 121–134). John Benjamins.
Sloetjes, H., & Wittenburg, P. (2008). ELAN (Version 5.0). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved on 10 July 2022 from [URL]
Sneddon, J. N., Adeelar, A., Djenar, D. N., & Ewing, M. C. (2012). Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.
Tadmor, U. (2009). Malay-Indonesian. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages (pp. 791–818). Routledge.
Tsukamoto, S. (2014). Key Word in Context (KWIC) Concordance software (Version 5). Nihon University College of Humanities and Sciences. Retrieved on 10 July 2022 from [URL]
Uzir, S. F. A. B. S., & Mohamed Salleh, R. T. A. (2020). The development of English plural expressions among Malaysian kindergarten children. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language and Literature 2020 Kuala Lumpur, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), 15–17 January 2020.
Yamaguchi, Y. (2010). The acquisition of English as a second language by a Japanese primary school child: a longitudinal study from a processability viewpoint (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Sydney. [URL]
