Cover not available

In:Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 119136

References (24)
References
Artoni, D. & Magnani, M. 2015. Acquiring case marking in Russian as a second language: An exploratory study on subject and object. In Grammatical Development in Second Languages: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory [Eurosla Monograph Series 3], C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (eds), 177–193. Paris: Eurosla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. 2003. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36: 189–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baten, K. 2011. Processability Theory and German case acquisition. Language Learning 61(2): 455–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. The Acquisition of the German Case System by Foreign Language Learners. [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, H. & Russell, A. 2004. Annotating multimedia/multi-modal resources with ELAN. In Proceedings of LREC 2004, Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, M. Lino, M. Xavier, F. Ferreira, R. Costa & R. Silva (eds), 2065–2068. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S. 2002. Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research 18(3): 274–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Biase, B., Bettoni, C. & Medojević, L. 2015. The development of case: a study of Serbian in contact with Australian English. In Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory, C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (eds), 195–212. Amsterdam: The European Second Language Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, M. 2013a. Determining dominant word order. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]>
2013b. Order of subject, object and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]>
Ellis, R. 2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(2): 141–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erlam, R. 2006. Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics 27(3): 464–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C. 1997. The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Zhang, X. 2015. Response to Pienemann’s critique of Zhang and Lantolf (2015). Language Learning 65(3): 752–760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3e edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1984. Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2): 186–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Keßler, J. & Lenzing, A. 2013. Developmentally moderated transfer and the role of the L2 in L3 acquisition. In Language Acquisition and Use in Multilingual Contexts: Theory and Practice, A. Flyman Mattsson & C. Norrby (eds), 142–159. Lund: Travaux de l’Institute Linguistique de Lund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 2015. An Outline of Processability Theory and Its Relationship to Other Approaches to SLA: An Outline of Processability Theory. Language Learning 65(1). 123–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saturno, J. 2015. Perceptual prominence and morphological processing in initial second language acquisition. In pS-prominenceS: Prominences in linguistics. Proceedings of the international Conference, A. De Dominicis (ed.), 76–95. Viterbo: Disucom Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. 1993. Syntactic weight vs information structure and word order variation in Polish. Journal of Linguistics 29(2): 233–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spada, N., Shiu, J., & Tomita, Y. 2015. Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning 65(3): 723–751. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinther, T. 2002. Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12(1): 54–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, X. & Lantolf, J. 2015. Natural or artificial: Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning 65(1): 152–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Saturno, Jacopo
2020. Word formation in the earliest stages of L2 Polish. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:2  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Saturno, Jacopo
2022. Production of inflectional morphology in intercomprehension-based language teaching: the case of Slavic languages. International Journal of Multilingualism 19:3  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Saturno, Jacopo & Marzena Watorek
2020. The emergence of functional case marking in initial varieties of Polish L2. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:1  pp. 32 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue