In:Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages:
Edited by Jörg-U. Keßler, Anke Lenzing and Mathias Liebner
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 5] 2016
► pp. 65–78
Get fulltext
Processability Theory and language development in children with Specific Language Impairment
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 29 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.5.03hak
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.5.03hak
Children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) represent a special group among young monolingual children, since they have problems acquiring their first language. Most research deals with English-speaking children, and points to bound morphology as the problematic area. However, cross-linguistic studies show that SLI characteristics differ between languages, and that it is not always bound morphology that is affected but sometimes other phenomena, for example syntax or function words. The seemingly contradictory findings can be accommodated within Processability Theory (PT) and from the point of view of feature unification at different levels of processability. Focussing on individual performances instead of group means changes the perspective and makes it possible to analyze children with SLI as learners along a developmental continuum.
References (27)
Bedore, L.M., & Leonard, L.B. (2005). Verb inflections and noun phrase morphology in the spontaneous speech of Spanish-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 195-225.
Bishop, D. (2009). Specific Language Impairment as a language learning disability. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 2, 163-165.
Clahsen, H. (1992). Linguistic perspectives on Specific Language Impairment. Theorie des Lexicons. Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs 282. Düsseldorf: Seminar für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
DiBiase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18, 272-300.
Fletcher, P., Leonard, L., Stokes, S.F., & Wonga, A. (2009). Morphosyntactic deficits in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. In S.-P. Law, B.S. Weekes, & A.W-Y. Wong (Eds.), Language disorders in speakers of Chinese (pp. 75-88). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Fukuda, S., & Fukuda, S. (2001). The acquisition of complex predicates in Japanese specifically language-impaired and normally developing children. Brain & Language, 77, 305–320.
Gopnik, M. (1994). Impairments of tense in a familial language disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 109-133.
Håkansson, G. (1997). Language impairment from a processing perspective. Working Papers, 46, 131-151. Lund: Dept of Linguistics, Lund University.
. (2001). Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 85-99.
Håkansson, G., & Hansson, K. (2000). Comprehension and production of relative clauses: A comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language, 27, 313-333
Hansson, K., & Nettelbladt, U. (1995). Grammatical characteristics of Swedish children with SLI. Journal of Speech, and Hearing Research, 38, 589-598.
Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Leonard, L. (2000). Specific Language Impairment in Swedish: The status of verb morphology and word order. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 848-864.
Hsieh, L., Leonard, L., & Swanson, L. (1999). Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input; the contribution of frequency, sentence position and duration. Journal of Child Language, 26, 531 – 543.
Ito, T., Fukuda, S., & Fukuda, S. (2009). Differences between grammatical and lexical development in Japanese specific language impairment: A case study. Poznán Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45, 221-221.
Jakubowitz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C, & Gerard, C. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113-160.
Josefsson, G. (2004). Input and output. Sentence patterns in child and adult Swedish. In G. Josefsson, C. Platzack, & G. Håkansson (Eds.), The acquisition of Swedish grammar (pp. 95- 133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leonard, L. (1989). Language learnability and specific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 179-203.
. (2009). Some reflections on the study of children with specific language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25(2), 169-171.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (Ed.). (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G. (1999). A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 383- 420.
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (1996). Towards tense as a clinical marker of Specific Language Impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239 -1257.
Tanaka Welty, Y., Watanabe, J., & Menn, L. (2002). Language production in SLI Japanese preschoolers. In E. Fava (Ed.), Clinical linguistics. Theory and applications in speech pathology and therapy (pp. 175-195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Dyson, Bronwen, Gisela Håkansson & Kirrie J. Ballard
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
