Cover not available

In:Widening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
Edited by Anke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas and Jana Roos
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 7] 2019
► pp. 207–230

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
Discourse-pragmatic conditions for Object topicalisation structures in early L2 Chinese

Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.7.09zha
In this chapter, I explore the connection between language processing and discourse-pragmatic factors in the L2 acquisition of three (Mandarin) Chinese Object topicalisation structures. Processability Theory (Pienemann, 1998, 2005) and Information Structure Theory (Lambrecht, 1994) are employed to investigate when the required processing procedures are in place in the learners’ L2 Chinese, what facilitates the learners’ discourse-pragmatic interpretation of the communicative context such that among various structural possibilities, they choose the non-canonical Object topicalisation structures. Two longitudinal studies of 6 ab-initio L2 learners of Chinese in two learning environments were examined. The findings show three types of discourse contexts to be particularly conducive for the production of the Object topicalisation structures: (1) Question and Answer (Q&A) sequences; (2) the presence of a local inanimate topic (an inanimate NP being the sentence topic at a particular point of a conversation); and (3) the ‘disposal’ situation. The study enhances our understanding of the discourse-pragmatic conditions that motivate and trigger L2 structural choices under the general constraints of processability.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chinese Object topicalisation structures
  • 3.The studies: Informants, data collection and data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1The processing factor in Object topicalisation
    • 4.2Discourse-pragmatic conditions for Object topicalisation
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, R. (1995). Communicative dynamism and word order in Mandarin Chinese. Language Science 17(2), 201–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in Child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24, 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2), 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–574.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. (1995). Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In P. Dowing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in Chinese (pp. 297–329). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Chinese as a Topic-Comment (not Topic-Prominent and not SVO) language. In J. Xing (Ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches (pp. 9–22). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1975). The semantic function of word order in Chinese. In C. Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 163–195). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–490). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, B. (2016). A processing approach to the L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University.
Pienemann, M., di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, X. (2006). Acquisition sequence of three constructions: An analysis of the Interlanguage of learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 41(3), 89–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, L., & Langendoen, T. (1985). Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, B. (1995). Acquisition of based-generated topics by English-speaking learners of Chinese. Language Learning 45(4), 567–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2001). Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: A processability perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University.
(2007). Testing the Topic Hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. In F. Mansouri (Ed.). Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 145–172). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015) The Emergence of sentence Topic in a Topic-prominent language: A descriptive study of L2 Chinese. In K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman & M. Van Herreweghe (Eds.), Theoretical and methodological developments in Processability Theory (pp. 45–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, X., & Lantolf, J. P. (2015). Natural or artificial: Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning 65(1), 152–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, D. (1998). Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Liu, Bo, Bruno Di Biase & Satomi Kawaguchi
2023. The development of lexical mapping in Chinese L2. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Keßler, Jörg‐U. & Anke Lenzing
2022. Grammar in Foreign and Second Language Classes. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue